Skip to main content

Inaction on Asbestos Disasters and Delayed Countermeasures*

  • Chapter
Asbestos Disaster

Abstract

What might have changed had there been no Kubota Shock? Local residents viewed asbestos problems as workplace accidents, and rarely considered them to have a pollution-related dimension. However, it appears that the issue abruptly took on that dimension in 1987 with mounting public concern over the removal of spray-on asbestos materials from school facilities, and reports of asbestos dumping at the Yokosuka naval base. However, even in these cases, the issue was treated as a construction-related problem with sprayed asbestos applications, and was deemed unlikely to have occurred at all if workers had followed proper control procedures.

The national government is clearly guilty of inaction on the asbestos issue. It is projected that the scale of asbestos harm and contamination will continue to grow in the years ahead. The Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief has been established and is now in force. As noted in the review of selected provisions, the New Law has quite a few problems. This is a law that should be revised, with a preamble that clarifies the national government’s liability, and recognizes the asbestos crisis to be the stock pollution disaster that it is.

*Translated and revised from the Japanese original, Obata, N (2008). Inaction on Asbestos Disasters and Delayed Countermeasures. Policy Science (in Japanese), Supplementary Volume, 13–27, with permission of the Policy Science Association of Ritsumeikan University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Notes

    1.Cabinet Ministerial Conference on the Asbestos Crisis (2005). “Review of Past Government’s Handling of Asbestos Issues (Supplement).”

  2. 2.

    .Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee on the Environment, House of Councillors, 164th Diet Session, No. 2, p. 4, 2006.

  3. 3.

    .Compiled from available documentation.

  4. 4.

    .Nihon Keizai Shimbun Newspaper, May 26, 2006.

  5. 5.

    .Socialist Party of Japan (1992). “Asbestos-Containing Product Control Act”.

  6. 6.

    .Cabinet Ministerial Conference on the Asbestos Crisis (2005). “Interim Measures against the Asbestos Crisis.”

  7. 7.

    .Ministry of the Environment (2005). “A Review of Past Handling of Asbestos Issues by the Ministry of the Environment”.

  8. 8.

    .United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED) (1992). Rio Declaration on the Environment and Development.

  9. 9.

    .Joel et al. (1998). The Precautionary Principle in Action: A Handbook. The Science and Environmental Health Network. http://www.sehn.org/. Accessed May 5, 2010.

  10. 10.

    .Yomiuri Shimbun Newspaper, July 22, 2005.

  11. 11.

    .Kubota Corp. http://www.kubota.co.jp/. Accessed May 5, 2010. NICHIAS Corporation. http://www.nichias.co.jp/. Accessed May 5, 2010.

  12. 12.

    .Meeting on Employer’s Burden Relating to Asbestos Health Damage Relief, the Ministry of the Environment (2006). “Basic Standpoint on Employee’s Burden Relating to Asbestos Health Damage Relief”.

References

  • BANJAN, Asbestos Center (eds) (2004) Toward non-asbestos society: the challenge posed by killer dust surrounding us (in Japanese). Kamogawa Press, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara I (2005) The role of local governments, administration accused for omission on asbestos issue. Glob Environ (in Japanese) 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto Y (2006) Pluralistic structure of Liability Law (in Japanese). Yuhikaku, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirose H (2005) The issue of government’s inaction on asbestos. Wkly Econ (in Japanese) 3779

    Google Scholar 

  • Joel T et al (1998) The precautionary principle in action, a handbook. The Science and Environmental Health Network. Accessed 5 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Kita M (2006) Contradictions in policy of having all businesses contribute to the asbestos victim relief fund (in Japanese). October 11, 2006. http://www.news.janjan.jp/living/0610/0610092515/1.php. Accessed 5 May 2010

  • Morinaga K (ed) (2005) Occupational asbestos exposure and asbestos-related diseases: fundamental knowledge and workers accident compensation (in Japanese). Sanshin Tosho, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Natori Y (2006) Current situation and issue of victims (in Japanese). Asbestos Center. http://www.asbestoscenter.jp/about/propositions/victims20060115.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2010

  • NICHIAS Corporation (1996) One hundred year’s history of NICHIAS (in Japanese). NICHIAS, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norio Obata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Obata, N. (2011). Inaction on Asbestos Disasters and Delayed Countermeasures*. In: Miyamoto, K., Morinaga, K., Mori, H. (eds) Asbestos Disaster. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53915-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics