Advertisement

Inaction on Asbestos Disasters and Delayed Countermeasures*

  • Norio Obata

Abstract

What might have changed had there been no Kubota Shock? Local residents viewed asbestos problems as workplace accidents, and rarely considered them to have a pollution-related dimension. However, it appears that the issue abruptly took on that dimension in 1987 with mounting public concern over the removal of spray-on asbestos materials from school facilities, and reports of asbestos dumping at the Yokosuka naval base. However, even in these cases, the issue was treated as a construction-related problem with sprayed asbestos applications, and was deemed unlikely to have occurred at all if workers had followed proper control procedures.

The national government is clearly guilty of inaction on the asbestos issue. It is projected that the scale of asbestos harm and contamination will continue to grow in the years ahead. The Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief has been established and is now in force. As noted in the review of selected provisions, the New Law has quite a few problems. This is a law that should be revised, with a preamble that clarifies the national government’s liability, and recognizes the asbestos crisis to be the stock pollution disaster that it is.

Keywords

Precautionary Approach Work Clothing Workplace Accident Asbestos Dust Asbestos Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. BANJAN, Asbestos Center (eds) (2004) Toward non-asbestos society: the challenge posed by killer dust surrounding us (in Japanese). Kamogawa Press, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  2. Hagiwara I (2005) The role of local governments, administration accused for omission on asbestos issue. Glob Environ (in Japanese) 36Google Scholar
  3. Hashimoto Y (2006) Pluralistic structure of Liability Law (in Japanese). Yuhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirose H (2005) The issue of government’s inaction on asbestos. Wkly Econ (in Japanese) 3779Google Scholar
  5. Joel T et al (1998) The precautionary principle in action, a handbook. The Science and Environmental Health Network. Accessed 5 May 2010Google Scholar
  6. Kita M (2006) Contradictions in policy of having all businesses contribute to the asbestos victim relief fund (in Japanese). October 11, 2006. http://www.news.janjan.jp/living/0610/0610092515/1.php. Accessed 5 May 2010
  7. Morinaga K (ed) (2005) Occupational asbestos exposure and asbestos-related diseases: fundamental knowledge and workers accident compensation (in Japanese). Sanshin Tosho, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  8. Natori Y (2006) Current situation and issue of victims (in Japanese). Asbestos Center. http://www.asbestoscenter.jp/about/propositions/victims20060115.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2010
  9. NICHIAS Corporation (1996) One hundred year’s history of NICHIAS (in Japanese). NICHIAS, TokyoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Policy ScienceRitsumeikan UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations