Asbestos Litigation in Japan: Recent Trends and Related Issues


In Japan, the initial momentum for asbestos litigation proved slow, but starting in the 1970s, cases began to appear on a sporadic basis, mainly involving damage compensation claims by victims of diseases stemming from occupational exposure to asbestos, holding their employers liable for a failure to fulfill their obligation to implement safeguards, or for acts of tort. Since the Kubota Shock in 2005, several significant asbestos litigations have been filed. These included the Sennan lawsuit against the national government, representing former asbestos factory workers and surviving kin of deceased workers who had been employed by asbestos factories, damage compensation claims against asbestos product manufacturers and distributors to offset the cost of removing asbestos materials from buildings, and claims for compensation for airborne asbestos from asbestos product factories that could create health problems for residents in surrounding neighborhoods, such as the former Kubota Kanzaki factory. To cultivate the basic perspectives that facilitate progress toward a lasting solution to the asbestos problems, it is critically important to clarify in detail the fundamental legal liabilities of private companies and the national government for the harm suffered by the individual victims of asbestos-linked diseases.


National Government Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Malignant Mesothelioma Court Decision Product Liability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Furukawa T (2009) Awareness of health problems caused by asbestos. In: Asbestos Center (ed) Why did the asbestos whirlwind spread? A history of Japan’s asbestos industry and the involvement of government (in Japanese). Nihon-Hyoron-sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. Ikeda N (2006) Asbestos litigation in Japan: current status and future challenges (in Japanese). NBL 827:40–47Google Scholar
  3. Ishihara K (2006) Future subjects of countermeasures against asbestos in construction industry. Policy Sci (in Japanese), supplementary volume: 1–11Google Scholar
  4. Ishihara K (2009) Asbestos damage and remedial measures in the construction industry. Res Environ Disruption (in Japanese) 38(4):55–60Google Scholar
  5. Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association (ed) (2006) Why is asbestos dangerous? (in Japanese). Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  6. Kamei T et al (eds) (2007) Asbestos and mesothelioma (in Japanese). Shinoharashinsha Inc, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  7. Kato M (2009) Asbestos Shock by Kubota Corp. Disaster in Amagasaki: lessons from Asia’s worst asbestos damage. Res Environ Disruption (in Japanese) 38(4):40–45Google Scholar
  8. Kobayashi H (1993) The product liability law: enactment and countermeasures (in Japanese). Chuo Keizai-Sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  9. Koga T (1995) A study of product liability (in Japanese). Koyo Shobo, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  10. Kohyama N (2006) What is asbestos? In: Morinaga K (ed) In asbestos pollution and its health effect (in Japanese), 2nd edn. Nihon-Hyoron-sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsumoto K (1986/1987) A theoretical study of the debate over the obligation to ensure worker safety, with a focus on the relationship with the debate over liability for workplace accidents (1) to (3). Ann Waseda Univ Grad Sch Law (in Japanese) 38:95–115; 40:275–298; 43:243–267Google Scholar
  12. Matsumoto K (2002) Prescription and justice: the newly evolving perspectives on the extinctive prescription and exclusion periods (in Japanese). Nihon-Hyouron-sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  13. Matsumoto K (2003) The starting point of the prescription stipulated in the first sentence of Article 724 of the Civil Code: from a realized starting point to a normative starting point. Ritsumeikan Hogaku (in Japanese) 286:243–287Google Scholar
  14. Matsumoto K (2006a) The beginning of the end for the exclusion period concept in Civil Code Article 724, 2nd sentence: a reassessment of the supreme court 1989 ruling unifying legal precedents in accordance with the exclusion period concept. Ritsumeikan Hogaku (in Japanese) 304:316–339Google Scholar
  15. Matsumoto K (2006b) The ‘time of the tortious act’ in the second sentence of Article 724 of the Civil Code and the prospect of exercising one’s rights: the trajectory of the supreme court’s 2004 ruling the Chikuho Pneumoconiosis Lawsuit. Ritsumeikan Hogaku (in Japanese) 307:148–205Google Scholar
  16. Matsumoto K (2007) Torts with delayed outcomes and the starting point of the 20-year prescription stipulated in Civil Code Article 724, 2nd sentence: advocacy of a normative concept of damage and a comparison with the prescription for public prosecution. Ritsumeikan Hogaku (in Japanese) 310:424–454Google Scholar
  17. Matsumoto K (2009) Asbestos victims and Joint Tortious Act. Rodo Hanrei (in Japanese) 975:2Google Scholar
  18. Matsumoto K (2010) Sprayed buildings with asbestos and liability for structure and land of lesson of building: about the judgment of Osaka District Court 31.8.2009 on the case of Kintetsu. Ritsumeikan Hogaku (in Japanese) 327–328:880–927Google Scholar
  19. Minami S (2008) The development of the asbestos industry and the incidence of occupational disasters: a focus on Osaka Prefecture’s asbestos industry. Policy Sci (in Japanese), supplementary volume: 145–165Google Scholar
  20. Miyamoto K (2006) Employee death due to asbestos inhalation and corporate liability for failure to take steps to protect worker safety. Shiho Hanrei Remarks (in Japanese) 32:24–27Google Scholar
  21. Miyamoto K (2009) Relief for asbestos damage: responsibility and remedial measures for multiple stock disaster. Res Environ Disruption (in Japanese) 38(4):2–7Google Scholar
  22. Mori H (2009) Problems and responsibility for asbestos disaster in Japan: the Sennan case. Res Environ Disruption (in Japanese) 38(4):34–39Google Scholar
  23. Morinaga K (2006) Why an asbestos problem now? In: Morinaga K (ed) Asbestos pollution and its health effect (in Japanese), 2nd edn. Nihon-Hyoron-sha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  24. Morinaga K (ed) (2008) Asbestos exposure and asbestos-related diseases: fundamental knowledge and compensation/relief expanded edition (in Japanese). Sanshin Tosho, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  25. Murayama T (2008) Current and future relief for asbestos victims. Res Environ Disruption (in Japanese) 37(3):8–13Google Scholar
  26. Obata N (2006) Inaction and the slow response to asbestos victims. Policy Sci (in Japanese), supplementary volume: 13–27Google Scholar
  27. Osaka E (2010) “Take home” asbestos exposure cases and tort liability: comprehensive study of United States and Japan. Toyohogaku (in Japanese) 54(1):161–185Google Scholar
  28. Ozawa H (2006) Asbestos in buildings and the law (in Japanese). Hakuyosha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  29. Study Group on the Asbestos Problem (ed) (2007) Asbestos countermeasures handbook (in Japanese). Gyosei, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsuji H (2007/2009) A study on asbestos litigation: focusing on epidemiologic causality (1) to (3). Okayama Law J (in Japanese) 57(2):65–78; 58(2):23–59; 59 (1):133–156Google Scholar
  31. Uga K (2008) Right of intervention by public administration and liability of risk management. In: Isobe T et al (eds) New concepts of administrative law, vol III (in Japanese). Yuhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamashita T (1988) The legal handling of asbestos-induced health problems: the court ruling in the Nagano asbestosis lawsuit as a turning point. Hanrei Times (in Japanese) 660:4–20Google Scholar
  33. Yasuda Research Institute (ed) (1989) Product liability: a challenge for multinationals (in Japanese). Yuhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  34. Yoshida K (2006) Property, housing welfare, and reparation problems in the multi-cultural age (in Japanese). Yuhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  35. Yoshimura R (2002) Environment private law: its development and contemporary problems (in Japanese). Houritsu Bunkasha, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  36. Yoshimura R (2010) Damage by asbestos and their liability of the state: problems of Sennan asbestos case (in Japanese). 82(2): 52–56Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawRitsumeikan UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations