Abstract
Modern environmental issues imply that decision-makers consider simultaneously various dimensions, such as science and economics. To take into account opinions from experts of different fields, they can rely on boundary organizations, institutions able to cross the gap between different domains and act beyond the boundaries. By encouraging a flow of useful information, they provide a better understanding of a situation characterized by uncertainty, increasing the efficiency of the decision-making process. Though never formally proved, this hypothesis is widely accepted based on the observation of existing institutions. In this paper, we observe the impact of boundary organizations through an agent-based model of continuous opinion dynamics over two dimensions where heterogeneous experts distinguished by credibility and uncertainty interact. We conclude that boundary organizations significantly reduce the diversity of opinions expressed and increase the number of experts agreeing to emerging positions, which confirms their positive impact on the efficiency of decision-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Guston D, Clark W, Keating T, Cash D, Moser S, Miller C, Powers C (2000) Report of the workshop on boundary organizations in environmental policy and science, 9–10 December 1999. Global Environmental Assessment Project, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
Davenport S, Leitch S (2005) The role of boundary organisations in maintaining separation in the triple helix. In: Triple Helix 5 Conference, Turin
Jasanoff S (1990) The fifth branch: science advisers as policy makers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Guston D (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Human Values 26(4):399–408. SAGE Publications
Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Guston D, Jäger J, Mitchell R (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Science and technology for sustainable development special feature ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8086–8091
Clark W, Mitchell R, Cash D, Alcock F (2002) Information as influence: how institutions mediate the impact of scientific assessments on global environmental affairs. Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP02-044, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
Miller C (2000) Boundary organizations: strategies for linking knowledge to action. Draft based on the Dec. 9 workshop on boundary organizations in environmental policy and science, Global Environmental Assessment Project, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
Guston D (2000) Between politics and science: assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge University Press, New York
Socci A (2001) Boundary organizations and ethics in science. In: Global Climate Change and Society proceedings, Boulder
Scott A (2000) Scoping report for the European Environment Agency, Experts’ corner report. SPRU (Science and Tecnhology Policy Research), Environmental issues series no. 15
Axelrod R, Tesfatsion L (2006) A guide for newcomers to agent-based modeling in the social sciences. In: Tesfatsion L, Judd K (eds) Handbook of computational economics, vol. 2: agent-based computational economics. Amsterdam
Deffuant G, Neau D, Amblard F, Weisbuch G (2001) Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv Complex Syst 3(1):87–98. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Boissin, D. (2011). Boundary Organizations: An Evaluation of Their Impact Through a Multi-Agent System. In: Chen, SH., Terano, T., Yamamoto, R. (eds) Agent-Based Approaches in Economic and Social Complex Systems VI. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 8. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53907-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53907-0_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-53906-3
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-53907-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)