Detecting Groundwater Inputs into Bangkok Canals Via Radon and Thoron Measurements

  • Supitcha Chanyotha
  • Makoto Taniguchi
  • William C. Burnett


Naturally-occurring radon (222Rn) is very concentrated in groundwater relative to surface waters and thus serves as an effective groundwater discharge tracer. Conductivity is also typically present in groundwaters at different levels than associated surface waters and thus may also be used as a tracer of ­interactions between these water masses. Previous studies by our group using radon and conductivity as groundwater tracers suggested that there is shallow groundwater seeping into the man-made canals (“klongs”) around Bangkok. Furthermore, the groundwater was shown to be an important pathway of nutrient contamination to the surface waters. In the present study, we have re-examined some of the same canals and added thoron (220Rn) measurements in order to evaluate if this would provide more site-specific information.

Thoron is a member of the natural 232Th decay chain, has exactly the same chemical properties as radon, but has a much shorter half-life (56 s) than radon (3.84 days). Because of its rapid decay, if one detects thoron in the environment, there must be a source nearby. Thus, thoron is potentially an excellent prospecting tool. In the case of measurements in natural waters, sources of thoron (as radon) could indicate groundwater seeps. During our surveys in the canals of Bangkok, we did successfully measure thoron and its distribution was more variable than that of radon, suggesting that seepage into the canals is not uniform. Areas of higher ground elevation, often in areas where Thai temples are located, were particularly high in thoron.


Radon Activity Groundwater Seepage Radium Isotope High Radon Radon Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The research presented here is a contribution to the “Human Impacts on Urban Subsurface Environments” Project of the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN) in Kyoto, Japan. This investigation was conducted while W. Burnett was a visiting scientist at RIHN during the summer of 2009. The authors acknowledge RIHN for the financial, intellectual, and personal support that made this investigation possible. We also thank the following students from the Department of Nuclear Technology, Chulalongkorn University, for their excellent assistance during the field work: Ms. Rawiwan Kritsananuwat, Mr. Phongyut Sriploy, Ms. Karnwalee Pangza, and Mr. Jumpot Jamnian.


  1. Burnett WC, Kim G, Lane-Smith D (2001) A continuous radon monitor for assessment of radon in coastal ocean waters. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 249:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burnett WC, Bokuniewicz H, Huettel M, Moore WS, Taniguchi M (2003) Groundwater and ­porewater inputs to the coastal zone. Biogeochemistry 66:3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnett WC, Aggarwal PK, Bokuniewicz H, Cable JE, Charette MA, Kontar E, Krupa S, Kulkarni KM, Loveless A, Moore WS, Oberdorfer JA, Oliveira J, Ozyurt N, Povinec P, Privitera AMG, Rajar R, Ramessur RT, Scholten J, Stieglitz T, Taniguchi M, Turner JV (2006) Quantifying submarine groundwater discharge in the coastal zone via multiple methods. Sci Total Environ 367:498–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnett WC, Wattayakorn G, Taniguchi M, Dulaiova H, Sojisuporn P, Rungsupa S, Ishitobi T (2007a) Groundwater-derived nutrient inputs to the Upper Gulf of Thailand. Continental Shelf Res 27:176–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnett WC, Dimova N, Dulaiova H, Lane-Smith D, Parsa B, Szabo Z (2007b) Measuring thoron (220Rn) in natural waters. In: Warwick P (ed) Environmental radiochemical analysis III. Royal Society of Chemistry, RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 24–37Google Scholar
  6. Burnett WC, Chanyotha S, Wattayakorn G, Taniguchi M, Umezawa Y, Ishitobi T (2009) Groundwater as a pathway of nutrient contamination in Bangkok, Thailand. Sci Total Environ 407:3198–3207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimova N, Burnett WC, Lane-Smith D (2009) Improved automated analysis of radon (222Rn) and thoron (220Rn) in natural waters. Environ Sci Technol 43:8599–8603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dulaiova H, Peterson R, Burnett WC (2005) A multi-detector continuous monitor for assessment of 222Rn in the coastal ocean. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 263(2):361–365Google Scholar
  9. Dulaiova H, Burnett WC, Wattayakorn G, Sojisuporn P (2006) Are groundwater inputs into ­river-dominated areas important? The Chao Phraya River – Gulf of Thailand. Limnol Oceanogr 51:2232–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moore WS (1996) Large groundwater inputs to coastal waters revealed by 226Ra enrichments. Nature 380:612–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moore WS (1999) The subterranean estuary: a reaction zone of ground water and sea water. Mar Chem 65:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sanford WE, Buapeng S (1996) Assessment of a groundwater flow model of the Bangkok Basin, Thailand, using carbon-14 based ages and paleohydrology. Hydrogeol J 4:26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Slomp CP, Van Cappellen P (2004) Nutrient inputs to the coastal ocean through submarine groundwater discharge: controls and potential impact. J Hydrol 295:64–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Taniguchi M, Burnett WC, Cable JE, Turner JV (2002) Investigations of submarine groundwater discharge. Hydrol Processes 16:2115–2129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Supitcha Chanyotha
    • 1
  • Makoto Taniguchi
    • 2
  • William C. Burnett
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear Technology, Faculty of EngineeringChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Research Institute for Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric SciencesFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations