Issues of Korean Alcohol Policy Perspectives


It is necessary to establish a comprehensive alcohol control policy in Korea because statistics on alcohol-related cases show a rise in deaths and injuries, and social economic loss resulting from alcohol-related causes. Korean Alcohol Policy (KAP) focuses on the protection of the traditional and domestic liquor industry as primary tax revenue while it aims to act as an administrative body to minimize damage from alcohol abuse. KAP utilizes the liquor license system, taxation, drink-driving countermeasures, control on legal drinking age, regulating alcohol advertisement, and a passive education program to control private and public alcohol consumption, distribution, and manufacturing. The following recommended changes are proposed: stricter and effective control of the liquor wholesale and retail system; reform of the present tax system to adopt an earmark tax; prompt conservative advertisement guidelines; implementation of a compulsory education program on moderate drinking; and establishment of a national professional committee to regulate alcohol policy.


Alcoholic Beverage Rice Wine Alcohol Policy National Health Promotion Food Sanitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Chun S, Sohn A, Yoo J et al (2009) Strategies for the national alcohol control policy. Korean Institute on Alcohol ProblemsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park JH et al (2006) Estimating the Korean burden of mental disease sickness. J Prev Med 33(1):39–45Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim KG (2004) A study on alcohol policies to create cultural supports for moderation in drinking. Korean Management Center for Health PromotionGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chun S, Sohn A, Cho J et al (2007) Alcohol-attributable fractions of disease in Korea. Korean Institute on Alcohol ProblemsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ministry of Health & Welfare (2008) Epidemiological survey on mental health in 2006. Ministry of Health & WelfareGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jung WJ (2006) Estimates of the social and economic costs of alcohol drinking. Graduate School of Public Health YonSei UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Song H, Cheong Y, Choi E et al (2005) Development of indicator for alcohol policy. Ministry of Health & WelfareGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chun S, Sohn A, Song C et al (2003) Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college. J Korean Alcohol Sci 4(2):119–135Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wechsler H, Lee JE et al (2003) Drinking and driving among college students: the influence of alcohol-control policies. Am J Prev Med 25(3):212–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ministry of Health and Welfare (2006) The 3rd National Nutritional Health Survey (2005). The 3rd National Health and Nutrition Survey on Korean Health Behavior. Korean Institute for Health and Social AffairsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karlsson T, Österberg E (2002) Revised: Dalen W (2005) The Netherlands.
  12. 12.
    Agostinelli G, Grube J (2002) Alcohol counter advertising and the media. A review of recent research. Alcohol Res Health 26(1):15–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Room R (2004) Drinking and coming of age in a cross-cultural perspective. In: National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, Reducing underage drinking: a collective responsibility, background papers (CD-ROM). Committee on developing a strategy to reduce and prevent underage drinking, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xie X, Mann R, Smart R (2000) The direct and indirect relationships between alcohol prevention measures and alcoholic liver cirrhosis mortality. J Stud Alcohol 61:499–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grube W, Stewart K (2004) Preventing impaired driving using alcohol policy. Traffic Injury Prev 5(3):199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagenaar AC, LaFond C, Shomshak A et al (2000) Alcohol policies in the United States: highlights from the 50 states. University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    World Health Organization (2000) International guide for monitoring alcohol consumption and related harm. Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence Noncommunicable Disease and Mental Health ClusterGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DeBackey SF, Stinson FS, Grant BF et al (1995) Liver cirrhosis mortality in the United States, 1970–1990. Surveillance report No. 37. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Division of Biometry and Epidemiology, Alcohol Epidemic Data System, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) (1999) Traffic safety facts 1998: alcohol. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, Department of Transportation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chun S (2003) A comparative study on the alcohol laws and policies between USA and Korea. Korean J Med Law 11(1):21–34Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chun S, Sohn, A, Cheong E (2005) A study on alcohol control policies to lead to a reduction in alcohol drinking. Korean Institute on Alcohol ProblemsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim CJ (2005) Directions of the National Health Promotion Law revision to add health promotion expenses to alcohol pricing. Policy debate data from the Office of the Korean National Assembly Kim, Choon JinGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sung MJ (1997) Reorganizing directions and policy themes for modernizing the Korean liquor tax system. Korean Institute of Public FinanceGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ministry of Health & Welfare (2006) National Alcohol Policy: Blue Bird Plan 2010. Ministry of Health & WelfareGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sung MJ (1999) An international comparison of control policies relating to alcohol merchandise distribution. Korean Institute of Public FinanceGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jung HB (2000) A study of Korean alcohol retailing methodologies. Korean Commission for Youth ProtectionGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hyun J (2002) Critical review on the proposal of quasi-tax on alcoholic beverage: economic perspective. J Korean Alcohol Sci 3(1):147–152Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sung MJ, Jang GH (1999) Reorganizing directions of the liquor tax rate system for social expense reduction and implementing WTO liquor tax decision. Policy debate data for reorganizing directions of the liquor tax rate system. The Korean Institute of Public Finance in Seoul, August 1999, pp 21–23Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kwak TW (2003) Reorganizing directions for liquor policy problems in Korea. Seo-Gang Economic Treatise 32(1)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jung HB, Kim SC, Kim HC (2001) A study of practical methods for the alcohol retail system. Korean Commission for Youth ProtectionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korean Institute on Alcohol Problems, Sahmyook UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations