Advertisement

Object-Oriented Land Cover Classification Based on Two Satellite Images Obtained in One Dry Season in Cambodia

  • Naoyuki Furuya
  • Hideki Saito
  • Sam Preap
  • Bora Tith
  • Makara Meas

Abstract

Some regions of the Mekong River basin still have considerable forest resources, but the pressure for exploiting these resources is very high. Changes of forest cover may strongly affect the water circulation of this region. Therefore, it is important to monitor changes of land cover of this region. In this study, we tested an objectoriented classification method to create a land cover classification map in Cambodia. A commercial object-oriented image analysis software package (eCognition) was used in this analysis. In an object-oriented classification method, the success of classification depends largely on the result of image segmentation. In this study, we overcame the difficulty in image segmentation by combining temporal images acquired in the early and late dry season. The overall accuracy was 0.70, and the Khat statistics value was 0.60. Although the accuracy was moderate, the discrimination between evergreen and deciduous forest types was good. However the mixed or the degraded land cover types were still hard to distinguish from each other. Using images taken in different phenological stages made it possible to both segment the images accurately and classify objects appropriately in an object-oriented classification process.

Keywords

Land Cover Image Segmentation Land Cover Category Shrub Land Japan International Cooperation Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benz UC, Hofman P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 58:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chavez PS (1988) An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sens Environ 24:459–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37(1):35–46. Defi nens Imaging GmbH, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. Definiens Imaging (2004) eCognition version 4 object oriented image analysis user guide.Google Scholar
  5. FAO (2005) Global forest resources assessment 2005. FAO Forestry Paper 147. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Foody GM, Hill RA (1996) Classification of tropical forest classes from Landsat TM data. Int J Remote Sens 17(12):2353–2367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall FG, Strebel DE, Nickeson JE, Goez SJ (1991) Radiometric rectification: toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sens Environ 35:11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ministry of Public Works and Transportation, Kingdom of Cambodia and Japan International Cooperation Agency, Japan (2003) Meta-database-Cambodia Reconnaissance Survey Digital Data JICA, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  9. National Office of Forest Inventory and Planning (NOFIP) (1992) Forest cover and land use in Lao PDR. Final report on the nationwide reconnaissance survey. Report no. 5. NOFIP, Vientiane, LaosGoogle Scholar
  10. Oetter DR, Cohen WB, Berterretche M, Maiersperger TK, Kennedy RE (2001) Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal Thematic Mapper data. Remote Sens Environ 76:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schott JR, Salvaggio C, Volchok WJ (1988) Radiometric scene normalization using pseudoinvariant features. Remote Sens Environ 26:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schriever JR, Congalton RG (1995) Evaluating seasonal variability as an aid to cover-type mapping from Landsat Thematic Mapper data in the Northeast. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61:321–327Google Scholar
  13. Wolter PT, Mlandenoff DJ, Host GE, Crow TR (1995) Improved forest classification in the Northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61:1129–1143Google Scholar
  14. Yijun C, Hussin YA (2003) Object-oriented classifier for detection tropical deforestation using LANDSAT ETM+ in Berau, East Kalimant, Indonesia. Map Asia Conference 2003 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naoyuki Furuya
    • 1
  • Hideki Saito
    • 2
  • Sam Preap
    • 3
  • Bora Tith
    • 3
  • Makara Meas
    • 3
  1. 1.Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI)TsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Kyushu Research CenterForestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI)KumamotoJapan
  3. 3.Forestry AdministrationForest and Wildlife Science Research Institute (FWSRI)Phnom PenhCambodia

Personalised recommendations