Advertisement

Embedding heterogeneous levels of decisional autonomy in multi-robot systems

  • Jeremi Gancet
  • Simon Lacroix

Abstract

This paper presents an architecture for multi-robot (MR) systems in which robots exhibit heterogeneousness in terms of autonomous decisional capacities. This architecture enables various configurations of decision distribution among the components of the system, according both to the available decision making capabilities of the robots, and to the operational constraints related to the tasks to be performed. This architecture is instanciated in the context of a multi heterogeneous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) project, and in this context, details related to a generic executive (supporting the versatility of the architecture) are provided.

Keywords

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Task Allocation Decisional Autonomy Elementary Task Synchronization Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alami R., Chatila R., Fleury S., Ghallab M., Ingrand F.(1998). An Architecture for autonomy. In: Int. Journal of Robotics Research. Vol.17, p.315–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alami R., Ingrand F., Qutub S.(1998).A Scheme for Coordinating Multi-Robot Planning Activities and Plans Execution. European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’98)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    COMETS project’s official web site: http://www.comets-uavs.orgGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gat E.(1991). Integrating planning and reacting in a heterogeneous asynchronous architecture for mobile robots. In SIGART Bulletin 2, 17–74Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lemaire T., Alami R., Lacroix S.(2004). A Distributed Tasks Allocation Scheme in Multi-UAV Context, to appear in Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’04)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nau D., Au T.C., Ilghami O., Kuter U., Murdock W., Wu D., Yaman F. (2003). SHOP2: An HTN planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20:379–404MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ollero A., Hommel G., Gancet J., Gutierrez L.G., Viegas D.X., Forssen P.E., Gonzalez M.A. (2004). COMETS: A multiple heterogeneous UAV system. To appear in SSRR 04, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parker L.(1998). ALLIANCE: An architecture for fault-tolerant multi-robot cooperation. In IEEE Transactions on R.& A. 14(2):220–240Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simmons R., Smith T., Dias M.B., Goldberg D., Hershberger D., Stentz A., Zlot R.M. (2002) A Layered Architecture for Coordination of Mobile Robots. In: Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata, Proc. of the 2002 NRL Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems, Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith R.G.(1980). The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on ComputersGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Volpe R., Nesnas I., Estlin T., Mutz D., Petras R., Das H.(2001). The claraty architecture for robotic autonomy. In: Proc. of the 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MontanaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremi Gancet
    • 1
  • Simon Lacroix
    • 1
  1. 1.LAAS-CNRSToulouse

Personalised recommendations