Advertisement

OPLL pp 219-223 | Cite as

Treatment of OPLL and OLF of the Cervical Spine: Long-Term Results

  • Yoshiharu Kawaguchi

Keywords

Cervical Spine Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Cervical Myelopathy Posterior Surgery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y (1997) Choice of surgical procedure for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. In: Yonenobu K, Sakou T, Ono K (eds) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Springer, Tokyo, pp 135–142Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kato Y, Iwasaki M, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Ochi T (1998) Long-term follow-up results of laminectomy for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg 89:217–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Satomi K, Ogawa J, Ishii Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Shortterm complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine J 1:26–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, Kawaguchi H, Akune T, Anamizu Y, Katagawa T, Nakamura K (2001) Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 26:479–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K (2002) Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 96:180–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Ohmori K, Nakamura H, Kimura T (2003) Minimum 10-year follow-up after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop 411:129–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M, Takaishi H, Hirabayashi H, Hirabayashi K (2004) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Nakamura H, Sugimori K, Tsuji H, Kimura T (2001) Progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament following en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1798–1802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawaguchi Y, Furushima K, Sugimori K, Inoue I, Kimura T (2003) Association between polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene with the radiologic characteristic and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 28:1424–1426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, Gejo R, Yasuda T (2000) Surgical outcome of cervical expansive laminoplasty in patients with diabetes mellitus. Spine 25:551–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2003) Complication of open door laminoplasty. In: Nakamura K, Toyama Y, Hoshino Y (eds) Cervical Laminoplasty. Springer, Tokyo, pp 139–151Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiba K, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Toyama Y (2003) Segmental motor paralysis after laminoplasy. In: Nakamura K, Toyama Y, Hoshino Y (eds) Cervical laminoplasty. Springer, Tokyo, pp 163–167Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Ishihara H, Gejo R, Yoshino O (1999) Axial symptoms after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord 12:392–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishiara H, Nobukiyo M, Seki S, Kimura T (2003) Preventive measures for axial symptoms following cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:497–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ratliff JK, Cooper PR (2003) Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg 98(Suppl):230–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamaura I, Ono K (2005) Surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Part A. Thinning and anterior floating. In: Clark CR (ed) The cervical spine, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1099–1106Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matsuoka T, Yamaura I, Kurosa Y, Nakai O, Shindo S, Shinomiya K (2001) Long-term results of the anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 26:241–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mastunaga S, Sakou T (2005) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments: prevalence, presentation, and natural history. In: Clark CR (ed) The cervical spine, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1091–1098Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goto S, Kita T (1995) Long-term follow-up evaluation of surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 20:2247–2256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tani T, Ushida T, Ishida K, Iai H, Noguchi T, Yamamoto H (2002) Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 27:2491–2498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshiharu Kawaguchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryToyama Medical and Pharmaceutical UniversityToyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations