Skip to main content

Double-door Laminoplasty by Splitting Spinous Processes

  • Chapter
OPLL
  • 836 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yonenobu K, Okada K, Fuji T, Fujiwara K, Yamashitea K, Ono K (1986) Causes of neurological deterioration following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine 11:818–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mikawa Y, Shikata J, Yamamuro T (1987) Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy. Spine 12:6–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Miyazaki K, Kirita Y (1986) Extensive simultaneous multisegmental laminectomy for myelopathy due to the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Spine 11:531–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morimoto T, Okuno S, Nakase H, Kawaguchi S, Sakaki T (1999) Cervical myelopathy due to dynamic compression by the laminectomy membrane: dynamic MR imaging study. J Spinal Dis 12:172–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawai S, Sunago K, Doi M, Saika M, Taguchi T (1988) Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori’s method): procedure and follow-up results. Spine 13:1245–1250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K (1982) Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligaments. Spine 6:354–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8: 693–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H, Kobayashi M, Machida H, Izuka T, Hoshino Y, Hatsuyama Y (1982) Enlargement of the spinal canal by the sagittal splitting of the spinous processes (in Japanese). Bessatsu Seikeigeka 2:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heller JG, Edwards CC II, Murakami H, Rodts GE (2001) Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine 26:1330–1336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yonenobu K, Fuji T, Ono K, Okada K, Yamamoto T, Harada N (1985) Choice of surgical treatment for multisegemental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 10: 710–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ratriff JK, Cooper PR (2003) Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg (Spine 3) 98:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamazaki A, Homma T, Uchiyama S, Katsumi Y, Okumura H (1999) Morphologic limitations of posterior decompression by midsagittal splitting method for myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Spine 24: 32–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohnishi I, Kawaguchi H, Akune T, Anamizu Y, Kitagawa T, Nakamura K (2001) Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 26:479–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Kawaguchi H, Higashikawa A, Murakami M, Nakamura K (2005) Intraoperative sonography in laminoplasty for cervical OPLL. In: Investigation committee report on the ossification of the spinal ligament of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare and Labour, pp 141–143

    Google Scholar 

  15. Takeshita K, Peterson ETK, Bylski-Austrow D, Nakamura K, Crawford AH (2004) The nuchal ligament restrains cervical spine flexion. Spine 29:E388–E393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Spine 28:2447–2451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Kawaguchi H, Nakajima S, Akune T, Nakamura K (2004) Postoperative expansion of intramedullary high-intensity areas on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 29:1478–1482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tani T, Ushida T, Ishida K, Iai H, Noguchi T, Yamamoto H (2002) Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 27:2491–2498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seichi, A., Takeshita, K., Kawaguchi, H., Nakamura, K. (2006). Double-door Laminoplasty by Splitting Spinous Processes. In: Yonenobu, K., Nakamura, K., Toyama, Y. (eds) OPLL. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-32563-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-32563-5_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-32561-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-32563-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics