Advertisement

Applications of Tol2 Transposon-Mediated Gene Transfer for Stable Integration and Conditional Expression of Electroporated Genes in Chicken Embryos

  • Yuki Sato
  • Yoshiko Takahashi

Because of the high accessibility to developing embryos, avian embryos (chicken and quail) have long been used as a good model animal to study embryogenesis in vertebrates, especially amniotes (reviewed in Wolpert, 2004). The techniques used for “classical” avian embryology included tissue transplantations, tissue ablations, and cell-labeling by vital dye. At the end of the last century, the in ovo electropora tion technique was developed by Nakamura and his colleagues, and this modern method opened a way to study the roles of developmental genes directly in living embryos (Funahashi et al., 1999) reviewed in (Nakamura et al., 2004; Yasuda et al., 2000; Yasugi and Nakamura, 2000). This powerful technique allows us to introduce genes (DNA, RNA, morpholino) into embryos in a tissue-specific way by targeting a restricted area of embryonic tissues. Thus, the electroporation technique using chickens has provided numerous novel insights into the understanding of early development in vertebrates, making the chicken a unique model animal.

One of few shortfalls of the original technique has been that expression of electroporated genes does not persist for a long period of time probably because the introduced plasmids, which are not integrated into the genome, degrade or become diluted as embryonic cells undergo massive proliferation. Although a spontaneous genomic integration of electroporated genes could occur, this incidence must be extremely low. Since in most cases the electroporation is performed at embryonic day 1˜2 (E1˜E2), the “short life” of introduced genes hampers the analysis of the effects by introduced genes at late stages, i.e., from E5 onward, when a variety of organogenesis proceeds. At these late stages, the electroporation is difficult to perform because the embryo is much less accessible.

Keywords

Chicken Embryo Stable Integration Conditional Expression Medaka Fish EGFP Signal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balciunas, D., Wangensteen, K. J., Wilber, A., Bell, J., Geurts, A., Sivasubbu, S., Wang, X., Hackett, P. B., Largaespada, D. A., McIvor, R. S., Ekker, S. C. (2006). Harnessing a high cargo-capacity transposon for genetic applications in vertebrates. PLoS Genet 2, e169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fukuda, K., Sakamoto, N., Narita, T., Saitoh, K., Kameda, T., Iba, H., Yasugi, S. (2000). Application of efficient and specific gene transfer systems and organ culture techniques for the elucidation of mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction in the developing gut. Dev Growth Differ 42, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Funahashi, J., Okafuji, T., Ohuchi, H., Noji, S., Tanaka, H., Nakamura, H. (1999). Role of Pax-5 in the regulation of a mid-hindbrain organizer's activity. Dev Growth Differ 41, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kawakami, K. (2004). Transgenesis and gene trap methods in zebrafish by using the Tol2 trans-posable element. Methods Cell Biol 77, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kawakami, K. (2005). Transposon tools and methods in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 234, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kawakami, K. (2007). Tol2: a versatile gene transfer vector in vertebrates. Genome Biol 8 Suppl 1, S7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kawakami, K., Koga, A., Hori, H., Shima, A. (1998). Excision of the tol2 transposable element of the medaka fish, Oryzias latipes, in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Gene 225, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kawakami, K., Noda, T. (2004). Transposition of the Tol2 element, an Ac-like element from the Japanese medaka fish Oryzias latipes, in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genetics 166, 895–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koga, A., Suzuki, M., Inagaki, H., Bessho, Y., Hori, H. (1996). Transposable element in fish. Nature 383, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Momose, T., Tonegawa, A., Takeuchi, J., Ogawa, H., Umesono, K., Yasuda, K. (1999). Efficient targeting of gene expression in chick embryos by microelectroporation. Dev Growth Differ 41, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakamura, H., Katahira, T., Sato, T., Watanabe, Y., Funahashi, J. (2004). Gain- and loss-of-function in chick embryos by electroporation. Mech Dev 121, 1137–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakamura, H., Watanabe, Y., Funahashi, J. (2000). Misexpression of genes in brain vesicles by in ovo electroporation. Dev Growth Differ 42, 199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Niwa, H., Yamamura, K., Miyazaki, J. (1991). Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 108, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sato, Y., Kasai, T., Nakagawa, S., Tanabe, K., Watanabe, T., Kawakami, K., Takahashi, Y. (2007).Stable integration and conditional expression of electroporated transgenes in chicken embryos. Dev Biol 305, 616–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sato, Y., Watanabe, T., Saito, D., Takahashi, T., Yoshida, S., Kohyama, J., Ohata, E., Okano, H.,Takahashi, Y. (2008). Notch mediates the segmental specification of angioblasts in somites and their directed migration toward the dorsal aorta in avian embryos. Dev Cell 14, 890–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sato, Y., Yasuda, K., Takahashi, Y. (2002). Morphological boundary forms by a novel inductive event mediated by Lunatic fringe and Notch during somitic segmentation. Development 129, 3633–3644.Google Scholar
  17. Tanabe, K., Takahashi, Y., Sato, Y., Kawakami, K., Takeichi, M., Nakagawa, S. (2006). Cadherin is required for dendritic morphogenesis and synaptic terminal organization of retinal horizontal cells. Development 133, 4085–4096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Uchikawa, M., Takemoto, T., Kamachi, Y., Kondoh, H. (2004). Efficient identification of regulatory sequences in the chicken genome by a powerful combination of embryo electroporation and genome comparison. Mech Dev 121, 1145–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Urlinger, S., Baron, U., Thellmann, M., Hasan, M. T., Bujard, H., Hillen, W. (2000). Exploring the sequence space for tetracycline-dependent transcriptional activators: novel mutations yield expanded range and sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 7963–7968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Watanabe, T., Saito, D., Tanabe, K., Suetsugu, R., Nakaya, Y., Nakagawa, S., Takahashi, Y. (2007).Tet-on inducible system combined with in ovo electroporation dissects multiple roles of genes in somitogenesis of chicken embryos. Dev Biol 305, 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wolpert, L. (2004). Much more from the chicken's egg than breakfast — a wonderful model system.Mech Dev 121, 1015–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yasuda, K., Momose, T., Takahashi, Y. (2000). Applications of microelectroporation for studies of chick embryogenesis. Dev Growth Differ 42, 203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yasugi, S., Nakamura, H. (2000). Gene transfer into chicken embryos as an effective system of analysis in developmental biology. Dev Growth Differ 42, 195–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biological Imaging CenterBeckman Institute, California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of Biological SciencesNara Institute of Science and TechnologyIkomaJapan

Personalised recommendations