Electroporation of Embryonic Kidney Explants

  • Nicholas Haddad
  • Daniel Houle
  • Indra R. Gupta

Metanephric kidney development in the mouse begins at embryonic day (E) 10.5, when the ureteric bud (UB), an outgrowth of the epithelial nephric duct, invades the neighboring metanephric mesenchyme (MM). The ureteric bud then undergoes a series of branching events to form the collecting duct network of the adult kidney (Fig. 19.1). As each ureteric bud tip forms, the adjacent undifferentiated mesenchyme is induced to epithelialize and form a nephron, the functional unit of the adult kidney that filters waste. Rodent embryonic kidneys can be dissected and cultured as explants such that branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis can be observed ex vivo (Rothenpieler and Dressler, 1993; Vega et al., 1996; Piscione et al., 1997; Gupta et al., 2003).

The roles of signaling molecules and transcription factors during kidney development have been studied in explant cultures by introducing small interfering RNA (Davies et al., 2004), by treating with pharmaceutical agents (Tang et al., 2002), or by using viral transduction to overexpress mutant proteins (Favre et al., 2000). More recently, microinjection followed by electroporation has been used to successfully express plasmid DNA encoding proteins important for ureteric bud induction, branching morphogenesis, and nephrogenesis in the developing kidney (Gao et al., 2005; Self et al., 2006; Alie et al., 2007). This approach allows for both gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments in a high-throughput, cost-effective manner. Tissue-specific effects can also be analyzed: DNA constructs can be delivered to either the metanephric mesenchyme or the ureteric bud lineages to evaluate the primary effects of genetic perturbation within a target cell population. This method can be used to evaluate the function of any gene of interest to determine whether it is then feasible to invest in the creation of more labour-intensive conditional knock-out or knock-in mouse lines. From expression profiling technologies such as microarrays and SAGE, a large number of genes have been implicated in kidney development (Meyer et al., 2004; Schmidt-Ott et al., 2005), yet for most of these genes, their function in organogenesis remains uncharacterized. Microinjection with electroporation therefore provides an economical means to rapidly evaluate the function of previously described genes, and to characterize the role of genes more recently implicated in kidney development.


Pulse Time Kidney Development Enhance Green Fluorescent Protein Expression Metanephric Mesenchyme Nephric Duct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alie TM, Vrljicak PJ, Myburgh DB, Gupta IR (2007) Microinjection and electroporation of embryonic kidney explants: an improved method. Kidney Int 721: 121–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron S, Poast J, Rizzo D, McFarland E, Kieff E (2000) Electroporation of antibodies, DNA,and other macromolecules into cells: a highly efficient method. J Immunol Methods 2421–2:115–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bureau MF, Gehl J, Deleuze V, Mir LM, Scherman D (2000) Importance of association between permeabilization and electrophoretic forces for intramuscular DNA electrotransfer. Biochim Biophys Acta 14743: 353–9Google Scholar
  4. Davies JA, Ladomery M, Hohenstein P, Michael L, Shafe A, Spraggon L, Hastie N (2004) Development of an siRNA-based method for repressing specific genes in renal organ culture and its use to show that the Wt1 tumour suppressor is required for nephron differentiation.Hum Mol Genet 132: 235–46Google Scholar
  5. Favre D, Ferry N, Moullier P (2000) Critical aspects of viral vectors for gene transfer into the kidney.J Am Soc Nephrol 11 Suppl 16: S149–53Google Scholar
  6. Gao X, Chen X, Taglienti M, Rumballe B, Little MH, Kreidberg JA (2005) Angioblast-mesenchyme induction of early kidney development is mediated by Wt1 and Vegfa. Development 13224: 5437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta IR, Lapointe M, Yu OH (2003) Morphogenesis during mouse embryonic kidney explant culture. Kidney Int 631: 365–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laursen CM, Krzyzek RA, Flick CE, Anderson PC, Spencer TM (1994) Production of fertile transgenic maize by electroporation of suspension culture cells. Plant Mol Biol 241: 51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McMahon JM, Signori E, Wells KE, Fazio VM, Wells DJ (2001) Optimisation of electrotransfer of plasmid into skeletal muscle by pretreatment with hyaluronidase — increased expression with reduced muscle damage. Gene Ther 816: 1264–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mennuni C, Calvaruso F, Zampaglione I, Rizzuto G, Rinaudo D, Dammassa E, Ciliberto G, Fattori E,La Monica N (2002) Hyaluronidase increases electrogene transfer efficiency in skeletal muscle.Hum Gene Ther 133: 355–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meyer TN, Schwesinger C, Bush KT, Stuart RO, Rose DW, Shah MM, Vaughn DA, Steer DL,Nigam SK (2004) Spatiotemporal regulation of morphogenetic molecules during in vitro branching of the isolated ureteric bud: toward a model of branching through budding in the developing kidney. Dev Biol 2751: 44–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakamura H and Funahashi J (2001) Introduction of DNA into chick embryos by in ovo electro-poration. Methods 241: 43–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Phez E, Faurie C, Bush KT, Stuart RO, Rose DW, Shah MM, Vaughn DA, Steer DL, Nigam SK (2005) New insights in the visualization of membrane permeabilization and DNA/membrane interaction of cells submitted to electric pulses. Biochim Biophys Acta 17243: 248–54Google Scholar
  14. Piscione TD, Yager TD, Gupta IR, Grinfeld B, Pei Y, Attisano L, Wrana JL, Rosenblum ND (1997) BMP-2 and OP-1 exert direct and opposite effects on renal branching morphogenesis. Am J Physiol 2736 Pt 2: F961–75Google Scholar
  15. Rols MP, Delteil C, Serin G, Teissie J (1994) Temperature effects on electrotransfection of mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 223: 540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rothenpieler UW and Dressler GR (1993) Pax-2 is required for mesenchyme-to-epithelium conversion during kidney development. Development 1193: 711–20Google Scholar
  17. Saito T and Nakatsuji N (2001) Efficient gene transfer into the embryonic mouse brain using in vivo electroporation. Dev Biol 2401: 237–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Satkauskas S, Bureau MF, Puc M, Mahfoudi A, Scherman D, Miklavcic D, Mir LM (2002) Mechanisms of in vivo DNA electrotransfer: respective contributions of cell electropermeabi-lization and DNA electrophoresis. Mol Ther 52: 133–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt-Ott KM, Yang J, Chen X, Wang H, Paragas N, Mori K, Li JY, Lu B, Costantini F, Schiffer M, Bottinger E, Barasch J (2005) Novel regulators of kidney development from the tips of the ureteric bud. J Am Soc Nephrol 167: 1993–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Self M, Lagutin OV, Bowling B, Hendrix J, Cai Y, Dressler GR, Oliver G (2006) Six2 is required for suppression of nephrogenesis and progenitor renewal in the developing kidney. Embo J 2521: 5214–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Takabatake Y, Isaka Y, Mizui M, Kawachi H, Shimizu F, Ito T, Hori M, Imai E (2005) Exploring RNA interference as a therapeutic strategy for renal disease. Gene Ther 1212: 965–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tang MJ, Cai Y, Tsai SJ, Wang YK, Dressler GR (2002) Ureteric bud outgrowth in response to RET activation is mediated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Dev Biol 2431: 128–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsujie M, Isaka Y, Nakamura H, Imai E, Hori M (2001) Electroporation-mediated gene transfer that targets glomeruli. J Am Soc Nephrol 125: 949–54Google Scholar
  24. Vega QC, Worby CA, Lechner MS, Dixon JE, Dressler GR (1996) Glial cell line-derived neuro-trophic factor activates the receptor tyrosine kinase RET and promotes kidney morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 9320: 10657–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vicat JM, Boisseau S, Jourdes P, Laine M, Wion D, Bouali-Benazzouz R, Benabid AL, Berger F (2000) Muscle transfection by electroporation with high-voltage and short-pulse currents provides high-level and long-lasting gene expression. Hum Gene Ther 116: 909–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Haddad
    • 1
  • Daniel Houle
    • 2
  • Indra R. Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human GeneticsMcGill University, Montreal Children's Hospital ' Research InstituteMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre — Transgenic UnitMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations