One key approach toward understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying embryonic development involves the overexpression or misexpression of target genes in specific regions and at specific time points. The mouse gene-knockout system has been used extensively for loss-of-function studies due to the availability of a large number of mutant lines and the technical advantages of this system. In contrast, gain-of-function analyses have been performed through the production of knock-in and transgenic animals and with the use of various viruses (Cornetta 2006; Jakobsson et al., 2003; Hashimoto and Mikoshiba, 2004). However, it is not always possible to express or suppress genes in a spatially and temporally restricted manner, and the generation of genetically modified mice and recombinant viruses is time consuming and labor intensive. With the aim of solving these problems, many attempts have been made to apply the electroporation technique in research on developmental biology. Due to the accessibility of the avian embryo, it has been used as a classic model system for the study of developmental events in vertebrates. A novel technique for successful gene delivery into chick embryos has been established; this technique is known as in ovo electroporation and appears to be an excellent method, permitting quick and direct examination of the function of the delivered genes (Muramatsu et al., 1997; Itasaki et al., 1999; Momose et al., 1999; Nakamura et al., 2000; Yasuda et al., 2000). It seems that this technique can be adapted to the mouse embryo and would permit more rapid functional analysis of genes than is achieved by the generation of knockout or transgenic mouse lines. However, the inaccessibility of embryos in the mammalian uterus renders in utero manipulations targeting precise regions difficult or impossible at most stages of development. Efforts have been undertaken by various researchers to establish an in utero electroporation system, and there have been several reports of systems that enable successful gene delivery into mouse embryos, with time- and region-specific expression (Saito and Nakatsuji, 2001; Tabata and Nakajima, 2001; Borrell et al., 2005).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altman J, Bayer SA (1988). Development of the rat thalamus: II. Time and site of origin and settling pattern of neurons derived from the anterior lobule of the thalamic neuroepithelium. J Comp Neurol 275, 378–405.
Anderson SA, Eisenstat DD, Shi L, Rubenstein JL (1997). Interneuron migration from basal fore-brain to neocortex: dependence on Dlx genes. Science 278, 474–6.
Bar I, Lambert de Rouvroit C, Goffinet AM (2000). The Reelin signaling pathway in mouse cortical development. Eur J Morphol 38, 321–5.
Borrell V, Yoshimura Y, Callaway EM (2005). Targeted gene delivery to telencephalic inhibitory neurons by directional in utero electroporation. J Neurosci Methods 143, 151–8.
Cornetta K, Pollok KE, Miller AD (2006) Retroviral vectors. Gene Transfer. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Chapter 2. 3–21.
Erzurumlu RS, Kind PC (2001). Neural activity: sculptor of ‘barrels’ in the neocortex. Trens Neurosci 24, 589–95.
Feil R, Brocard J, Mascrez B, LeMeur M, Metzger D, Chambon P (1996). Ligand-activated site-specific recombination in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 10887–90.
Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC (1998). Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–11.
Fukuchi-Shimogori T, Grove EA (2001). Neocortex patterning by the secreted signaling molecule FGF8. Science 294, 1071–4.
Fukuchi-Shimogori T, Grove EA (2003). Emx2 patterns the neocortex by regulating FGF positional signaling. Nat Neurosci 6, 825–31.
Grove EA, Tole S, Limon J, Yip L, Ragsdale CW (1998). The hem of the embryonic cerebral cortex is defined by the expression of multiple Wnt genes and is compromised in Gli3-deficient mice. Development 125, 2315–25.
Hashimoto M, Mikoshiba K (2004). Neuronal birthdate-specific gene transfer with adenoviral vectors. J Neurosci 24, 286–96.
Indra AK, Warot X, Brocard J, Bornert JM, Xiao JH, Chambon P, Metzger D (1999). Temporally-controlled site-specific mutagenesis in the basal layer of the epidermis: comparison of the recombinase activity of the tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ER(T) and Cre-ER(T2) recombinases. Nucleic Acids Res 27, 4324–7.
Itasaki N, Bel-Vialar S, Krumlauf R (1999). ‘Shocking’ developments in chick embryology: elec-troporation and in ovo gene expression. Nat Cell Biol 1, 203–7.
Jakobsson J, Ericson C, Jansson M, Björk E, Lundberg C (2003). Targeted transgene expression in rat brain using lentiviral vectors. J Neurosci Res 73, 876–85.
Lois C, GarcÃa-Verdugo JM, Alvarez-Buylla A (1996). Chain migration of neuronal precursors. Science 271, 978–81.
Maxwell IH, Maxwell F, Glode LM (1986). Regulated expression of a diphtheria toxin A-chain gene transfected into human cells: possible strategy for inducing cancer cell suicide. Cancer Res 46, 4660–4.
Momose T, Tonegawa A, Takeuchi J, Ogawa H, Umesono K, Yasuda K (1999). Efficient targeting of gene expression in chick embryos by microelectroporation. Dev Growth Differ 41, 335–44.
Muramatsu T, Shibata O, Ryoki S, Ohmori Y, Okumura J (1997). Foreign gene expression in the mouse testis by localized in vivo gene transfer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 233, 45–9.
Nakamura H, Watanabe Y, Funahashi J (2000). Misexpression of genes in brain vesicles by in ovo electroporation. Dev Growth Differ 42, 199–201.
Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofscneider PH (1982). Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1, 841–5.
Remedios R, Huilgol D, Saha B, Hari P, Bhatnagar L, Kowalczyk T, Hevner RF, Suda Y, Aizawa S, Ohshima T, Stoykova A, Tole S (2007). A stream of cells migrating from the caudal telen-cephalon reveals a link between the amygdala and neocortex. Nat Neurosci 10, 1141–50.
Remedios R, Subramanian L, Tole S (2004). LIM genes parcellate the embryonic amygdala and regulate its development. J Neurosci 24, 6986–90.
Saito T, Nakatsuji N (2001). Efficient gene transfer into the embryonic mouse brain using in vivo electroporation. Dev Biol 240, 237–46.
Shimogori T, Banuchi V, Ng H Y, Strauss JB, Grove EA (2004). Embryonic signaling centers expressing BMP, WNT and FGF proteins interact to pattern the cerebral cortex. Development 131, 5639–47.
Shimogori T, Ogawa M (2008). Gene application with in utero electroporation in mouse embryonic brain. Dev Growth Differ 50, 499–506.
Soriano P (1999). Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21, 70–1.
Tabata H, Nakajima K (2001). Efficient in utero gene transfer system to the developing mouse brain using electroporation: visualization of neuronal migration in the developing cortex. Neuroscience 103, 865–72.
Tsien JZ, Chen DF, Gerber D, Tom C, Mercer EH, Anderson DJ, Mayford M, Kandel ER, Tonegawa S (1996). Subregion- and cell type-restricted gene knockout in mouse brain. Cell 87, 1317–26.
Wang CL, Zhang L, Zhou Y, Zhou J, Yang XJ, Duan SM, Xiong ZQ, Ding YQ (2007). Activity-dependent development of callosal projections in the somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci 27, 11334–42.
Yasuda K, Momose T, Takahashi Y (2000). Applications of microelectroporation for studies of chick embryogenesis. Dev Growth Differ 42, 203–6.
Yoshida M, Assimacopoulos S, Jones KR, Grove EA (2006). Massive loss of Cajal-Retzius cells does not disrupt neocortical layer order. Development 133, 537–45.
Young-Pearse TL, Bai J, Chang R, Zheng JB, LoTurco JJ, Selkoe DJ (2007). A critical function for beta-amyloid precursor protein in neuronal migration revealed by in utero RNA interference. J Neurosci 27, 14459–69.
Zhao C, Guan W, Pleasure SJ (2006). A transgenic marker mouse line labels Cajal-Retzius cells from the cortical hem and thalamocortical axons. Brain Res 1077, 48–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shimogori, T., Ogawa, M. (2009). Practical Application of Microelectroporation into Developing Mouse Brain. In: Nakamura, H. (eds) Electroporation and Sonoporation in Developmental Biology. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-09427-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-09427-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-09426-5
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-09427-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)