Advertisement

Electroporation into Cultured Mammalian Embryos

  • Tadashi Nomura
  • Masanori Takahashi
  • Noriko Osumi

Over the last century, mammalian embryos have been used extensively as a common animal model to investigate fundamental questions in the field of developmental biology. More recently, the establishment of transgenic and gene-targeting systems in laboratory mice has enabled researchers to unveil the genetic mechanisms under lying complex developmental processes (Mak, 2007). However, our understanding of cell—cell interactions and their molecular basis in the early stages of mammalian embryogenesis is still very fragmentary. One of the major problems is the difficulty of precise manipulation and limited accessibility to mammalian embryos via uterus wall. Unfortunately, existing tissue and organotypic culture systems per se do not fully recapitulate three-dimensional, dynamic processes of organogenesis observed in vivo. Although transgenic animal technology and virus-mediated gene delivery are useful to manipulate gene expression, these techniques take much time and financial costs, which limit their use.

Whole-embryo mammalian culture system was established by New and colleague in the 1970s, and was modified thereafter by several researchers (reviewed by New, 1971, 1978; Sturm and Tam, 1993; Hogan et al., 1994; Eto and Osumi-Yamashita, 1995; Tam, 1998). At first, the whole-embryo culture system was used in the field of teratology, and then applied in a variety of developmental biology fields, because this system well maintains the embryonic growth and morphogenesis that are comparable to those in utero, and dramatically improves accessibility to the early fetal stages. Furthermore, in combination with gene-delivery techniques such as electroporation, gene expression can be manipulated in a tissue- and region-specific manner (Osumi and Inoue, 2001; Takahashi et al., 2002). Here we introduce this combinatorial proce dure applying of the electroporation technique to whole-embryo culture system. We then illustrate the use of this approach in the developmental neurobiology by present ing our findings on molecular mechanisms controlling stem cell maintenance and neuronal migration in the embryonic cortex. Finally, we will discuss future directions and a potential widespread value of this method in developmental biology.

Keywords

Neuronal Migration Neuroepithelial Cell Mammalian Embryo Olfactory Cortex Lateral Olfactory Tract 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arai Y, Funatsu N, Numayama-Tsuruta K, Nomura T, Nakamura S, Osumi N (2005) Role of Fabp7, a downstream gene of Pax6, in the maintenance of neuroepithelial cells during early embryonic development of the rat cortex. J Neurosci 25:9752–9761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnabe-Heider F, Meletis K, Eriksson M, Bergmann O, Sabelstrom H, Harvey MA, Mikkers H, Frisen J (2008) Genetic manipulation of adult mouse neurogenic niches by in vivo electropora-tion. Nat Methods 5:189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bielle F, Griveau A, Narboux-Neme N, Vigneau S, Sigrist M, Arber S, Wassef M, Pierani A (2005) Multiple origins of Cajal-Retzius cells at the borders of the developing pallium. Nat Neurosci 8:1002–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borrell V, Marin O (2006) Meninges control tangential migration of hem-derived Cajal-Retzius cells via CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling. Nat Neurosci 9:1284–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calegari F, Haubensak W, Yang D, Huttner WB, Buchholz F (2002) Tissue-specific RNA inter ference in postimplantation mouse embryos with endoribonuclease-prepared short interfering RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:14236–14240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calegari F, Marzesco AM, Kittler R, Buchholz F, Huttner WB (2004) Tissue-specific RNA interference in post-implantation mouse embryos using directional electroporation and whole embryo culture. Differentiation 72:92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaerts P, Halder G, Gehring WJ (1997) PAX-6 in development and evolution. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:483–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caviness VS, Jr., Takahashi T (1995) Proliferative events in the cerebral ventricular zone. Brain Dev 17:159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caviness VS, Jr., Takahashi T, Nowakowski RS (2000) Neuronogenesis and the early events of neocortical histogenesis. Results Probl Cell Differ 30:107–143.Google Scholar
  10. Cockroft DL (1976) Comparison of in vitro and in vivo development of rat foetuses. Dev Biol 48:163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson BP, Tsang TE, Khoo PL, Gad JM, Tam PP (2003) Introduction of cell markers into germ layer tissues of the mouse gastrula by whole embryo electroporation. Genesis 35:57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Estivill-Torrus G, Vitalis T, Fernandez-Llebrez P, Price DJ (2001) The transcription factor Pax6 is required for development of the diencephalic dorsal midline secretory radial glia that form the subcommissural organ. Mech Dev 109:215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eto K, Osumi-Yamashita N (1995) Whole embryo culture and the study of post-implantation mammalian development. Dev Growth Differ 37:123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eto K, Takakubo F (1985) Improved development of rat embryos in culture during the period of craniofacial morphogenesis. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 5:351–355.Google Scholar
  15. Garcia-Moreno F, Lopez-Mascaraque L, De Carlos JA (2007a) Origins and migratory routes of murine Cajal-Retzius cells. J Comp Neurol 500:419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia-Moreno F, Lopez-Mascaraque L, de Carlos JA (2007b) Early Telencephalic Migration Topographically Converging in the Olfactory Cortex. Cereb Cortex 18:1239–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giroux SJ, Alves-Leiva C, Lecluse Y, Martin P, Albagli O, Godin I (2007) Gene transfer to pre-hematopoietic and committed hematopoietic precursors in the early mouse yolk sac: a compar ative study between in situ electroporation and retroviral transduction. BMC Dev Biol 7:79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hogan BLM, Beddington RSP, Constantini F, Lucy E (1994) Manipulating the mouse embryo. A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory New York.Google Scholar
  19. Inoue T, Krumlauf R (2001) An impulse to the brain — using in vivo electroporation. Nat Neurosci 4 Suppl:1156–1158.Google Scholar
  20. Inoue T, Nakamura S, Osumi N (2000) Fate mapping of the mouse prosencephalic neural plate. Dev Biol 219:373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inoue T, Tanaka T, Takeichi M, Chisaka O, Nakamura S, Osumi N (2001) Role of cadherins in maintaining the compartment boundary between the cortex and striatum during development. Development 128:561–569.Google Scholar
  22. Itasaki N, Bel-Vialar S, Krumlauf R (1999) ‘Shocking’ developments in chick embryology: elec troporation and in ovo gene expression. Nat Cell Biol 1:E203–E207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kawasaki T, Ito K, Hirata T (2006) Netrin 1 regulates ventral tangential migration of guidepost neurons in the lateral olfactory tract. Development 133:845–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kriegstein AR, Noctor SC (2004) Patterns of neuronal migration in the embryonic cortex. Trends Neurosci 27:392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee YM, Osumi-Yamashita N, Ninomiya Y, Moon CK, Eriksson U, Eto K (1995) Retinoic acid stage-dependently alters the migration pattern and identity of hindbrain neural crest cells. Development 121:825–837.Google Scholar
  26. Maekawa M, Takashima N, Arai Y, Nomura T, Inokuchi K, Yuasa S, Osumi N (2005) Pax6 is required for production and maintenance of progenitor cells in postnatal hippocampal neuro genesis. Genes Cells 10:1001–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mak TW (2007) Gene targeting in embryonic stem cells scores a knockout in Stockholm. Cell 131:1027–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marin O, Rubenstein JL (2003) Cell migration in the forebrain. Annu Rev Neurosci 26:441–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsuda T, Cepko CL (2007) Controlled expression of transgenes introduced by in vivo electro poration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:1027–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McConnell SK (1995) Constructing the cerebral cortex: neurogenesis and fate determination. Neuron 15:761–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller FD, Gauthier AS (2007) Timing is everything: making neurons versus glia in the developing cortex. Neuron 54:357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Molyneaux BJ, Arlotta P, Menezes JR, Macklis JD (2007) Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. New DAT (1971) Studies on mammalian fetuses in vitro during the period of organogenesis. In: Austin C (Ed) The Mammalian Fetuses In Vitro. Chapman and Hall, London: pp. 15–65.Google Scholar
  34. New DA (1978) Whole-embryo culture and the study of mammalian embryos during organo genesis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 53:81–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. New DA, Coppola PT, Cockroft DL (1976) Improved development of head-fold rat embryos in culture resulting from low oxygen and modifications of the culture serum. J Reprod Fertil 48:219–222.Google Scholar
  36. Nieuwenhuys R (1994) The neocortex. An overview of its evolutionary development, structural organization and synaptology. Anat Embryol (Berl) 190:307–337.Google Scholar
  37. Nomura T, Osumi N (2004) Misrouting of mitral cell progenitors in the Pax6/small eye rat telen cephalon. Development 131:787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nomura T, Osumi N (2007) Manipulating mammalian embryos for research on the developing cerebral cortex. In: Esashi M, Ishii K, Ohuchi N, Osumi N, Sato M, and Tamaguchi T (Eds) Future Medical Engineering Based on Bionano Technology: Proc Final Symp Tohoku Univ 21th COE Prog, Imperial College: pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
  39. Nomura T, Holmberg J, Frisen J, Osumi N (2006) Pax6-dependent boundary defines alignment of migrating olfactory cortex neurons via the repulsive activity of ephrin A5. Development 133:1335–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nomura T, Haba H, Osumi N (2007) Role of a transcription factor Pax6 in the developing verte brate olfactory system. Dev Growth Differ 49:683–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Osumi N (2001) The role of Pax6 in brain patterning. Tohoku J Exp Med 193:163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Osumi N, Inoue T (2001) Gene transfer into cultured mammalian embryos by electroporation. Methods 24:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Osumi-Yamashita N (1996) Retinoic acid and mammalian craniofacial morphogenesis. J Biosci 21:313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osumi-Yamashita N, Ninomiya Y, Doi H, Eto K (1994) The contribution of both forebrain and midbrain crest cells to the mesenchyme in the frontonasal mass of mouse embryos. Dev Biol 164:409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pierreux CE, Poll AV, Jacquemin P, Lemaigre FP, Rousseau GG (2005) Gene transfer into mouse prepancreatic endoderm by whole embryo electroporation. JOP 6:128–135.Google Scholar
  46. Saito T, Nakatsuji N (2001) Efficient gene transfer into the embryonic mouse brain using in vivo electroporation. Dev Biol 240:237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sato Y, Hirata T, Ogawa M, Fujisawa H (1998) Requirement for early-generated neurons recognized by monoclonal antibody lot1 in the formation of lateral olfactory tract. J Neurosci 18:7800–7810.Google Scholar
  48. Scardigli R, Baumer N, Gruss P, Guillemot F, Le Roux I (2003) Direct and concentration- dependent regulation of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 by Pax6. Development 130:3269–3281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simpson TI, Price DJ (2002) Pax6; a pleiotropic player in development. Bioessays 24:1041–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sturm K, Tam PP (1993) Isolation and culture of whole postimplantation embryos and germ layer derivatives. Methods Enzymol 225:164–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Takahashi M, Osumi N (2002) Pax6 regulates specification of ventral neuron subtypes in the hindbrain by establishing progenitor domains. Development 129:1327–1338.Google Scholar
  52. Takahashi M, Sato K, Nomura T, Osumi N (2002) Manipulating gene expressions by electropora tion in the developing brain of mammalian embryos. Differentiation 70:155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Takahashi T, Nowakowski RS, Caviness VS, Jr. (1995) The cell cycle of the pseudostratified ventricular epithelium of the embryonic murine cerebral wall. J Neurosci 15:6046–6057.Google Scholar
  54. Takiguchi-Hayashi K, Sekiguchi M, Ashigaki S, Takamatsu M, Hasegawa H, Suzuki-Migishima R, Yokoyama M, Nakanishi S, Tanabe Y (2004) Generation of reelin-positive marginal zone cells from the caudomedial wall of telencephalic vesicles. J Neurosci 24:2286–2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tam PP (1998) Postimplantation mouse development: whole embryo culture and micro manipulation. Int J Dev Biol 42:895–902.Google Scholar
  56. Tomioka N, Osumi N, Sato Y, Inoue T, Nakamura S, Fujisawa H, Hirata T (2000) Neocortical origin and tangential migration of guidepost neurons in the lateral olfactory tract. J Neurosci 20:5802–5812.Google Scholar
  57. Walther C, Gruss P (1991) Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. Development 113:1435–1449.Google Scholar
  58. Warren N, Caric D, Pratt T, Clausen JA, Asavaritikrai P, Mason JO, Hill RE, Price DJ (1999) The transcription factor, Pax6, is required for cell proliferation and differentiation in the developing cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 9:627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ybot-Gonzalez P, Savery D, Gerrelli D, Signore M, Mitchell CE, Faux CH, Greene ND, Copp AJ (2007) Convergent extension, planar-cell-polarity signalling and initiation of mouse neural tube closure. Development 134:789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yoshida M, Assimacopoulos S, Jones KR, Grove EA (2006) Massive loss of Cajal-Retzius cells does not disrupt neocortical layer order. Development 133:537–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yozu M, Tabata H, Nakajima K (2005) The caudal migratory stream: a novel migratory stream of interneurons derived from the caudal ganglionic eminence in the developing mouse forebrain. J Neurosci 25:7268–7277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tadashi Nomura
    • 1
  • Masanori Takahashi
    • 2
  • Noriko Osumi
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Cell and Molecular BiologyKarolinska InstituteSweden
  2. 2.Department of Developmental Neuroscience, Center for Translational and Advanced Animal ResearchTohoku University Graduate School of MedicineAoba-kuJapan
  3. 3.Core Research for Evolutionary Science and TechnologyJapan Science and Technology AgencyKawaguchiJapan

Personalised recommendations