Clonal and Widespread Gene Transfer by Proviral Electroporation for Analysis of Brain Laminar Formation

  • Sayaka Sugiyama
  • Harukazu Nakamura

An essential approach to understanding the mechanisms of development is to alter a gene function/expression. In vivo electroporation has been adapted as one such technique (Muramatsu et al., 1997). It is a very useful tool to achieve a gain- and loss-of-function (by using RNAi or morpholinos) of a gene of interest (Funahashi et al., 1999; Fukuchi-Shimogori and Grove, 2001; Kos et al., 2001; Katahira and Nakamura, 2003; Sugiyama and Nakamura, 2003). The technique has allowed the altering of gene expression temporally and spatially. Pulse-labeling technique is an approach to manipulate a specific cell population temporally, depending on its birthday, as this chapter describes. This technique is more advantageous over the BrdU application, as it can reveal cell lineage; it also has the ability to manipulate a gain- and loss-of-function into specific precursor cells (Tabata and Nakajima, 2001; Sugiyama and Nakamura, 2003; Huber et al., 2008).

In spatial terms, widespread gene transfer by electroporation has provided an efficient way to unveil a new gene function on a given tissue (Nakamura and Funahashi, 2001). On the other hand, the spatial precision of gene transfer also has been addressed as each individual cell responds differently to gene expression. Thus, there has been increasing efforts to improve electrodes and create new techniques such as single-cell electroporation (Haas et al., 2001; Kitamura et al., 2008).


Optic Tectum Neuroepithelial Cell Morpholino Oligonucleotide Tungsten Microelectrode Deep Lamina 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aihara, H., Miyazaki, J. (1998). Gene transfer into muscle by electroporation in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 16, 867–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cepko, C. (1988). Retrovirus vectors and their applications in neurobiology. Neuron 1, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cepko, C. L., Ryder, E., Austin, C., Golden, J., Fields-Berry, S., Lin, J. (2000). Lineage analysis with retroviral vectors. Methods Enzymol 327, 118–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fukuchi-Shimogori, T., Grove, E. A. (2001). Neocortex patterning by the secreted signaling mol ecule FGF8. Science 294, 1071–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Funahashi, J., Okafuji, T., Ohuchi, H., Noji, S., Tanaka, H., Nakamura, H. (1999). Role of Pax-5 in the regulation of a mid-hindbrain organizer's activity. Dev Growth Differ 41, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray, G. E., Sanes, J. R. (1991). Migratory paths and phenotypic choices of clonally related cells in the avian optic tectum. Neuron 6, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haas, K., Sin, W. C., Javaherian, A., Li, Z., Cline, H. T. (2001). Single-cell electroporation for gene transfer in vivo. Neuron 29, 583–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamburger, V., Hamilton, H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88, 49–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huber, D., Petreanu, L., Ghitani, N., Ranade, S., Hromádka, T., Mainen, Z., Svoboda, K. (2008). Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice. Nature 451, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hughes, S. H., Greenhouse, J. J., Petropoulos, C. J., Sutrave, P. (1987). Adaptor plasmids simplify the insertion of foreign DNA into helper-independent retroviral vectors. J Virol 61, 3004–3012.Google Scholar
  11. Itasaki, N., Nakamura, H. (1996). A role for gradient en expression in positional specification on the optic tectum. Neuron 16, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katahira, T., Nakamura, H. (2003). Gene silencing in chick embryos with a vector-based small interfering RNA system. Dev Growth Differ 45, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kishimoto, K. N., Watanabe, Y., Nakamura, H., Kokubun, S. (2002). Ectopic bone formation by electroporatic transfer of bone morphogenetic protein-4 gene. Bone 31, 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitamura, K., Judkewitz, B., Kano, M., Denk, W., Häusser, M. (2008). Targeted patch-clamp record ings and single-cell electroporation of unlabeled neurons in vivo. Nat Methods 5, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kos, R., Reedy, M. V., Johnson, R. L., Erickson, C. A. (2001). The winged-helix transcription fac tor FoxD3 is important for establishing the neural crest lineage and repressing melanogenesis in avian embryos. Development 128, 1467–1479.Google Scholar
  16. LaVail, J. H., Cowan, W. M. (1971). The development of the chick optic tectum. II. Autoradiographic studies. Brain Res 28, 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Momose, T., Tonegawa, A., Takeuchi, J., Ogawa, H., Umesono, K., Yasuda, K. (1999). Efficient targeting of gene expression in chick embryos by microelectroporation. Dev Growth Differ 41, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muramatsu, T., Mizutani, Y., Ohmori, Y., Okumura, J. (1997). Comparison of three nonviral transfection methods for foreign gene expression in early chicken embryos in ovo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 230, 376–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagayama, S., Zeng, S., Xiong, W., Fletcher, M. L., Masurkar, A. V., Davis, D. J., Pieribone, V. A., Chen, W. R. (2007). In vivo simultaneous tracing and Ca(2+) imaging of local neuronal circuits. Neuron 53, 789–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakamura, H., Funahashi, J. (2001). Introduction of DNA into chick embryos by in ovo electro poration. Methods 24, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakamura, H., Sugiyama, S. (2004). Polarity and laminar formation of the optic tectum in relation to retinal projection. J Neurobiol 59, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Suemori, H., Kadodawa, Y., Goto, K., Araki, I., Kondoh, H., Nakatsuji, N. (1990). A mouse embryonic stem cell line showing pluripotency of differentiation in early embryos and ubiqui tous betagalactosidase expression. Cell Differ Dev 29, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sugiyama, S., Funahashi, J., Nakamura, H. (2000). Antagonizing activity of chick Grg4 against tectum-organizing activity. Dev Biol 221, 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sugiyama, S., Nakamura, H. (2003). The role of Grg4 in tectal laminar formation. Development 130, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Summerton, J. (1999). Morpholino antisense oligomers: the case for an RNase H-independent structural type. Biochim Biophys Acta 1489, 141–158.Google Scholar
  26. Tabata, H., Nakajima, K. (2001) Efficient in utero gene transfer system to the developing mouse brain using electroporation: Visualization of neuronal migration in the developing cortex. Neuroscience 103, 865–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Umeshima, H., Hirano, T., Kengaku, M. (2007). Microtubule-based nuclear movement occurs independently of centrosome positioning in migrating neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 16182–16187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wickersham, I. R., Lyon, D. C., Barnard, R. J. O., Mori, T., Finke, S., Conzelmann, K., Young, J. A. T., Callaway, E. M. (2007). Monosynaptic restriction of transsynaptic tracing from single, genetically targeted neurons. Neuron 53, 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital BostonHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations