Advertisement

Sustainability from women’s point of view: Building blocks for the analysis of conflicts of interest

  • Heidi Wittmer
Part of the Frauen · Gesellschaft · Kritik book series (FGK)

Abstract

The concept of sustainable development combines three dimensions: economic development, equity and environmental sustainability. Between these dimensions there are complementarities and trade-offs. My presentation relates to conflicts between the social and economic interests of woman and the protection of natural resources. It thereby refers directly to chapter 24.8 (d) of the Agenda 21 which explicitly formulates „the analysis of the structural linkages between gender relations, environment and development“ as a task for research, data collection and dissemination of information.

Keywords

Gender Relation Gender Division Sustainable Agricultural Practice Patriarchal Ideology Scarce Natural Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Agarwal, B. (1997): Gender, Environment, and Poverty Interlinks: Regional Variations and Temporal Shifts in Rural India, 1971–91. In: World Development 25(1): 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birner, R. (1998, forthcoming): The Political Economy of Change in Property Regimes.Google Scholar
  3. Bliss, F. (1996): FrauenBäume: Wie Frauen in der Dritten Welt eine lebenswichtige Ressource nutzen. Bonn.Google Scholar
  4. Braidotti, R., et al. (1994): Women, the Environment, and Sustainable Development: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis. London.Google Scholar
  5. Folbre, N. (1997): Gender Coalitions: Extrafamily Influences on Intrafamily Inequality. In: Haddad, L./ Hoddinott, J./ Alderman, H. (ed.): Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries. Models, Methods, and Policy. IFPRI, Baltimore: 263–274.Google Scholar
  6. Green, C. (1994) Poverty, Population and Environment: Does Synergism work for Women? IDS Discussion paper 343.Google Scholar
  7. Jackson, C. (1993 a) Doing What Comes Naturally? Women and Environment in Development. In: World Development 21(12): 1947–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jackson, C. (1993b) Environmentalisms and Gender Interests in the Third World. Development and Change 24: 649–677.Google Scholar
  9. Joekes, S., et al. (1995) (Ed): Gender Relations and Environmental Change. In: IDS-Bulletin 26(1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonasdottir, A. (1988): On the Concept of Interest, Women’s Interests, and the Limitations of Interest Theory. In: Jones, K./ Jonasdottir, A. (ed.): The Political Interests of Gender. Developing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. London, New Delhi: 33–66.Google Scholar
  11. Moser, C. (1993): Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practise and Training. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rocheleau, D./Jama, M./Wamalwa-Muragori, B. (1995): Gender, Ecology, and Agro-forestry: Science and Survival in Kathama. In: Thomas-Slayter, B./ Rocheleau, D. (ed.): Gender, Environment, and Development in Kenya. A Grassroots Perspective. Boulder, London: 47–73.Google Scholar
  13. Rodenberg, B. (1994): Mehr als Überlebenspragmatismus — Zur Handlungsrationalität von Frauen in der Ökologiebewegung. In: Entwicklungsethnologie 3(2): 56–65.Google Scholar
  14. Sen, A. (1990): Gender and Cooperative Conflicts. In: Tinker, I. (ed.): Persistent Inequalities. Women and World Development. Oxford: 123–149.Google Scholar
  15. Wieringa, S. (1994): Women’s Interests and Empowerment: Gender Planning Reconsidered. In: Development and Change 25(4): 829–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zein-Elabdin (1996): Development, Gender, and the Environment: Theoretical or Contextual Link? Toward an Institutional Analysis of Gender. In: Journal of Economic Issues 30(4): 927–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Centaurus Verlag & Media UG 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heidi Wittmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Rural DevelopmentGeorg August University GöttingenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations