Of bail-outs and bankruptcies: An empirical study of distressed debt restructurings in Germany


A firm that needs to restructure its debt in order to avoid or remedy a default essentially faces a choice between two alternatives. It may privately renegotiate the affected debt claims in a workout or file a formal bankruptcy petition to resolve financial distress through an in-court proceeding. Financial scholars have long been engaged in discussing the relative merits and shortfalls of both alternatives. Bankruptcy, in general, has the advantage that it protects a distressed debtor from the ‘harassment’ of creditors and mitigates hold-out and information problems among different classes of claimholders [e.g. (1982), (1991)]. In a private workout, on the other hand, firms are likely to avoid much of the direct and indirect costs associated with a formal proceeding [e.g. (1989), (1990)]. This suggests that a firm will choose the workout option if settling this way leaves the firm appreciably more valuable and if unanimous consent among all claimants is feasible. If, however, the affected parties cannot agree on how to share the alleged benefits associated with settling out-of-court, then formal bankruptcy may be the dominant option even though the combined wealth of all parties is ultimately lower [e.g. (1989), (1989)]. Yet, despite these relatively precise predictions provided by theory, empirical results have remained sparse and inconclusive. In particular, there exists little evidence on how firms actually choose between an in- and out-of-court resolution of distress, and to what extend firm value is affected by that choice. Moreover, we currently know little about how the choice between workout and bankruptcy is affected by the design of national bankruptcy legislation. Much of this lack of evidence is attributable to the difficulty to obtain exhaustive data.1 This holds especially for corporate Germany where, until fairly recently, most of the restructuring activity occurred without public disclosure.2


Stock Return Abnormal Return Public Debt Market Reaction Trade Credit 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography for Chapter 4

  1. Altman, E. I. (1984): “A Further Empirical Investigation of the Bankruptcy Costs Question,” The Journal of Finance, 39, 1067–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, J. S., J. H. Chua, and J. J. McConnell (1982): “The Administrative Costs of Bankruptcy: A Note,” The Journal of Finance, 37, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asquith, P., R. Gertner, and D. Soharfstein (1994): “Anatomy of Financial Distress: An Examination of Junk-Bond Issuers,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 625–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berglöf, E., and E.-L. Von Thadden (1994): “Short-Term Versus Long-Term Interests: Capital Structure with Multiple Investors,” The Quartlerly Journal of Economics, 109, 1055–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigus, J. (2002): “Bankruptcy Law, Asset Substitution Problem, and Creditor Conflicts,” International Review of Law and Economics, 22, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolton, P., and D. S. Soharfstein (1996): “Optimal Debt Structure and the Number of Creditors,” The Journal of Political Economy, 104, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, M., and M. Rosenzweig (1992): “The Untenable Case for Chapter 11,” The Yale Law Journal, 101, 1043–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breuer, W. (2003): Insolvenzrecht. Eine Einführung. Beck, München.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, D. T. (1989): “Claimholder Incentive Conflicts in Reorganization: The Role of Bankruptcy Law,” The Review of Financial Studies, 2, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, S., and J. Warner (1985): “Using Daily Stock Returns in Event Studies,” Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brüchner, T. (1998): Reorganisationstrategien für insolvenzbedrohte Unternehmen. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  12. Brunner, A., and J. P. Krahnen (2002): “Multiple Lenders and Corporate Distress: Evidence on Debt Restructuring,” Working Paper, Goethe University Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  13. Bulow, J. I., and J. B. Shoven (1978): “The Bankruptcy Decision,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, S., U. S. Dhillon, and G. G. Ramírez (1996): “Resolution of Financial Distress: Debt Restructurings Via Chapterll, Prepackaged Bankruptcies, and Workouts,” Financial Management, 25, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chatterjee, S., U. S. Dhillon, and G. G. Ramirez (2004): “Debtor-in-Possession Financing,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 3097–3111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chatterjee, S., A. Hadi, and B. Price (2000): Regression Analysis by Example John Wiley and Sons, New York, 3rd edn.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, Y., J. F. Weston, and E. I. Altman (1995): “Financial Distress and Restructuring Models,” Financial Management, 24, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon (1993): Estimation and Inference in Econometrics Oxford University Press, New York. N.Y.Google Scholar
  19. Davydenko, S. A., and J. R. Franks (2004): “Do Bankruptcy Codes Matter? A Study of Defaults in France, Germany, and the UK,” Working Paper, London Business School.Google Scholar
  20. DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D. J. Skinner (1994): “Accounting Choice in Troubled Companies,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo (1994): “Debt Covenant Violation and Manipulation of Accruals,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 145–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Finsterer, H. (1999): Unternehmenssanierung Durch Kreditinstitute: Eine Untersuchung unter Beachtung der Insolvenzordnung. Gabler, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  23. Franke, G. (1983): „Ökonomische Überlegungen zur Gestaltung eines gerichtlichen Sanierungsverfahrens,“ Konkurs-, Treuhand-und Schiedsgerichtswesen, 44, 35–37.Google Scholar
  24. Franks, J. R., K. Nyborg, and W. Torous (1996): “A Comparison of US, UK, and German Insolvency Codes,” Financial Management, 25, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franks, J. R., and W. N. Torous (1989): “An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Firms in Reorganization,” The Journal of Finance, 44, 747–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gertner, R., and D. Scharfstein (1991): “A Theory of Workouts and the Effects of Reorganization Law,” The Journal of Finance, 46, 1189–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giammarino, R. M. (1989): “The Resolution of Financial Distress,” The Review of Financial Studies, 2, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilson, S. C. (1990): “Bankruptcy, Boards, Banks, and Blockholders,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. -(1997): “Transaction Costs and Capital Structure Choice: Evidence from Financially Distressed Firms,” The Journal of Finance, 52, 161–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gilson, S. C., K. John, and L. H. Lang (1990): “Troubled Debt Restructurings, An Empirical Study of Private Reorganization of Firms in Default,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 315–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harhoff, D., K. Stahl, and M. Woywode (1998): “Legal Forms, Growth and Exit of West German Firms-Empirical Results for Manufactoring, Construction, Trade and Service Industries,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 453–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heinkel, R., and J. Zechner (1993): “Financial Distress and Optimal Capital Structure Adjustments,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2, 531–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hotchkiss, E. S. (1995): “Postbankruptcy Performance and Management Turnover,” The Journal of Finance, 50, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jackson, T. (1982): “Bankruptcy, Non-Bankruptcy Entitlements, and the Creditors Bargain,” Yale Law Journal, 91, 857–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. James, C. (1995): “When Do Banks Take Equity in Debt Restructurings?,” The Review of Financial Studies, 8, 1209–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jensen, M. C. (1989): “Active Investors, LBO’s and Privatization of Bankruptcy,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jensen, M. C., and W. Meokling (1976): “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaiser, K. M. (1996): “European Bankruptcy Laws: Implications for Coporations Facing Financial Distress,” Financial Management, 25, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kiefer, R. (2003): “Essays on Corporate Distress and the German Financial System,” Ph.D. thesis, European University Institute Florence.Google Scholar
  40. Longhofer, S. D., and S. R. Peters (1999): “Protection for Whom? Creditor Conflicts in Bankruptcy,” Working Paper 9909, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.Google Scholar
  41. Maddala, G. S. (1992): Introduction to Econometrics. Macmillan, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  42. Manski, C., and D. McFadden (1983): “Alternative Estimators and Sample Designs for Discrete Choice Analysis,” in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, ed. by C. Manski, and D. McFadden, pp. 2–50. MIT Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  43. McFadden, D. (1973): “Conditional Logit Analysis in Qualitative Choice Behavior,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. by P. Zarembka, pp. 105–142. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  44. Myers, S. C. (1977): “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing,” Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakamura, A., and M. Nakamura (1981): “On the Relationships Among Several Specification Error Tests Presented by Durbin, Wu, and Hausman,” Econometrica, 49, 1583–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ofek, E. (1993): “Capital Structure and Firm Response to Poor Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 34, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pindyck, R. S., and D. L. Rubinfeld (1998): Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  48. Ritter, J. R. (1991): “The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings,” The Journal of Finance, 46, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ritter, W. (2000): Unternehmenssanierung im Neuen Insolvenzrecht. Verlag Wissenschaft und Praxis, Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar
  50. Roe, M. (1987): “The Voting Prohibition in Bond Workouts,” Yale Law Review, 97, 232–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soholes, M., and J. Williams (1977): “Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data,” Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Senbet, L. W., and J. K. Seward (1995): “Financial Distress, Bankruptcy and Reorganization,” in Finance, ed. by R. A. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic, and W. T. Ziemba, pp. 921–957, Amsterdam, N.H. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, C., and J. Warner (1979): “On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants,” Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 117–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Warner, J. B. (1977): “Bankruptcy Costs: Some Evidence,” The Journal of Finance, 32, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weiss, L. A. (1990): “Priority of Claims and Ex-Post Recontracting in Bankruptcy,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. White, M. J. (1980): “Public Policy Toward Bankruptcy: Me-First and Other Priority Rules,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 550–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wruck, K. H. (1990): “Financial Distress, Reorganization, and Organizational Efficiency,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2007

Personalised recommendations