The goal of this thesis was to advance the theory of marketing project with a conceptual framework that allows for a theoretically and empirically consistent description of marketing as a societal phenomenon, considers all practical and theoretical interests associated with the marketing notion, and provides consistent conceptual means for observation and self-reflection.131


Marketing Research Marketing System Marketing Theory Functional Subsystem Chief Marketing Officer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaker, David A. (1995), “Building Strong Brands,” Brandweek, 36 (Oct), 28–34.Google Scholar
  2. Aaker, David A. and Joachimsthaler, Erich (2000), Brand Leadership, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aaker, Jennifer (1997), “Dimensions of brand personality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–357.Google Scholar
  4. Aaker, Jennifer, Fournier, Susan and Brasel, S. Adam (2004), “When Good Brands Do Bad,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  5. Achbar, Mark, Abbott, Jennifer and Bakan, Joel (2003), Canada.
  6. Achrol, Ravi S. and Kotier, Philip (1999), “Marketing in the Network Economy,” Journal of Marketing, 63 ((special issue)), 146–163.Google Scholar
  7. Adler, Lee (1967), “Systems Approach to Marketing,” Harvard Business Review, 45 (May–June), 104–111.Google Scholar
  8. Alderson, Wroe (1957), Marketing behavior and executive action — a functionalist approach to marketing theory, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  9. -(1965), Dynamic marketing behavior — a functionalist theory of marketing, Homewood, Ill.,: R.D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  10. Alderson, Wroe and Cox, Reavis (1948), “Towards a Theory of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, XIII(2), 137–152.Google Scholar
  11. Algesheimer, René, Dholakia, Uptal M. and Herrmann, Andreas (2005), “The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs,” Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19–34.Google Scholar
  12. American Marketing Association (2004), “Definition Marketing,”, [04/02/2004].
  13. Ammann, René (2005), Ammanns wunderbare Welt in Zahlen, Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
  14. Andreasen, Alan R. (2000), “Intersector Transfer of Marketing Knowledge,” in Handbook of Marketing and Society, eds. Paul N. Bloom and Gregory T. Gundlach, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Arndt, Johan (1980), “Perspectives for a theory of marketing,” Journal of Business Research, 8(3), 389–402.Google Scholar
  16. -(1982), “The Conceptual Domain of Marketing: Evaluation of Shelby Hunt’s Three Dichotomies Model,” European Journal of Marketing, 16(1), 27–36.Google Scholar
  17. Arnould, Eric J. and Thompson, Craig J. (2005), “Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 868–883.Google Scholar
  18. Arnould, Eric J. and Wallendorf, Melanie (1994), “Market-oriented ethnography: Interpretation and marketing strategy formulation.,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4), 484–505.Google Scholar
  19. Atkin, Douglas (2004), The Cutting of Brands: When customers Become True Believers, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Backhaus, Klaus (2000), Deutschsprachige Marketingforschung — Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven, Stuttgart: Schäfer Poeschi.Google Scholar
  21. Baecker, Dirk (1999), Organisation als System, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. -(2001), “Why Systems?,” Theory, Culture & Society, 18(1), 59–74.Google Scholar
  23. Bagozzi, Richard P. (1974), “Marketing as an Organized Behavioral System of Exchange,” Journal of Marketing, 38 (October), 77–81.Google Scholar
  24. -(1975), “Marketing as exchange,” Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 32–41.Google Scholar
  25. -(1979), “Toward a Formal Theory of Marketing Exchanges,” in Conceptual and Theoretical Developments in Marketing, eds. O. C. Ferrell, Stephen Brown and Charles Lamb, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 431–447.Google Scholar
  26. Bartels, Robert (1974), “The Identity Crisis in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 38(4), 73–76.Google Scholar
  27. -(1988), The history of marketing thought, Columbus, OH: Publishing Horizons.Google Scholar
  28. Bartels, Robert D. W. (1944), “Marketing Principles,” Journal of Marketing, 9(2), 151–158.Google Scholar
  29. -(1946), “Marketing Theory — Its essential nature,” in Christmas Meeting of the American Marketing Association, Pittsburgh: Academic Division of the American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  30. -(1951), “Can Marketing be a Science?,” Journal of Marketing, 15(3), 319–329.Google Scholar
  31. -(1968), “The General Theory of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 32 (January), 29–33.Google Scholar
  32. -(1970), Marketing Theory and Metatheory, Homewood, Ill.: Irwin-Dorsey.Google Scholar
  33. Bateson, Gregory (1967), “Cybernetic explanation,” American Behaviorist, 10(8), 29–32.Google Scholar
  34. -(1981), Ökologie des Geistes, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  35. Baudrillard, Jean (1968), Le Système des Objets, Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  36. -(1972), Pour une critique de léconomie politique du signe, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  37. -(1981), Simulacra and Simulation, Paris, France: Edition Galilée.Google Scholar
  38. -(1988), “The System of Objects,” in Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings, ed. Mark Poster, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 10–29.Google Scholar
  39. -([1968] 1991), Das System der Dinge — über unser Verhältnis zu den alltäglichen Gegenständen, Frankfurt/Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  40. Baumol, William J. (1957), “On the Role of Marketing Theory,” Journal of Marketing, 21(4), 413–418.Google Scholar
  41. Beckman, Theodore N., Davidson, William R. and Maynard, Harold H (1967), Marketing, New York: Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
  42. Belk, Russell W. (1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.Google Scholar
  43. Belk, Russell W. and Coon, Gregory S. (1993), “Gift Giving as Agapic Love — An Alternative to the Exchange Paradim Based on Dating Experiences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (Dez 1993), 393–417.Google Scholar
  44. Belk, Russell W., Ger, Guliz and Askegaard, Soren (2003), “The Fire of Desire: A Multisited Inquiry into Consumer Passion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 326–352.Google Scholar
  45. Belz, Christian (2003), “Brands geben Orientierung,” Handelszeitung, 24 30.Google Scholar
  46. -(2005), “Komplexitätsmanagement durch professionelle Markenführung,” Thexis, 1 (2005), 2–8.Google Scholar
  47. Berelson, Bernard (1954), “Content Analysis,” in Handbook of Social Psychology — Theory and Method, ed. G. Lindzey, Cambridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  48. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  49. Berman, Shawn L. and Wicks, Andrew C. (1999), “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.Google Scholar
  50. Blair, Margaret M. (1998), “For Whom Should Corporations Be Run? — An Economic Rationale for Stakeholder Management,” Long Range Planning, 31(2), 195–201.Google Scholar
  51. Bolz, Norbert (2002), Das konsumistische Manifest, München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
  52. Borden, Neil H. (1965), “The concept of the marketing mix,” in Science in marketing, ed. G. Schaertz, Chichester: Wiley, 386–397.Google Scholar
  53. Bourdieu, Pierre (1983), “Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital,” in Soziale Ungleichheiten (Sociale Welt, Sonderheft 2), ed. Reinhard Kreckel, Goettingen: Schartz, 183–198.Google Scholar
  54. Brown, Stephen (1993), “Postmodern marketing?,” European Journal of Marketing, 27(4), 19–34.Google Scholar
  55. -(1995a), Postmodern Marketing, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. -(1995b), “Postmodern marketing research — No representation without taxation,” Journal of the Market Research Society, 37(3), 287–311.Google Scholar
  57. -(1996), “Art or Science? Fifty Years of Marketing Debate,” Journal of Marketing Management, 12 (1996), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. -(2001), Marketing — The Retro Revolution, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. -(2003), Free Gift Inside!!, Chichester: Capstone.Google Scholar
  60. Bruhn, Manfred (2003), Kommunikationspolitik, 2nd Ed., München: Franz Vahlen.Google Scholar
  61. Bubik, Roland (1996), Geschichte der Marketing-Theorie — Historische Einführung in die Marketing-Lehre, Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  62. Burawoy, Michael (1998), “The Extened Case Method,” Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–34.Google Scholar
  63. BusinessWeek (2004), The Global Brand Scoreboard: The 100 Top Brands, August, BusinessWeek.Google Scholar
  64. Butler, Ralph Starr (1917), Marketing Methods, New York: Alexander Hamilton Institute.Google Scholar
  65. Carver, T. N. (1917), “Standardization in Marketing,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 31(2), 341–345.Google Scholar
  66. Chalmers, Alan F. (1999), What is This Thing Called Science?, St. Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  67. Cherington, Paul Terry (1921), The elements of marketing, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Cherrier, Hélène and Murray, Jeff B. (2004), “The Sociology of Consumption — The Hidden Facet of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing Management, 20(5/6), 509–526.Google Scholar
  69. Clark, Fred Emerson (1924), Principles of marketing, New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
  70. Converse, Paul D. (1945), “The development of the science of marketing — an exploratory survey,” Journal of Marketing, 10(1), 14–24.Google Scholar
  71. -(1959), Fifty Years of Marketing in Retrospect, Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  72. Coulter, Robin A., Zaltman, Gerald and Coulter, Keith S. (2001), “Interpreting Consumer Perceptions of Advertising: An Application of the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique,” Journal of Advertising, XXX(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
  73. Cox, Reavis and Alderson, Wroe (1950), Theory in Marketing, Chicago: Irwin.Google Scholar
  74. Darwin, Charles Robert (1859), The origin of species — by means of natural selection, or the preservations of favoured races in the struggle for life, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  75. Day, George (1992), “Marketing’s Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(Fall), 323–330.Google Scholar
  76. -(1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organization,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (October), 37–52.Google Scholar
  77. de Chernatony, Leslie (1997a), “Integrated brand building using brand taxonomies,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(1), 56–63.Google Scholar
  78. -(1997b), “Modelling the components of the brand,” European Journal of Marketing, 32(11/12), 1074–1090.Google Scholar
  79. de Chernatony, Leslie and Dall’Olmo Reilly, Francesca (1998), “Defining A “Brand”: Beyond The Literature With Experts’ Interpretations,” Journal of Marketing Management, 14 417–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Dixon, D. F. and Wilkinson, I. F. (1989), “An Alternative Paradigm of Marketing Theory,” European Journal of Marketing, 23(8), 59–69.Google Scholar
  81. Dixon, Donald F. (2002), “Emerging macromarketing concepts — from Socrates to Alfred Marshall,” Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 737–745.Google Scholar
  82. Dubs, Rolf, Euler, Dieter, Rüegg-Stürm, J. and Wyss, Christina E. (2004), Einführung in die Managementlehre, Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  83. Dubs, Rolf, Euler, Dieter and Rüegg-Stürm, Johannes (2002), Einfährung in die Managementlehre (Pilotversion), Bern: Paul Haupt.Google Scholar
  84. Durkheim, Emile ([1893] 1933), The Division of Labor in Society, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  85. Dyllick, Thomas (1984) In: Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Theorie der Gestaltung, Lenkung und Entwicklung zweckorientierter sozialer Systeme, (eds, Hans Ulrich, Fredmund Malik, Gilbert J. B. Probst, Markus Semmel, Thomas Dyllick, Peter Dachler and Emil Walter-Busch) Hochschule St. Gallen, St. Gallen, pp. 162–225.Google Scholar
  86. Elliott, Richard and Wattanasuwan, Kritsadarat (1998), “Brand as symbolic resources for the construction of identity,” Internationaljournal of Advertising, 17(2), 131–145.Google Scholar
  87. Emory, C. William and Cooper, Donald R. (1991), Business research methods, 4 Ed., Homewood, Ill.: Irwin.Google Scholar
  88. Epp, Amber and Price, Linda L. (2005), “Reflecting Family: Home Furnishing as Consumption Symbols of Family Identity,” in European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, eds. Karin M. Ekström and Helene Brembeck, Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  89. Eppler, Martin J. and Will, Markus (2001), “Branding Knowledge — brand building beyond product and service brands,” Journal of Brand Management, 8(6), 445–457.Google Scholar
  90. Erickson, Bonnie H. (1996), “Culture, Class, and Connections,” American Journal of Sociolgy, 102(1), 217–252.Google Scholar
  91. Ferrell, O. C. and Lucas, George H. (1987), “An evaluation of the progress in the development of a definition of marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(3), 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Firat, Fuat A., Dholakia, Nikhilesh and Venkatesh, Alladi (1995), “Marketing in a postmodern world,” European Journal of Marketing, 29(1), 40–56.Google Scholar
  93. Firat, Fuat A. and Venkatesh, Alladi (1995), “Liberatory Postmoderism and the Reenchantment of Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 239–267.Google Scholar
  94. Fisk, George (1967), Marketing Systems: An Introductory Analysis, New York et al: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  95. Fisk, George and Clark, Terry (1999), “Reflection and Retrospection: Searching for Visions in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 115–122.Google Scholar
  96. Förster, A. and Kreuz, P. (2003), Marketing Trends — Ideen und Konzepte für Ihren Markterfolg, Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  97. Fournier, Susan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.Google Scholar
  98. Foxall, Gordon (1984), “Marketing Domain,” European Journal of Marketing, 18(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
  99. Fuchs, Stephan (2001), Against essentialism — A theory of culture and society, Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Fullerton, Ronald A. (1988), “How Modern is Marketing? Marketing’s Evolution and the Myth of the ‘Production Era’,” Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 108–136.Google Scholar
  101. Giddens, Anthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  102. Giesler, Markus (2003), “Social Systems in Marketing,” in European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 6, eds. Darach Turley and Stephen W. Brown, Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research, Pages 249–256.Google Scholar
  103. -(2004), “Consuming Cyborgs — Steps to an ecology of posthuman consumer culture,” University of Witten/Herdecke, Department of Business Administration, Witten/Herdecke.Google Scholar
  104. -(in revision), “Marketplace Drama: Discourses of Power and the Performance of Consumer Resistance,” Journal of Consumer Research, (in revision).Google Scholar
  105. Giesler, Markus and Pohlmann, Mali (2003a), “The Anthropology of File Sharing — Consuming Napster as as Gift,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 30, eds. Punam Anand Keller and Dennis W. Rook, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 273–280.Google Scholar
  106. -(2003b), “The Social Form of Napster — Cultivating the Paradox of Consumer Emancipation,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 30, eds. Punam Anand Keller and Dennis W. Rook, Provo, UT: Advances in Consumer Research, 94–101.Google Scholar
  107. Giesler, Markus and Venkatesh, Alladi (2004), “Consuming Cyborgs — Researching Posthuman Consumer Culture,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 31, eds. Barbara Kahn and Mary Frances Luce, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  108. -(2005), “Refraining the Embodied Consumer as Cyborg — A Posthumanist Epistemology of Consumption,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 32, eds. Geeta Menon and R. Rao Akshay, Portland, OR: Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  109. Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory — Strategies for Qualitative Research, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  110. Glasersfeld, Ernst von (1981), “Einführung in den radikalen Konstruktivismus,” in Die erfundene Wirklichkeit — Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben, ed. Paul Watzlawick, München, Zürich: Piper & Co., 16–38.Google Scholar
  111. -(2003), “An Introduction to Radical Constructivism,”, [2004/10/27].
  112. Graham, Peter (1993), “Marketing’s Domain: A Critical Review of the Development of the Marketing Concept,” Marketing Bulletin, 4 1–11.Google Scholar
  113. Grassl, Wolfgang (1999), “The Reality of Brands — Towards an Ontology of Marketing,” American Journal of Economics & Sociology, 58(2), 313.Google Scholar
  114. Grönroos, Christian (1997), “Keynote Paper: From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing — Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing,” Management Decision, 35(4), 322–339.Google Scholar
  115. Gutenberg, Erich (1951), Grundlagen der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  116. -(1958), Einführung in die Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  117. -(1984), Grundlagen der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, 17. Ed., Berlin et al: Springer.Google Scholar
  118. Habermas, Jürgen (1984a), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  119. -(1984b), The Theory of Communicative Action, Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  120. Habermas, Jürgen and Luhmann, Niklas (1971), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozial-technologie — Was leistet die Systemforschung?, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  121. Haibert, Michael (1965), The Meaning and Souces of Marketing Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  122. Han, Jiawei and Kamber, Micheline (2000), Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems, Jim Gray (ed.), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
  123. Handelman, Jay M. (1999), “Culture Jamming: Expanding the Application of the Critical Research Project,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 26, eds. Eric J. Arnould and Linda L. Price, Provo, UT: Association of Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  124. Heinze, Thomas (2001), Qualitative Sozialforschung — Einführung, Methodologie und Forschungspraxis, Wien: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  125. Hellmann, Kai-Uwe (2003), Soziologie der Marke, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  126. Henderson, Steven (1998), “No such thing as market orientation — A call for no more papers,” Management Decision, 36(9), 598–609.Google Scholar
  127. Hirschmann, Elisabeth C. (1986), “Humanistic inquiry in Marketing Research — Philosophy, Method, and Criteria,” Journal of Marketing, XXIII (August 1986), 237–286.Google Scholar
  128. Holloway, Robert J. and Hancock, Robert S. (1968), Marketing in a changing environment, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  129. Holt, Douglas B. (2002), “Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (June 2002), 70–90.Google Scholar
  130. -(2003), “What Becomes an Icon Most?,” Harvard Business Review, 81(3), 43–50.Google Scholar
  131. -(2004), How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  132. Holt, Douglas B. and Thompson, Craig J. (2004), “Man-of-Action Heroes: The Pursuit of Heroic Masculinity in Everyday Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 425–440.Google Scholar
  133. Hotchkiss, George Burton (1938), Milestones of Marketing. A brief history of the evolution of market, New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
  134. Howard, Donald G., Savins, David M., Howell, William and Ryans, John K. (1991), “The Evolution of Marketing Theory in the United States and Europe,” European Journal of Marketing, 25(2), 7–16.Google Scholar
  135. Howard, John A. (1965), Marketing Theory, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  136. Hunt, Shelby D. (1971), “The Morphology of Theory and the General Theory of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 35(2), 65–68.Google Scholar
  137. -(1973), “Lawlike Generalizations and Marketing Theory,” Journal of Marketing, 37(3), 69–70.Google Scholar
  138. -(1976a), Marketing theory — conceptual foundations of research in marketing, Columbus, OH: Grid.Google Scholar
  139. -(1976b), “The nature and scope of marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 40(3), 17–28.Google Scholar
  140. -(1983), “General Theories and the Fundamental Explanda of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 47 (Fall 1983), 9–17.Google Scholar
  141. -(1991), Modern marketing theory — critical issues in the philosophy of marketing, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.Google Scholar
  142. -(2000), A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  143. -(2002), Foundations of marketing theory: toward a general theory of marketing, Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  144. -(2003), Controversy in marketing theory — for reason, realism, truth, and objectivity, Armonk, N.Y., London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  145. Hunt, Shelby D. and Morgan, Robert M. (1995), “The comparative advantage theory of competition,” Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  146. Hutchinson, Kenneth D. (1952), “Marketing as a science — an appraisal,” Journal of Marketing, 16(3), 286–294.Google Scholar
  147. Jacoby, Neil H. (1973), Corporate power and social responsibility — a blueprint for the future, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  148. Kapferer, Jean-Noel (1992), Strategic Brand Management, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  149. Kassarjian, Harold H. (1977), “Content Analysis in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8–19.Google Scholar
  150. Kates, Steven M. (2001), “Camp as Cultural Capital: Further Elaboration of a Consumption Taste,” Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 334–340.Google Scholar
  151. -(2004), “The Dynamics of Brand Legitimacy: An Interpretive Study in the Gay Men’s Community,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 455–465.Google Scholar
  152. Katsikeas, Constantine S. (2003), “Advances in international marketing theory and practice,” International Business Review, 12(2), 135–140.Google Scholar
  153. Keith, Robert J. (1960), “The Marketing Revolution,” Journal of Marketing, 24(3), 35–39.Google Scholar
  154. Kelley, Eugene and Lazer, William (1958), Managerial Marketing: Perspectives and Viewpoints, Homewood, Ill.: Irwin.Google Scholar
  155. Keynes, John Maynard (1973), “The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money,” The Royal Economic Society, Collected Writings Vol. VII, London 334–351.Google Scholar
  156. King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sidney (1994), Designing social inquiry — Scientific inference in qualitative research, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  157. Klein, Naomi (1999), No Logo — Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies, New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  158. Kleinaltenkamp, Michael and Jacob, Frank (2002), “German approaches to business-to-business marketing theory — Origins and structures,” Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 149–155.Google Scholar
  159. Kotier, Philip (1967), Marketing Management — Analysis, Planning, and Control, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  160. -(1972), “A Generic Concept of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 36 (Apr72), 46–54.Google Scholar
  161. -(1997), Marketing Management, 9. Ed., Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  162. -(2003a), Marketing Insights from A to Z — 80 concepts every manager needs to know, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  163. -(2003b), Marketing Management, 11. Ed., Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  164. Kotier, Philip, Armstrong, Gary, Saunders, John and Wong, Veronica (1999), Principles of Marketing, 2nd European Ed., London: Prentice Hall Europe.Google Scholar
  165. Kotier, Philip and Bliemel, Friedhelm (2001), Marketing Management — Analyse, Planung und Verwirklichung, 10th Ed., Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  166. Kotler, Philip and Levy, Sidney J. (1969a), “Broadening the Concept of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 33 (Jan), 10–15.Google Scholar
  167. -(1969b), “A New Form of Marketing Myopia: Rejoinder to Professor Luck,” Journal of Marketing, 33(3), 55–57.Google Scholar
  168. Kotier, Philip and Zaltman, Gerald (1971), “Social Marketing: An Approach to Planned Social Change,” Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 3–12.Google Scholar
  169. Kozinets, Robert V. (1998), “On Netnography: Initial Reflections on Consumer Research Investigations of Cyberculture,” Advances in Consumer Research, 25 366–371.Google Scholar
  170. -(2002), “Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
  171. Kozinets, Robert V. and Handelman, Jay M. (2004), “Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (Dec), 691–704.Google Scholar
  172. Kubicek, H. (1977), “Heuristische Bezugsrahmen und heuristisch angelegte Forschungsdesigns als Elemente einer Konstruktionsstrategie empirischer Forschung,” in Empirische und handlungstheoretische Forschungskonzeptionen im der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, ed. R. Köhler,(Hrsg.) Stuttgart: Verlag C. E. Poeschel, S. 3–36.Google Scholar
  173. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1996 [1962]), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd Ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  174. Lasn, Kalle (2000), Culture Jam: The Uncooling of America TM, New York: Quill.Google Scholar
  175. Lazer, William (1969), “Marketing’s changing social relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 3–9.Google Scholar
  176. Lee, Daniel (2000), “The Society of Society — The Grand Finale of Niklas Luhmann,” Sociological Theory, 18(2), 321–330.Google Scholar
  177. Leitch, Shirley and Richardson, Neil (2003), “Corporate branding in the new economy,” European Journal of Marketing, 37(7/8), 1065–1079.Google Scholar
  178. Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Jacobson, Claire and Schoepf, Brooke Grundfest (1968), Structural anthropology, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  179. Levitt, Theodore (1960), “Marketing Myopia,” Harvard Business Review, 38(4), 45–57.Google Scholar
  180. Lilien, Gary L., Rangaswamy, Arvind, van Bruggen, Gerrit H. and Wiergenga, Berend (2002), “Bridging the Marketing Theory-Practice Gap with Marketing Engineering,” Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 111–121.Google Scholar
  181. Locke, Karen and Golden-Biddle, Karen (1997), “Constructing opportunities for contribution — Structuring intertextual coherence and…” Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023–1063.Google Scholar
  182. Luck, David J. (1969), “Broadening the Concept of Marketing-Too Far,” Journal of Marketing, 33 (July), 53–63.Google Scholar
  183. Lüdicke, Marius K. (2004), “Advances in Marketing Theory: An Extended Case Analysis of Marketing as a Social System,” working paper, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen.Google Scholar
  184. -(2005), “Brand Systems: A Conceptual Framework for the Sociological Analysis of Brand Phenomena,” in European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, eds. Karin M. Ekström and Helene Brembeck, Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  185. -(forthcoming), “Brand Community under Fire: The Role of Social Environments for the HUMMER brand community,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  186. Lüdicke, Marius K. and Giesler, Markus (2005), “Negotiating Distinctions: How Brands Become Cultural Resources,” in European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, eds. Karin M. Ekström and Helene Brembeck, Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  187. Luhmann, Niklas (1984), Soziale Systeme — Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  188. -(1988), Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  189. -(1990), Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  190. -(1995), Social systems, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  191. -(1996), Die Kunst der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  192. -(1998), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  193. -(2000a), Art as a Social System, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  194. -(2000b), Die Politik der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  195. -(2000c), The reality of Mass Media, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  196. -(2002), Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft, Dieter Lenzen (ed.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  197. Marketing Staff of the Ohio State University (1965), “A Statement of Marketing Philosophy,” Journal of Marketing, 29(1), 43–44.Google Scholar
  198. Martin, Charles L. (1985), “Delineating the Boundaries of Marketing,” European Journal of Marketing, 19(4), 5–13.Google Scholar
  199. Martin, Luther H. (1988), “Truth, Power, Self — An Interview with Michel Foucault — October 25th, 1982,” in Technologies of the Self-A Seminar with Michael Foucault, ed. L. H. Martin, London: Tavistock, 9–15.Google Scholar
  200. Marx, Karl (1885), Das Kapital — Kritik der politischen Oekonomie, Friedrich Engels (ed.), Hamburg: Meissner.Google Scholar
  201. -([1867] 1946), Capital, New York, NY: Everyman’s Library.Google Scholar
  202. Maslow, Abraham H. (1943), “A Theory of Human Motivation,” Psychological Review, 50 370–396.Google Scholar
  203. Maturana, Humberto R. ([1974] 1999), “The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(2), 149–168.Google Scholar
  204. Maturana, Humberto R. and Varela, Francisco J. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge: A New Look at the Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  205. -([1970] 1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  206. Mayring, Philipp ([1983] 2003), Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse — Grundlagen und Techniken, 8 Ed., Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.Google Scholar
  207. McAlexander, James H., Schouten, John W. and Koenig, Harold F. (2002), “Building Brand Community,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (Jan), 38–54.Google Scholar
  208. McCarthy, E. Jerome (1964), Basic Marketing. A Managerial Approach, 2nd Ed., Homewood, Ill.Google Scholar
  209. McCracken, Grant (1986), “Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
  210. -(1988), The Long Interview, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  211. McKenna, Regis (1991), “Marketing is Everything,” Harvard Business Review, 69 (January/February), 65–79.Google Scholar
  212. Meffert, Heribert (1994), Marketing — Management — Analyse-Strategie-Implementierung, Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  213. -(2000a), Marketing — Grundlagen marktorientierter Unternehmensführung, 9. Ed., Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  214. -(2000b), “Marketingdisziplin im Spannungsfeld zwischen wissenschaftlichem Anspruch und praxisbezogenen Anforderungen,” in Deutschsprachige Marketingforschung — Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven, ed. Klaus Backhaus, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, 327–360.Google Scholar
  215. Mohr, Jakki J., Fisher, Robert J. and Nevin, John R. (1996), “Collaborative Communication in Inferfirm Relationships — Moderating Effects of Integration and Control,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (July), 103–115.Google Scholar
  216. Mohr, Jakki J. and Nevin, John R. (1990), “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels — A Theoretical Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 36–52.Google Scholar
  217. Moisio, Risto, Arnould, Eric J. and Price, Linda L. (2004), “Between Mothers and Markets: Constructing Family Identity through Homemade Food,” Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(3), 361–384.Google Scholar
  218. Moorman, Christine and Rust, Roland T. (1999), “The Role of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 180–198.Google Scholar
  219. Morgan, Robert E. (1996), “Conceptual foundations of Marketing and Marketing Theory,” Management Decision, 34(10), 19–26.Google Scholar
  220. Moriarty, Rowland T. and Moran, Ursula (1990), “Managing Hybrid Marketing Systems,” Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 146–155.Google Scholar
  221. Moyer, Mel S. (1967), Changing Marketing Systems, Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  222. Muñiz, Albert M. Jr. and O’Guinn, Thomas (2001), “Brand Community,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (March), 412–432.Google Scholar
  223. Muñiz, Albert M. Jr. and Schau, Hope Jensen (2005), “Religiosity in the Abandoned Apple Newton Brand Community,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 737–748.Google Scholar
  224. Murray, Lawrence (1976), “Corporate Communications — Management’s Newest Marketing Skill,” Public Relations Quarterly, 21(1), 18–29.Google Scholar
  225. Nickels, William G. (1974), “Conceptual Conflicts in Marketing,” Journal of Economics and Business, 27 (Winter), 140–143.Google Scholar
  226. Nieschlag, Robert, Dichtl, Erwin and Hörschgen, Hans (2002), Marketing, 19. Ed., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  227. Nieschlag, Robert and Hörschgen, Hans (1969), Einführung in die Lehre von der Absatzwirtschaft — ein entscheidungstheoretischer Ansatz, 1st Ed., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  228. Opp, Karl-Dieter (2002), Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften — Einführung in Probleme ihrer Theoriebildung und praktischen Anwendung, 5. Ed., Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  229. Ozanne, Julie L. and Murray, Jeff B. (1995), “Uniting Critical Theory and Public Policy to Create the Reflexively Defiant Consumer,” American Behavioral Scientist, 38(4), 516–526.Google Scholar
  230. Palmer, Adrian and Ponsonby, Sharon (2002), “The Social Construction of New Marketing Paradigms — The Influence of Personal Perspective,” Journal of Marketing Management, 18(1/2), 173–193.Google Scholar
  231. Parsons, Talcott (1951), The social system, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  232. -(1971), The system of modern societies, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  233. Parsons, Talcott and Toby, Jackson (1977), The evolution of societies, Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  234. Patrick, Aaron O. (2005), “Commercials by Cellphone,” The Wallstreet Journal Europe, 08.22.2005, A5.Google Scholar
  235. Paul, Michael (2004), “Es war einmal, die Marke…: Entstehungsgeschichte, Beispiele und Bedeutung historischer Markenartikel,” Absatzwirtschaft, Oct. 22, 2004.Google Scholar
  236. Peppers, Don and Rodgers, Martha (1995), “A New Marketing Paradigm: Share of Customer Not Market Share,” Planning Review, 23(2), 14–19.Google Scholar
  237. Peter, Paul J. (1992), “Realism or Relativism for Marketing Theory and Research: A Comment on Hunt’s “Scientific Realism”,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (Apr 92), 72–79.Google Scholar
  238. Popper, Karl (1959), The logic of scientific discovery, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  239. Porter, Michael (1986), Wettbewerbsvorteile — Spitzenleistungen erreichen und behaupten, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  240. Porter, Michael E. (1998), Competitive advantage — creating and sustaining superior performance, New York, London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  241. Powell, Fred Wilbur (1910), “Co-operative Marketing of California Fresh Fruit,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 24(2), 392–419.Google Scholar
  242. Randall, James E. and Miles, Morgan P. (1992), “A New Weltanschauung: An Integration of Marketing Theory and Practice,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice; Fall (1992), 1–8.Google Scholar
  243. Reckwitz, Andreasen, Alan R. (2004), “Die Logik der Grenzerhaltung und die Logik der Grenzüberschreitungen: Niklas Luhmann und die Kulturtheorien,” in Niklas Luhmann und die Kulturtheorie, ed. Günter Burkart, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  244. Riezebos, Rik, Kist, Bas and Kootstra, Gert (2003), Brand Management — A theoretical and practical approach, Harlow et al.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  245. Rossiter, J. P. (1996), IMC-Theory and Implementation, Rotterdam: Rotterdam School of Management.Google Scholar
  246. Roth, Stefan and Gmür, Markus (2004), “Struktur und Entwicklungslinien der Marketingforschung: Ergebnisse einer Zitations-und Kozitationsanalyse nordamerikanischer Marketing-Journals 1987–2001,” working paper, Bayreuth.Google Scholar
  247. Rudolph, Thomas and Schweizer, Markus (2005), “Confusion goes Discount,” io new management, No. 6, St. Gallen, 38–41.Google Scholar
  248. Rüegg-Stürm, J. (2005), The New St. Gallen Management Model: Basic Categories of an Approach to Integrated Management, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  249. Rüegg-Stürm, Johannes (2002), Das neue St. Galler Management-Modell — Grundkategorien einer integrierten Managementlehre — der HSG-Ansatz, Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  250. Ryans, John K. and Spijker, Willem Van’t (1974), “Current Status of Marketing Theory — A European-American Comparison,” European Journal of Marketing, 8(3), 193–201.Google Scholar
  251. Schierenbeck, Henning (2000), Grundzüge der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, München, Oldenburg: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  252. Schmid, Beat F. (1997), The Concept of Media, Workshop on Electronic Markets, R. W. H. Bons (ed.), Maastricht.Google Scholar
  253. -(2001), “What is New About the Digital Economy?,” Electronic Markets, 11(1), 44–51.Google Scholar
  254. Schneider, Dieter (1983), “Marketing als Wirtschaftswissenschaft oder Geburt einer Marketingwissenschaft aus dem Geiste des Unternehmensversagens,” Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 35. Jg (1983), 197–223.Google Scholar
  255. Schouten, John W. and McAlexander, James H. (1995), “Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 43–62.Google Scholar
  256. Schwartz, George (1963), Development of Marketing Theory, Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar
  257. Shannon, Claude E. (1948), “A mathematical theory of communication,” The Belli System Technical journal, 27 (July–October), 379–423, 623–656.Google Scholar
  258. Shaw, A. W. (1912), “Some problems in market distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 26(4), 704–765.Google Scholar
  259. Sherry, John F. (1983), “Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 157–169.Google Scholar
  260. Sheth, Jagdish N. and Parvatiyar, Atul (2000), “Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets: Antecedents and Consequences,” in Handbook of Relationship Marketing, eds. N. Sheth Jagdish and Atul Parvatiyar, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  261. Spencer-Brown, George ([1969] 1999), Laws of Form — Gesetze der Form, 2nd Ed., Lübeck: Bohlmeier.Google Scholar
  262. Stichweh, Rudolf (2000), “Systems Theory as an Alternative to Action Theory? The Rise of ‘Communication’ as a Theoretical Option,” Acta Sociologica (Taylor & Francis Ltd), 43(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
  263. Stidsen, Bent and Schutte, Thomas F. (1972), “Marketing as a Communication System: The Marketing Concept Revisited,” Journal of Marketing, 36(4), 22–28.Google Scholar
  264. Strauss, Anselm L. and Corbin, Juliet M. (1998), Basics of qualitative research — Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, 2nd Ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  265. Thompson, Craig J. (1997), “Interpreting Consumers: A Hermeneutical Framework for Deriving Marketing Insights from the Texts of Consumers’ Consumption Stories,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34(4), 438–456.Google Scholar
  266. -(2004), “Marketplace Mythology and Discourses of Power,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (June), 162–180.Google Scholar
  267. Tomczak, Torsten and Brexendorf, Tim O. (2005), “Strategische Markenführung,” in Markenaufbau und Markenpflege. Grundlagen und Praxis zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung, eds. Torsten Tomczak and Tim O. Brexendorf, Zurich: Bilanz, 9–81.Twitchell, James B. (2004), “An English Teacher Looks at Branding,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 484–490.Google Scholar
  268. Tybout, Alice M. and Carpenter, Gregory S. (2001), “Creating and Managing Brands,” in Kellogg on Marketing, ed. Dawn Iacobucci, New York: Wiley, 74–102.Google Scholar
  269. Ulrich, Hans (1971), Der systemorientierte Ansatz in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  270. Vaile, Ronald S. (1949), “Towards a Theory of Marketing — A Comment,” Journal of Marketing, 14(4), 520–522.Google Scholar
  271. Varela, Francisco J. (1979), Principles of Biological Autonomy, New York: Elsevier/North-Holland.Google Scholar
  272. Vargo, Stephen L., Lusch, R. F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (Jan 2004), 1–17.Google Scholar
  273. Varian, Hal R. (1980), “A Model of Sales,” The American Economic Review, 70(4), 651–659.Google Scholar
  274. Verhoef, Peter C. (2003), “Understanding the Effect of Customer Relationship Management Efforts on Customer Retention and Customer Share Development,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (Oct), 30–45.Google Scholar
  275. von Foerster, Heinz (1979), “Cybernetics of cybernetics,” in Communication and Control in Society, ed. K. Krippendorff, New York: Gordon and Breach, 5–8.Google Scholar
  276. -(1981), “Das Konstruieren der Wirklichkeit,” in Die erfundene Wirklichkeit — Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben, ed. Paul Watzlawick, München, Zürich: Piper & Co., 39–60.Google Scholar
  277. Watzlawick, Paul (1981a), Die erfundene Wirklichkeit — Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? — Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus, München, Zürich: Piper & Co.Google Scholar
  278. -(1981b), “Selbsterfüllene Prophezeiungen,” in Die erfundene Wirklichkeit — Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben, ed. Paul Watzlawick, München, Zürich: Piper & Co., 91–110.Google Scholar
  279. Weber, Max and Rheinstein, Max (1966), Max Weber on law in economy and society, Max Weber, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft ed. and trans, by Edward Shils and Max Rheinstein, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  280. Wiener, Norbert ([1948] 1961), Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 2 Ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  281. Wilkinson, Ian and Young, Louise (2002), “Marketing theory in the next millenium — Looking backwards and forwards,” Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 81–85.Google Scholar
  282. Will, Markus (2000), “Why Communications Management?,” International Journal of Media Management, 2(1), 46–53.Google Scholar
  283. -(2001), “Kommunikationsmanagement und Unternehmenskommunikation in Theorie und Praxis — Strategische Konzepte und operative Anleitungen,” St. Gallen.Google Scholar
  284. Willke, Helmut (2000), Systemtheorie — 1. Grundlagen: eine Einführung in die Grundprobleme der Theorie sozialer Systeme, 6. Ed., Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
  285. Workman, John P., Homburg, Christian and Grüner, Kjell (1998), “Marketing Organization: An Integrative Framework of Dimensions and Determinants,” Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 21–41.Google Scholar
  286. Yin, Robert K. (2003), Case study research — design and methods, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
  287. Zimmermann, Rainer, Klein-Bölting, Udo, Sander, Björn and Murad-Aga, Tharek (2001), Brand 1: Brand Equity Excellence, BBDO Consulting Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2006

Personalised recommendations