Skip to main content

Rebuilding Strategic Capacity? Multi-Level Governance, Leadership and Public Service Agreements in Britain

  • Chapter
Public Governance and Leadership

Abstract

The spread of new-public management inspired initiatives across advanced liberal democracies in the 1980s and 1990s were driven by a desire to increase the economic efficiency of state systems - to get ‘more bang for each buck’ to use Osborne and Gaebler’s well known phrase (Osborne/ Gaebler 1992). The disaggregation or deconstruction of large multi-purpose bureaucratic structures into quasi-autonomous single purpose bodies combined with where possible the introduction of market principles would, so the theory suggested, lead to greater specialisation, customer focus and transparency. As the work of the OECD (OECD 2002) has demonstrated in detail, this farreaching wave of administrative reform led to the rapid ‘unbundling’ (PoUitt/ Talbot 2003) or ‘unravelling’ (Hooghe/ Marks 2003, p. 233–243) of the state with a concomitant growth in what has become known as ‘distributed’ or ‘delegated’ public governance (Flinders 2004a, 2004b; Flinders/ Thiel/ Gréve 1999) - the location of key state responsibilities beyond the direct control of elected politicians and their officials. The creation of a dense and administratively complex tier of delegated governance within the topography of most state systems has created both political and leadership challenges. From the political perspective the key challenge lies in designing and implementing new mechanisms of democratic accountability through which this ‘fugitive power’ (Morison 1998) can be scrutinised and ‘blame games’ between organisational leaders and politicians avoided (Hood 2002; see also Flinders 2004c).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Audit Commission/ Healthcare Commission/ National Audit Office (2006), Tackling Child Obesity-First Steps, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I./ Bristow, G. (2003), Devolution and the Gatekeeping Role of the Core Executive: The Struggle for European Funds, in: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 405–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I./ Flinders, M. (eds.) (2004), Multi-level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, A. (1997), Political Responsibility for UK Prison Security-Ministers Escape Again, in: Public Administration, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2001), Prime Minister’s Speech on Public Service Reform, London, 16. October 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2004), We Should Not Shy Away from Radical Reform, Speech at a Guardian Summit on Public Service Reform, London, 29. January 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V. (ed.) (2005), Joined-Up Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. (1998), The Quest for Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, M./ Holliday, I. (2004), The Blair Government and the Core Executive, in: Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (2000), Citizens First-Modernising Government Annual Report 2000, London: Cabinet Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Cm. 3978 (1998), Stability and Investment for the Long Term-Economic and Fiscal Strategy Report 1998, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Cm. 4011 (1998), Modern Public Services for Britain: Investing in Reform-Comprehensive Spending Review: New Public Spending Plans 1999–2002, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Cm. 4181 (1998), Public Services for the Future: Modernisation, Reform, Accountability. Comprehensive Spending Review: Public Service Agreements 1999–2002, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Cm. 4808 (2000), 2000 Spending Review: Public Service Agreements 2001–4, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Cm. 5571 (2002), Spending Review 2002: Public Service Agreements 2003–06, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Cm. 6238 (2004), Spending Review 2004: Public Service Agreements 2005–08, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1997), The Eclipse of the State: Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization, in: World Politics, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 62–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2001), The Politics of Accountability in the Modern State, London: Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2002), Governance in Whitehall, in: Public Administration, Vol. 80, No. 1, pp. 51–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2004a), Distributed Public Governance in Britain, in: Public Administration, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 883–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2004b), Distributed Public Governance in the European Union, in: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 520–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2004c), Icebergs and MPs: Delegated Governance and Parliament, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 767–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2005), The Politics of Public-Private Partnerships, in: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 543–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M./ Thiel, van S./ Greve, C. (1999), Quangos-What’s in a Name?-Defining Quangos from a Comparative Perspective, in: Governance, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaille, W. B. (1956), Essentially Contested Concepts, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 167–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. (2000), Policy Agenda in a Multi-level Polity, in: Dunleavy P./ Gamble, A./ Holliday, I./ Peele, G. (eds.), Developments in British Politics 6, London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, Sir P. (2004), Releasing Resources to the Front Line-Independent Review of Public Sector Efficiency, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S./ Eggers, W. (2004), Governing by Network, Washington DC: Brookings Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1944), Road to Serfdom, London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, J./ Wright, V. (2000), Governing from the Centre: Policy Coordination in Six European Core Executives, in: Rhodes, R. A. W. (ed.), Transforming British Government: Vol. 2, Changing Roles and Relationships, London: Macmillan, pp. 27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 82 (1998), The Roles and Responsibility of the Minister for the Cabinet Office, Minutes of Evidence-Public Administration Select Committee, Session 1998–9, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 960-II (1998), The New Fiscal Framework and the Comprehensive Spending Review: Minutes of Evidence, Eight Report of the Treasury Select Committee, Session 1997–8, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 209 (1999), Quangos, Sixth Report of the Public Administration Select Committee, Session 1998–1999, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 378 (1999), Public Service Agreements, Seventh Report of the Select Committee on Treasury, Session 1998–9, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 849 (1999), Public Service Agreements: The Government’s Response to the Committee’s Seventh Report of Session 1998–99, Seventh Special Report; London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 73-I (2001), HM Treasury, Third Report of the Treasury Select Committee, Session 2000–1, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 73-II (2001), HM Treasury: Minutes of Evidence, Third Report of the Treasury Select Committee, Session 2000–1, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 367 (2001), Mapping the Quango State, Fifth Report of the Public Administration Select Committee, Session 2000–2001, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 1092-II (2002), Spending Review 2002-Minutes of Evidence for Thursday 18 July 2002, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 62-I (2003), On Target? Government by Measurement, Fifth Report of the Public Administration Select Committee, Session 2002–3, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 62-II (2003), On Target? Government by Measurement: Appendices, Fifth Report of the Public Administration Select Committee, Session 2002–3, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HC 331-I (2005), Performance Targets and Monitoring-Minutes of Oral Evidence given by Rt Hon Paul Boateng MP, Chief Secretary, Mr Gus O’Donnell CB, HM Treasury, 9 February 2005, Minutes of Evidence-Treasury Select Committee, Session 2004–5, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2003), Background Paper: The UK Government’s Public Service Agreement Framework, London: HM Treasury

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury and Cabinet Office (2004), Devolving Decision Making: 1-Delivering Better Public Services: Refining Targets and Performance Management, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, R. (ed.) (2005), Governance and the Public Sector, London: Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, I. (2000), Is the British State Hollowing Out?, in: Political Quarterly, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2002), The Risk Game and the Blame Game, in: Government and Opposition, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2006), Gaming in Targetworld: The Targets Approach to Managing British Public Services, in: Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 515–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L./ Marks, G. (2001), Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, London: Rowman and Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L./ Marks, G. (2003), Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multilevel Governance, in: American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, O. (2003), The Executive Agency Revolution in Whitehall: Public Interest versus Bureau-Shaping Perspectives, London: Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • James, O. (2004), The UK Core Executive’s use of Public Service Agreements as a Tool of Governance, in: Public Administration, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 397–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1998), The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: The Case of Economic Development, in: International Social Science Journal, Vol. 50, No. 155, pp. 40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2004), Multi-level Governance and Multi-level Metagovernance-Changes in the European Union as Integral Moments in the Transformation and Reorientation of Contemporary Statehood, in: Bache, I./ Flinders, M. (eds.), Multi-level Governance, pp. 49–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D./ Richards, D. (2001), Departmentalism and Joined-Up Government: Back to the Future?, in: Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W./ Klijn, E./ Koppenjan, J. (1977), Managing Complex Networks, London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1975), Overload: Problems of Governing in the 1970s, in: Political Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2-3, pp. 284–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. (2004), Governance, Oxford: Polity

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S./ Woodward, D. (2002), Implementing the Third Way: Public Services Under Blair, in: Public Money and Management, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1997), Hidden Agendas-Politics, Law and Disorder, London: Hamish Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, T. (2002), Delivering Joined-Up Government in the UK: Dimensions, Issues and Problems, in: Public Administration, Vol. 80, No. 4, pp. 615–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1986), The Autopoiesis of Social Systems, in: Geyer, F./ Zouwen, J. van der (eds.), Sociocybernetic Paradoxes, London: Sage, pp. 172–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D./ Richards, D./ Smith, M. (2003), Unequal Power: Towards and Asymmetric Power Model of the British Polity, in: Government and Opposition, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 306–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milburn, A. (2003), A Prospectus for Pilot Authorities, Speech to the Social Market Foundation, London, 30. April 2003, London: ODPM

    Google Scholar 

  • Morison, J. (1998), The Case Against Constitutional Reform?, in: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 510–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (2001), Measuring the Performance of Government Departments, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (2005a), Joint Working, London: National Audit Office

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (2005b), Public Service Agreements: Managing Data Quality-Compendium Report, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971), Bureaucracies and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine Atherton

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1982), Bureaucracies and Representative Government, in: Public Administration, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 23–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002), Distributed Public Governance, Paris: OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Osbourne, D./ Gaebler, T. (1992), Re-Inventing Government, London: Plume

    Google Scholar 

  • Performance and Innovation Unit (2000a), Wiring it Up-Whitehall’s Management of Cross-Cutting Policies and Services, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Performance and Innovation Unit (2000b), Reaching Out-The Role of Central Government at Regional and Local Level, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2000), Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J./ Peters, B. G. (2000), Governance, Politics and the State, London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C./ Talbot, C. (eds.) (2003), Unbundling Government, London: Taylor and Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D./ Smith, M. J. (2004), The Hybrid State: Labour’s Response to the Challenge of Governance, in: Smith, M. J./ Ludlam, S. (eds.), Governing as New Labour, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 106–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1994), The Hollowing Out of the State, in: Political Quarterly, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 138–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997), Understanding Governance-Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1976), Ungovernability: Is there Fire behind the Smoke?, in: Political Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. (1995), Governance in the Twenty-First Century, in: Global Governance, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 13–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J./ Czempiel, E. (1992), Governing with Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1970), Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics, in: American Political Science Review, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 1033–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (1994), Games Real Actors Could Play, in: Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 38–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. (2004), What Matters is What Works: The Third Way and the Private Finance Initiative, in: Hale, S./ Leggett, W./ Martell, L. (eds.), The Third Way and Beyond, Manchester: Manchester University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Market Foundation (2005), To the Point: A Blueprint for Good Targets, London: Social Market Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998), Governance as Theory: Five Propositions, in: International Journal of Social Science, Vol. 50, No. 155, pp. 17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1996), The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, P. (2005), Stretching Concepts too Far? Multi-Level Governance, Policy Transfer and the Politics of Scale in South East Europe, in: Southern European Politics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 66–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. (2000), Performing Performance-A Comedy in Five Acts, in: Public Money and Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2000), Hollowing out or Filling in? Task Forces and the Management of Cross-cutting Issues in the British Government, in: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 46–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teenage Pregnancy Unit (2005), Teenage Pregnancy Strategy Evaluation-Final Report, London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  • Thain, C. (2004), Treasury Rules OK? The Further Evolution of a British Institution, in: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (1998), The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era, Cambridge: Polity

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, P./ Bakvis, H. (1997), The Hollow Crown: Coherence and Capacity in Central Government, in: Weller, P./ Bakvis, H./ Rhodes, R. A. W. (eds.), The Hollow Crown, pp. 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, P./ Bakvis, H./ Rhodes, R. A. W. (eds.) (1997), The Hollow Crown-Countervailing Trends in Core Executives, Basingstoke: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (1999), The Civil Service in the New Millennium, speech given at City University, London, 5. May 1999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flinders, M., Matthews, F. (2007). Rebuilding Strategic Capacity? Multi-Level Governance, Leadership and Public Service Agreements in Britain. In: Koch, R., Dixon, J. (eds) Public Governance and Leadership. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9100-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics