Advertisement

The Problem of Politics: Public Governance and Leadership

  • John Kane

Abstract

Contemporary talk about public governance — as distinct from ‘government’ — emerged at roughly the same time as the introduction of the so-called managerialist reforms into the public sector. This coincidence was significant. The terms governance and managerialism each signalled an intention to break decisively with allegedly outmoded forms of administration. If governance meant something other than government (both are defined in dictionaries as the practice of continuous authority in a political system), it seemed to be in the lesser emphasis that the former placed on hierarchical organisation. Governance suggested a benign structure of mutually supportive, independently active parts rather than the hierarchical, authoritarian mode of rule traditionally associated with government. It also indicated a blurring of the boundary between government agencies and nongovernment actors, who had now become partners in responsibility for the provision of services and the maintenance of regulatory regimes. It implied, according to Rhodes (1996), a change in the very meaning of societal government. The concept was not without its sceptics (Marinetto 2003) and there was no particular consensus on exactly what set of phenomena it was supposed to cover (Kooiman 2003). Yet it was clear enough that the vogue for ‘governance’ was stimulated by a sense that a new way must be found of governing complex societies in a globalising environment, a way better suited to a dynamic, more thoroughly egalitarian and less deferential age.

Keywords

Public Sector Public Servant Democratic Legitimacy Constitutional Democracy Public Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behn, R. D. (1998), What Right do Public Managers Have to Lead?, in: Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman, E. M./ West, J. P./ Bonczek, S. J. (eds.) (1998), The Ethics Edge, Washington D.C.: International City, County Management AssociationGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapman, R. A. (ed.) (1993), Ethics in Public Service, Ottawa: Carleton University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, T. L. (1991), An Ethic of Citizenship for Public Administration, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, T. L. (ed.) (2001), Handbook of Administrative Ethics, 2nd ed., New York: Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
  6. Dale, H. E. (1941), The Higher Civil Service in Great Britain, London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Downs, A. (1967), Inside Bureaucracy, Boston: Little BrownGoogle Scholar
  8. DuBrin, A. J. (2001), Leadership: Research Findings, Practice and Skills, 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
  9. Frederickson, H. G. (ed.) (1993), Ethics and Public Administration, Armonk, New York: M.E. SharpeGoogle Scholar
  10. Fry, G. K. (2000), Three Giants of the Inter-war British Higher Civil Service: Sir Maurice Hankey, Sir Warren Fisher and Sir Horace Wilson, in: Theakston, K. (ed.), Bureaucrats and Leadership, London: Macmillan, pp. 39–67Google Scholar
  11. Gardner, J. W. (1990), On Leadership, New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Gawthrop, L. C. (1998), Public Service and Democracy: Ethical Imperatives for the 21st Century, New York: Chatham House PublishersGoogle Scholar
  13. Gortner, H. F. (1991), Ethics for Public Managers, New York: GreenwoodGoogle Scholar
  14. Kane, J./ Bishop, P. (2002), Consultation and Contest: the Danger of Mixing Modes, in: Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kane, J./ Patapan, H. (2006), In Search of Prudence: the Hidden Problem of Managerial Reform, in: Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. 5, pp. 711–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kernaghan, K. (2003), Integrating Values into Public Service: the Values Statement as Centerpiece, in: Public Administration Review, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kooiman, J. (2003), Governing as Governance, London: SageGoogle Scholar
  18. Marinetto, M. (2003), Governing Beyond the Centre, in: Political Studies, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 592–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Niskanen, W. A. (1973), Bureaucracy: Servant or Master?, Chicago: Aldine-AthertonGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Halpin, E. (1989), Head of the Civil Service: a Study of Sir Warren Fisher, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Osborne, D./ Gaebler, T. (1992), Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  22. Parry, K. (1996), Transformational Leadership: Developing an Enterprising Management Culture, Melbourne: PitmanGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollitt, C. (2003), The Essential Public Manager, Maidenhead: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Pollitt, C./ Bouckaert, G. (2000), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996), The New Governance: Governing Without Government, in: Political Studies, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 652–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rhodes, R. A. W./ Weller, P. (2001), The Changing World of Top Officials, Maidenhead: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Riccucci, N. M. (2000), Excellence in Administrative Leadership: Six US Federal Exucrats, in: Theakston, K. (ed.), Bureaucrats and Leadership, London: Macmillan, pp. 17–38Google Scholar
  28. Richards, D. (1997), The Civil Service Under the Conservatives 1979–97: Whitehall’s Political Poodles?, Brighton: Sussex Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Richards, D. (2000), The Conservatives, New Labour and Whitehall, a Biographical Examination of the Political Flexibility of the Mandarin Cadre, in: Theakston, K. (ed.), Bureaucrats and Leadership, London: Macmillan, pp. 91–118Google Scholar
  30. Robbins, S. P./ Millett, B./ Cacioppe, R./ Waters-Marsh, T. (2001), Organisational Behaviour: Leading and Managing in Australia and New Zealand, 3rd ed., French’s Forest, New South Wales: Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar
  31. Rohr, J. A. (1998), Public Service, Ethics, and Constitutional Practice, Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of KansasGoogle Scholar
  32. Stoker, G. (1998), Governance as Theory, in: International Social Science Journal, Vol. 50, No. 155, pp. 17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Terry, L. D. (1993), Why we Should Abandon the Misconceived Quest to Reconcile Public Entrepreneurship with Democracy, in: Public Administration Review, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 393–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Theakston, K. (ed.) (2000), Bureaucrats and Leadership, London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  35. Tiernan, A. (2007), Power without Representation: Ministerial Staff in Australian Federal Government, Sydney: University of New South Wales PressGoogle Scholar
  36. van Wart, M. (1998), Changing Public Sector Values, New York: Garland PublishingGoogle Scholar
  37. van Wart, M. (2003), Public-Sector Leadership Theory: An Assessment, in: Public Administration Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 214–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weber, M. (1991), Politics as a Vocation, in: Gerth, H. H./ Wright Mills, C. (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Kane
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Politics and Public PolicyGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations