Skip to main content

Empirical Examination of Operational Loss Distributions

  • Chapter
Book cover Perspectives on Operations Research

Abstract

Until very recently, it has been believed that banks are exposed to two main types of risks: credit risk (the counterparty failure risk) and market risk (the risk of loss due to changes in market indicators, such as interest rates and exchange rates), in the order of importance. The remaining financial risks have been put in the category of other risks, operational risk being one of them. Recent developments in the financial industry have shown that the importance of operational risk has been largely under-estimated. Newly defined capital requirements set by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision in 2004, require financial institutions to estimate the capital charge to cover their operational losses [6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bening VE, Korolev VY (2002) Generalized Poisson Models and their Applications in Insurance and Finance. VSP International Science Publishers, Utrecht, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. BIS (1998) Operational risk management. http://www.bis.org

    Google Scholar 

  3. BIS (2001) Consultative document: operational risk. http://www.bis. org

    Google Scholar 

  4. BIS (2001) Working paper on the regulatory treatment of operational risk. http://www.bis.org

    Google Scholar 

  5. BIS (2003) The 2002 loss data collection exercise for operational risk: summary of the data collected. http://www.bis.org

    Google Scholar 

  6. BIS (2004) International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. http://www.bis.org

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chernobai A, Menn C, Rachev ST, Trück S (2005) Estimation of operational value-at-risk in the presence of minimum collection thresholds. Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chernobai A, Menn C, Trück S, Rachev S (2005) A note on the estimation of the frequency and severity distribution of operational losses. Mathematical Scientist 30(2)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chernobai A, Rachev S, Fabozzi F (2005) Composite goodness-of-fit tests for left-truncated loss samples. Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  10. Embrechts P, Klüppelberg C, Mikosch T (1997) Modeling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jorion P (2000) Value-at-Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moscadelli M, Chernobai A, Rachev ST (2005) Treatment of missing data in the field of operational risk: Effects on parameter estimates, EL, UL and CVaR measures. Operational Risk, June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rachev ST, Mittnik S (2000) Stable Paretian Models in Finance. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Samorodnitsky G, Taqqu MS (1994) Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes. Stochastic Models with Infinite Variance. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zolotarev VM (1986) One-dimensional stable distributions. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 65. American Mathematical Society, Providence

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Martin Morlock Christoph Schwindt Norbert Trautmann Jürgen Zimmermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rachev, S.T., Chernobai, A., Menn, C. (2006). Empirical Examination of Operational Loss Distributions. In: Morlock, M., Schwindt, C., Trautmann, N., Zimmermann, J. (eds) Perspectives on Operations Research. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9064-4_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics