Skip to main content

The Problem of Enforcement of Judgments by the Courts

  • Chapter
Court Delay and Law Enforcement in China
  • 527 Accesses

Abstract

Law enforcement, as the last stage of the civil procedure, not only directly affects the rights of the parties, but also the respect for law and the authority of the courts, as well as social stability and economic development. The goal of judgment is to define legal rights among the parties, whereas enforcement of court orders is to realize legal rights, from this point of view, enforcement procedure is the continuation of trial procedure. Law enforcement and its legislature forms an important part of the civil procedure law. The realization of legal rights by law enforcement not only concerns the functioning of the courts, but also the protection of legal rights and the authority of the judiciary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schaefer, H.-B., The Significance of a Well-Functioning Civil Law in the Process of Development, Paper presented at the Conference of the Latin Americans Law and Economics Association in Quito (Ecuador) June 15th to June 17th 1998, Manuscript, 1998, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. This is an unpublished internal report provided by the Supreme People’s Court. See Investigation Report about the implementation of the Regulation on Strict Implementation on Time Limit (2000), by the Research Team of Chongqing High People’s Court, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Supreme People’s Court: Regulation on the Enforcement of Judgments, No. 15 (1998) Legal Interpretation.

    Google Scholar 

  4. According to the People’s Court Organization Act 1954, the courts not only adjudicate the case, but also execute the court orders/decisions by itself due to the few filings in the 1950s. Most of the civil cases were settled by mediation or arbitration rather than by adjudication. The adjudication of cases and enforcement of court orders/decisions thus were under the same tribunal. See He, Lan Jie / Lu, Min Jian (eds.), Judiciary in Contemporary China, Contemporary China Publication, 1993, p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Art. 209 II, Civil Procedure Code (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Supreme People’s Court: Some Opinions on the Application of Civil Procedure Code, 1992. Art 254–265

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Rechtpfleger has, inter alia, responsibility for the local and register, and for seizures of immovable property as well as authorizing garnishment of debts. He also plays a role in guardianship and succession cases, and has recently taken on extensive responsibilities in relation to insolvency proceedings. See German Rechtspflegergesetz (RPflG) § 2 and § 3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. By contrast, under the relevant Spanish law, the categories of enforceable title are comparatively wide. Any private contractual documents can also be used as the basis for enforcement. In France, the French law recognizes a number of types of instruments that allow a creditor to proceed to enforcement. These includes bills of exchange, unpaid checks and unpaid rent arising out of a written contract for the lease of immovable property. See Kennett, Wendy A., Enforcement of Judgments in Europe, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Tong Hai and Zhu, Xiao Long, Is the Court Fee Reasonable? in: China Lawyer (12) 2002, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Only 16.7% of the claim was compensated. Source: Tan, Shi Gui, Research on Judicial Reform in China, China Law Press, 2000, p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ditto.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tan, Shi Gui, Research on Judicial Reform in China, China Law Press, 2000, p. 283. The fiscal income of the city (Haikou) is around 1.4 billion Yuan in 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quoted from Tan, Shi Gui, Research on Judicial Reform in China, China Law Press, 2000, p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I was told by some courts that the normal targeted settlement ratio was around 65% to 78% of the filings for compulsory execution. Furthermore see Luo, Shu Ping (Director of the Enforcement Bureau of the High People’s Court of Si Chuan Province), The Difficulties in Law Enforcement Difficulties and Chaotic Situation, in China Lawyer, (12) 2002, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. China Law Year Book, 1996–1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Calculation based on China Law Year Book, 1991–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Wei Ying / Ke, Rong Zhu, “The adverse selection in civil litigation and its interpretation — an empirical study”, in (2) 2002 China Social Science, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Report from the 5th Bejing University New Year Forum on the topic of ‘Economic Reform and Social Trust’. In: www.sohu.com 07.01.2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Tong Hai and Zhu, Xiao Long, Is the Court Fee Reasonable? in: China Lawyer (12) 2002, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. According to the Annual Report of the Supreme People’s Court, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Regulation on Enforcement of Judgments, by the Supreme People’s Court, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tan, Shi Gui, Research on Judicial Reform in China, China Law Press, 2000, p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Kennett, Wendy A., Enforcement of Judgments in Europe, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 99 ff. It is recommended that, for tracing the immovable property, technological innovation like computerization may be of great help. Internet technology shall be introduced in future and registers shall be open to the general public so that they can get access to the information related to enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, 2000, p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, p. 250.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, 2000, p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Art. 209 II, Civil Procedure Code (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Compare Wu, Dong Yu and Hua, Shi, An Investigation and Comment on the Internal Setup and Categorized Personnel Management of the People’s Courts, in: Zhang, Wei Ping, Review on Judicial Reform, Vol. 4, 2002, p. 463, under Footnote

    Google Scholar 

  30. According to Mr. Luo, Shu Ping, director of the Execution Bureau of the High Court of Si Chuan province, due to the law quality of the personnel, cases are often delayed by the executors by excuses.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kennett, Wendy A., Enforcement of Judgments in Europe, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 77 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Supra note 509, 510.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Supreme People’s Court: Some Opinions on the Application of Civil Procedure Code, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. The Execution Bureau of the High People’s Court of Fujian province, Impossible enforcement and the risk of the private and commercial exchange, in: People’ Judiciary, (10) 2002, pp. 26, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ditto.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, p. 250

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ditto.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, 2000, p. 250. Compare: Schaefer, H.-B., Die Bedeutung des Zivilrechts fuer den Entwicklungsprozess, Braunschweigische Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft, J. CramerVerlag, 2001,p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ditto.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tan, Shi Gui, Research on Judicial Reform in China, China Law Press, 2000, pp. 284, 285, 287.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ditto.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ditto.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Luo, Shu Ping, The Difficulties in Law Enforcement Difficulties and Chaotic Situation, in China Lawyer, (12) 2002, p. 47. Compare: Tan, Shi Gui, Research on Judicial Reform in China, China Law Press, 2000, p. 288.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Luo, Shu Ping (Director of the Execution Bureau of the High People’s Court of Si Chuan Province), The Difficulties in Law Enforcement: Difficulties and Chaotic Situation, in China Lawyer, (12) 2002, pp. 43, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ditto.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ditto, p 47.

    Google Scholar 

  47. There is no specific qualification requirement for executors. Some of the executors do not have systematic legal education and training before taking the work. They are assigned to the job after the calling for reinforcement of enforcement in recent years. See Luo, Shu Ping (Director of the Enforcement Bureau of the High People’s Court of Si Chuan Province), The Difficulties in Law Enforcement: Difficulties and Chaotic Situation, in China Lawyer, (12) 2002, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  48. The Supreme People’s Court, Regulation on Enforcement of Judgments, 1998, Art. 113, 118.

    Google Scholar 

  49. In Civil Procedure Code and relevant regulations it only regulates that the entrusted courts “shall not reject” any assignment by the trial courts (the principal courts), Art. 209 II, Civil Procedure Code (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tan, Shi Gui, Research on Judicial Reform in China, China Law Press, 2000, p. 288; Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, 2000, p. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  51. The Supreme People’s Court, Regulation on Enforcement of Judgments, 1998, Art. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Supra Zhu, Xiao Long, Is the Court Fee Reasonable? in: China Lawyer (12) 2002, p. 40 note 535.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Supra note 525.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Supra note 531

    Google Scholar 

  55. See report from the National People’s Congress Assembly, in www.sina.com.cn 10.03.2003.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Compulsory enforcement mechanism is an important part of the judiciary. There are mainly 3 types of legislature in respect of enforcement law: the first is to incorporate the compulsory enforcement mechanism into the Civil Procedure Code, like Germany; the second is to promulgate a separate enforcement law, like Austria, Japan, Belgium and Taiwan; the third is to incorporate the enforcement mechanism into bankruptcy law and mix it with the bankruptcy legislature, like Swiss land and Turkey. See Liang, Shu Wen, Theory of enforcement and practicing, People’s Court Publication, 1993, pp. 183, 184, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, 2000, p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ditto.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Luo, Shu Ping (Director of the Enforcement Bureau of the High People’s Court of Si Chuan Province), The Difficulties in Law Enforcement: Difficulties and Chaotic Situation, in China Lawyer, (12) 2002, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, 2000, p. 275..

    Google Scholar 

  61. Qi, Shu Jie, Research on Reform of Civil Procedure Law, Xiamen University Press, 2000, p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). The Problem of Enforcement of Judgments by the Courts. In: Court Delay and Law Enforcement in China. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9012-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics