Skip to main content

Using Suitable Key Metrics for the Management of Complexity in Variety-Rich Environments

  • Chapter
Spektrum des Produktions- und Innovationsmanagements

Abstract

In today’s business environment, many companies are striving to extend their product lines. For many of them, the transition from mass manufacturing to flexible and variety-rich production is not a voluntary but a compulsory choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abdelkafi, Nizar (2008): Variety-Induced Complexity in Mass Customization — Concepts and Management, PhD Thesis, Hamburg University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, Dietrich/ Johannwille, Ulrich (1998): Die Komplexitätsfalle, in: Dietrich Adam (Ed.): Komplexitätsmanagement, Schriften zur Unternehmensführung, No. 61, Wiesbaden: Gabler, pp. 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, David (2004): Build-to-Order & Mass Customization — The Ultimate Supply Chain Management and Lean Manufacturing Strategy for Low-Cost On-Demand Production without Forecasts or Inventory, Cambria, California: CIM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Carliss Y./ Clark, Kim B. (2000): Design Rules — The Power of Modularity: Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Charles H. (1990): How to Define Complexity in Physics, and Why, in: Wojciech H. Zurek (Ed.): Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, Volume VIII, Redwood City, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company pp. 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackenfelt, Michael (2001): Managing Complexity by Product Modularisation: Balancing the Aspects of Technology and Business during the Design Process, Doctoral Thesis, Department of Machine Design, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden. URL: http://www.diva-portal.org/kth/abstract.xsql?dbid=3097 (Retrieval: June 1, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blecker, Thorsten/ Friedrich, Gerhard/ Kaluza, Bernd/ Abdelkafi, Nizar/ Kreutler, Gerold (2005): Information and Management Systems for Product Customization, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blecker, Thorsten/ Abdelkafi, Nizar (2006a): Complexity and Variety in Mass Customization Systems: Analysis and recommendations, Management Decision, Vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 908–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blecker, Thorsten/ Abdelkafi, Nizar (2006b): Modularity and Delayed Product Differentiation in Assembleto-Order Systems: Analysis and Extensions from a Complexity Perspective, in: Thorsten Blecker, Gerhard Friedrich (Eds.): Mass Customization: Challenges and Solutions, New York: Springer, pp. 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, Gregory J. (1974): Information-Theoretic Computational Complexity, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, Peter/ Diederichs, Raimund/ Sanders, Falk-Hayo/ Wisniowski, Stefan (1991): SMR Forum: The Management of Complexity, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukh, Abhijit V./ Talavage, Joseph J./ Barash, Moshe M. (1998): Complexity in Manufacturing Systems: Part 1 — Analysis of Static Complexity, IIE Transactions, Vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 645–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, Anna/ Erixon, Gunnar (1999): Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms, Dearborn/Michigan: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Marshall L./ Ittner, Christopher D. (1999): The Impact of Product Variety on Automobile Assembly Operations: Empirical Evidence and Simulation Analysis, Management Science, Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 771–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frizelle, Gerry/ Woodcock, E. (1995): Measuring Complexity as an Aid to Developing Operational Strategy, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, Murray (1994): The Quark and the Jaguar — Adventures in the Simple and the Complex, London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, F./ Gershenson, John K. (2003): Comparison of Modular Measurement Methods Based on Consistency and Sensitivity Analysis, Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holweg, Matthias/ Pil, Frits K. (2004): The Second Century — Reconnecting Customer and Value Chain through Build-to-Order, Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölttä-Otto, Katja/ de Weck, Olivier (2007): Degree of Modularity in Engineering Systems and Products with Technical and Business Constraints, URL: http://strategic.mit.edu/PDF_archive/2%20Refereed%20Journal/2_18_CERA20060315sub.pdf (retrieval: May 29, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, Jianxin/ Tseng, Mitchell (2000): Understanding Product Family for Mass Customization by Developing Commonality Indices, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinkel, Steffen (2005): Anforderungen an die Fertigungstechnik von morgen: Wie verändern sich Variantenzahlen, Losgrößen, Materialeinsatz, Genauigkeitsanforderungen und Produktlebenszyklen tatsächlich? Mitteilungen aus der Produktionsinnovationserhebung, Fraunhofer Institut System und Innovationsforschung, September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kota, Sidhar/ Sethuraman, Kannan/ Miller, Raymond (2000): A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 122, No. 4, pp. 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Hau L./ Tang, Christopher S. (1997): Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation, Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingnau, Volker (1994): Variantenmanagement: Produktionsplanung im Rahmen einer Produktdifferenzierungsstrategie, Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Mark V./ Ishii, Kosuke (1996): Design For Variety: A Methodology For Understanding the Costs of Product Proliferation, Proceedings of The 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineerinflflg Conference, California, August 18–22, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Marc H./ Lehnerd, Alvin P. (1997): The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscato, Donald R. (1976): The Application of the Entropy Measure to the Analysis of Part Commonality in a Product Line, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilles, Volker (2001): Effiziente Gestaltung von Produktordnungssystemen — Eine theoretische und empirische Untersuchung, München: TCW Transfer-Centrum GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine II, B. Joseph (1993): Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Claude E. (1948): A Mathematical Theory of Communication, The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, Zahed/ Rosen, David W. (1998): On the Applicability of Product Variety Design Concepts to Automotive Platform Commonality, Proceedings of DETC’98, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September 13–16, 1998, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivadasan, Suja/ Efstathiou, Janet/ Frizelle, Gerry/ Shirazi, Rabia/ Calinescu, Ani (2002): An Information-Theoretic Methodology for Measuring the Operational Complexity of Supplier-Customer Systems, International Journal of operations and Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 80–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, Nam P. (1999): A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, Nam P. (2005): Complexity: Theory and Applications, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevenot, Henry J. (2003): A Comparison of Commonality Indices for Product Family Design, Master Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treleven, Mark/ Wacker, John G. (1987): The Sources, Measurements, and Managerial Implications of Process Commonality, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 7, No. 1–2, pp. 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Karl T./ Eppinger, Steven D. (2000): Product Design and Development, 2nd Edition, Boston et al.: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blecker, T., Abdelkafi, N. (2008). Using Suitable Key Metrics for the Management of Complexity in Variety-Rich Environments. In: Himpel, F., Kaluza, B., Wittmann, J. (eds) Spektrum des Produktions- und Innovationsmanagements. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5583-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics