Abstract
If there is legal concept that has never ceased to be controversial, it is the concept of property. In recent times, the debate has centred on the concept of intellectual property (IP). This is not surprising: intangible assets have become the cornerstone from which most advanced firms develop their business and survive global competition in times of ever increasing mobility of capital and labour services.
Professor of Public Economics at the Faculty of Economics, Università di Bologna, Italy. I am grateful to Frank Fagan for helpful comments
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anonymous, 2005, “The Disclosure Function of the Patent System (or Lack Thereof)”, Harvard Law Review 118, 2007–2028
Belfanti, C, 2004, “Guilds, Patents, and the Circulation of Technical Knowledge: Northern Italy during the Early Modern Age, Technology and Culture”, 45/3, July 2004, 569–589
Boldrin M. and D. Levine, 2004, “Rent-seeking and innovation”, Journal of Monetary Economics 51, 127–160.
Carlson, D., and P. Scamborova, 2005, “Patent Linchpin for the 21st Century?-Best Mode Revisited”, Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society, February 2005, Volume 87, No. 2, pages 89–112.
Cipolla, C.M., 1972, “The Diffusion of Innovations in Early Modern Europe,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 14, 46–52.
Cohen W., Nelson, R., Walsh J., 2000, “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)”, NBER Working Paper W7552
Cohen, W. M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh (2002), “R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentive to Innovate in Japan and the United States”, Research Policy 31, 1349–1367.
David, P., 1993, “Intellectual property institutions and the Panda’s thumb: patents, copyrights, and trade secrets in economic theory and history” in: Wallerstein, M., Mogee. M.E., Schoen R. (Eds.), Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and technology. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
Denicolò, V., Franzoni L.A., 2003. “The contract theory of patents” International Review of Law and Economics 23, 365–380
F.T.C., 2003, “To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy: A Report by the Federal Trade Commission”, October 2003
Landes W. And R. Posner, 2004, “The political economy of intellectual property reform”, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington.
Landes, W. and R. Posner, 2003, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Lemley, M. and D. Burk, 2003, “Policy Levers in Patent Law”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 89
Leveque, F. and Y. Ménière, 2006, “Patents and Innovation: Friends or Foes?” mimeo. Available at SSRN.
Long, C. 2002, “Patent Signals,” University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 2
Machlup, F., 1968. “Patents,” in International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Collier-MacMillan, London.
Machlup, F., Penrose, E., 1950, “The patent controversy in the Nineteenth century”, The Journal of Economic History 10/1, 1–29
Moser, P., 2005, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth Century World Fairs”, The American Economic Review, Volume 95, Number 4, September 2005, 1214–1236(23).
Moser, P., 2007, “Do Patents Diffuse Localized Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from the Geography of Innovations at Four World’s Fairs, 1851–1915.” Available at SSRN.
National Research Council. 2004, “A Patent System for the 21st Century”, S. Merrill, R. Levin, and M. Myers, editors, Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy, National Academies Press.
Ordover, J., 1991, A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5/1, 43–60.
Plant, A., 1934, “The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions,” Economica, Vol. 1/1, 30–51
Rogers, J.E.T., 1863, “On the rational and working of the patent laws.” Journal of the Statistical Society of London 26, 125
Scherer, M., 2007, “The Political Economy of Patent Policy Reform in the United States”, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington.
Shiff E., 1971, Industrialization without national patents, Princeton University Press, 1971
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franzoni, L.A. (2008). The Contract Theory of Patents in Perspective. In: Eger, T., Bigus, J., Ott, C., von Wangenheim, G. (eds) Internationalisierung des Rechts und seine ökonomische Analyse. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5582-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5582-7_8
Publisher Name: Gabler
Print ISBN: 978-3-8350-0877-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-8350-5582-7
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)