Skip to main content
  • 2349 Accesses

Abstract

If there is legal concept that has never ceased to be controversial, it is the concept of property. In recent times, the debate has centred on the concept of intellectual property (IP). This is not surprising: intangible assets have become the cornerstone from which most advanced firms develop their business and survive global competition in times of ever increasing mobility of capital and labour services.

Professor of Public Economics at the Faculty of Economics, Università di Bologna, Italy. I am grateful to Frank Fagan for helpful comments

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous, 2005, “The Disclosure Function of the Patent System (or Lack Thereof)”, Harvard Law Review 118, 2007–2028

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfanti, C, 2004, “Guilds, Patents, and the Circulation of Technical Knowledge: Northern Italy during the Early Modern Age, Technology and Culture”, 45/3, July 2004, 569–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldrin M. and D. Levine, 2004, “Rent-seeking and innovation”, Journal of Monetary Economics 51, 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D., and P. Scamborova, 2005, “Patent Linchpin for the 21st Century?-Best Mode Revisited”, Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society, February 2005, Volume 87, No. 2, pages 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C.M., 1972, “The Diffusion of Innovations in Early Modern Europe,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 14, 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W., Nelson, R., Walsh J., 2000, “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)”, NBER Working Paper W7552

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh (2002), “R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentive to Innovate in Japan and the United States”, Research Policy 31, 1349–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P., 1993, “Intellectual property institutions and the Panda’s thumb: patents, copyrights, and trade secrets in economic theory and history” in: Wallerstein, M., Mogee. M.E., Schoen R. (Eds.), Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and technology. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denicolò, V., Franzoni L.A., 2003. “The contract theory of patents” International Review of Law and Economics 23, 365–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.T.C., 2003, “To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy: A Report by the Federal Trade Commission”, October 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes W. And R. Posner, 2004, “The political economy of intellectual property reform”, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W. and R. Posner, 2003, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemley, M. and D. Burk, 2003, “Policy Levers in Patent Law”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 89

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveque, F. and Y. Ménière, 2006, “Patents and Innovation: Friends or Foes?” mimeo. Available at SSRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, C. 2002, “Patent Signals,” University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F., 1968. “Patents,” in International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Collier-MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F., Penrose, E., 1950, “The patent controversy in the Nineteenth century”, The Journal of Economic History 10/1, 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, P., 2005, “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth Century World Fairs”, The American Economic Review, Volume 95, Number 4, September 2005, 1214–1236(23).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, P., 2007, “Do Patents Diffuse Localized Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from the Geography of Innovations at Four World’s Fairs, 1851–1915.” Available at SSRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 2004, “A Patent System for the 21st Century”, S. Merrill, R. Levin, and M. Myers, editors, Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy, National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordover, J., 1991, A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5/1, 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, A., 1934, “The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions,” Economica, Vol. 1/1, 30–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J.E.T., 1863, “On the rational and working of the patent laws.” Journal of the Statistical Society of London 26, 125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M., 2007, “The Political Economy of Patent Policy Reform in the United States”, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiff E., 1971, Industrialization without national patents, Princeton University Press, 1971

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Eger Jochen Bigus Claus Ott Georg von Wangenheim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franzoni, L.A. (2008). The Contract Theory of Patents in Perspective. In: Eger, T., Bigus, J., Ott, C., von Wangenheim, G. (eds) Internationalisierung des Rechts und seine ökonomische Analyse. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5582-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics