Skip to main content

Insurance and Tort: Coordination Systems and Imperfect Liability Rules

  • Chapter
Internationalisierung des Rechts und seine ökonomische Analyse

Abstract

Three methods compete, both across and within different legal systems, for coordinating insurance or like benefits (social security, employer provided benefits, etc.) and Tort liability awards: Collateral Source Rule (cumulation), collateral benefits offset (deduction), and subrogation of insurer or provider. It is known in the economics literature that the optimal insurance contract contains subrogatory provisions (Shavell 1987, Sykes 2001). In the presence of a liability system, however, it has been overlooked that subrogation and its alternatives, however, make sense only in a world in which liability rules don’t operate perfectly. Under an imperfect strict liability regime, solely subrogation can induce optimal incentives for risk coverage. In addition, collateral offset reduces, compared to the other two alternative regimes, injurer’s incentives to take care. Under an uncertain negligence rule incorporating causation subrogation still outperforms the other regimes, and especially the benefits deduction rule. Finally, the paper also discusses in informal terms the apparently strong advantage in terms of administrative costs of the collateral offset over subrogation, and points out at several factors that might seriously undermine this opinion. The paper casts doubts upon the trend favoring the elimination of the Collateral Source Rule and adoption of deduction systems, which has already been shown empirically to reduce deterrence (Rubin and Shepherd 2007).

We are thankful to Benito Arruñada, Michael Faure, Carlos Ocaña, Anthony Ogus, Santos Pastor, Alicia Real, Göran Skogh, and participants at Seminars at Carlos III, Ghent, and Pompeu Fabra Universities, for helpful comments and suggestions, to the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (F. Gomez: SEJ2004-05059/JUR SEJ2005-10041, J. Penalva: SEJ2005-03924) and the Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR2005-00470) for financial support, and to Mireia Artigot and Maria Camí for able research assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Birds, J. (1988), Modern Insurance Law, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. S. and Friedman, D. D. (1977), Natural Resources, Uncertainty and General Equilibrium Systems. Essays in Memory of Rafael Lusky, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, E., and Möller, H. (1980), Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, 8th ed., Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, J. E., and Craswell, R. (1984), Some Effects of Uncertainty in Compliance with Legal Standards, Virginia Law Review, 70, 965–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craswell, R., and Calfee, J. E. (1986), Deterrence and Uncertain Legal Standards, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 2, 279–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzon, P. M. (1984), Tort Reform and the Role of Government in Private Insurance Markets, Journal of Legal Studies, 13, 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danzon, P. M. (1986), The Frequency and Severity of Medical Malpractice Claims, Law and Contemporary Problems, 49, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. (1977), Insurance Theoretic Aspects of Workers’ Compensation, in Blinder, A.S. and Friedman, Ph. (eds.), Natural resources, uncertainty and general equilibrium systems, New York, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. A. (1977), Coordination of Workers’ Compensation Benefits with Tort Damage Awards, Forum, 13, 464–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. A. (1982), The Historical Origins and Economic Structure of Workers’ Compensation Law, Georgia Law Review, 16, 775–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganuza, J., and Gomez, F. (2008, forthcoming), Realistic Standards — Optimal Negligence with Limited Liability, Journal of Legal Studies, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geigel, R. (1990), Der Haftpflichtprozess, 20th ed., München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, M. (1983), A New Positive Economic Theory of Negligence, Yale Law Journal, 92, 799–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady, M. (1988), Why Are People Negligent? Technology, Nondurable Precautions, and the Medical Malpractice Explosion, Northwestern Law Review, 82, 293–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, F., James, F. and Gray, O. (1986), The Law of Torts, v.4, 2nd ed., Boston-Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, M. (1989), Causation and Incentives to Take Care Under the Negligence Rule, Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 427–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeton, R. and Widiss, A. (1988), Insurance Law, St. Paul, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, H. (1990), Schadensersatz, 2nd ed., München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larenz, K. (1981), Lehrbuch des Schuldrecht, Vol. II.2., München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, K. (1982), Third Party Action Over Against Workers’ Compensation Employer, Duke Law Journal, 1989, 483–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levmore, S. (1982), Self-assessed Valuation Systems for Tort and Other Law, Virginia Law Review 68, 771–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (1999), Deducting Benefits from Damages for Personal Injury, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P. H., and Shepherd, J. M. (2007), Tort Reform and Accidental Deaths, Journal of Law & Economics, 50, 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. (1982), On Liability and Insurance, Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. (1986), The Judgement Proof Problem, International Review of Law and Economics 6, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. (1987), Economic Analysis of Accident Law, Cambridge (Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, A. O. (2001), Subrogation and Insolvency, Journal of Legal Studies, 30, 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1991), Reforming Products Liability, Cambridge (Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, P. C. (1989), Workers’ Compensation and Products Liability: The Interaction of a Tort and a Non-Tort Regime, Ohio State Law Journal, 50, 825–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, P. C. (1991), Medical Malpractice on Trial, Cambridge (Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Eger Jochen Bigus Claus Ott Georg von Wangenheim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gomez, F., Penalva, J. (2008). Insurance and Tort: Coordination Systems and Imperfect Liability Rules. In: Eger, T., Bigus, J., Ott, C., von Wangenheim, G. (eds) Internationalisierung des Rechts und seine ökonomische Analyse. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5582-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics