Skip to main content

Abstract

Classical and neoclassical economics regard all men as egoists who are only interested in their own well-being. Nev ertheless, these egoists are trustworthy, stand to contracts and obey the law. Nowadays, modern economics models people as opportunists who are sel fish without any constraints. Opportunists would lie or even commit crimes, as long as they gain personally from doing so, even if only marginally. Agency theory analyses and designs constraints, in order to induce opportunists to behave as well as possible. However, these outer restrictions on egoistic preferences with no inner limitations seem too narrow. As well as economists are not interested in the content of egoistical preferences, they should not limit the autonomy of individuals to egoistic ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G.A.: The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 1970, pp. 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.; Debreu, G.: The Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. In: Econometrica 22(3), 1954, pp. 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S.: A Theory of Social Interactions. In: Journal of Political Economy 82(6), 1974, pp. 1063–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S.: The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H.: The Nature of the Firm. In: Economica 4(16), 1937, pp. 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H.: The Problem of Social Cost. In: Journal of Law and Economics 3(1), 1960, pp. 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, New York: Wiley 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E.; Gächter, S.: Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3), 2000, pp. 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S.: How Intrinsic Motivation Is Crowded Out and In. In: Rationality and Society 6(3), 1994, pp. 334–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S.; Oberholzer-Gee, F.: The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out. In: American Economic Review 87(4), 1997, pp. 746–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B.R.: Moral Hazard and Observability. In: Bell Journal of Economics 10(1), 1979, pp. 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, Vol. III: Of Morals. London: T. Longman 1740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. London: A. Millar 1751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives. In: American Economic Review 87(2), 1997, pp. 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M.; Milgrom, P.; Roberts, J.; Wilson, R.: Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma. In: Journal of Economic Theory 27(2), 1982, pp. 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M.; Wilson, R.: Sequential Equilibria. In: Econometrica 50(4), 1982, pp. 863–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer 1935; 1959 first English edition: Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.J.: The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. In: American Economic Review 63(2), Papers and Proceedings, 1973, pp. 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Two Volumes. London and Edinburgh: A. Millar, A. Kincaid and J. Bell 1759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Two Volumes. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell 1776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A.M.: Job Market Signaling. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3), 1973, pp. 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E.: Incentives and Risk Sharing in Sharecropping. In: Review of Economic Studies 41(2), 1974, pp. 219–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E.: The Theory of “Screening”, Education, and the Distribution of Income. In: American Economic Review 65(3), 1975 pp. 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.: Calculativeness, Trust and Economic Organization. In: Journal of Law and Economics 36(1), 1993, pp. 453–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Andreas Georg Scherer Moritz Patzer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr.Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dilger, A. (2008). Economics with Ethical Preferences. In: Scherer, A.G., Patzer, M. (eds) Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Unternehmensethik. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5565-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics