Skip to main content

Operationalization of the Research Model

  • Chapter
  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

The following chapter presents the operationalization of the research model. First, basic aspects of the operationalization are described, and then the operationalization of the design variables of early warning behavior follows with its two steps, scanning and interpretation. The third paragraph explains the operationalization of the contingency variables. These are environmental uncertainty and managerial attitudes. Finally, the operationalization of success measures used in this work is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Nunnally (1978), p. 2. For a detailed introduction to constructs and their indicators see F 2.2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Churchill Jr. (1979), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Bortz and Döring (2003), p. 253 and 53ff.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Hambrick (1981), p. 305 and Hambrick (1982), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Culnan (1983), p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Elenkov (1997), p. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See McGee and Sawyerr (2003), p. 391f.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Chenhall and Morris (1986), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Yasai-Ardekani and Nystrom (1996), p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Jung (1921), p. 123f.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Fahey, King and Narayanan (1981), p. 35. They examine the use of instruments within the process of early warning. See also Herzhoff (2004), p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Duncan (1972), p. 314 and Garg, Walters and Priem (2003), p. 726.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Gordon and Narayanan (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. This construct is for example used by Chong and Chong who analyze the relationship between environmental uncertainty, strategic decisions, management accounting systems and performance. See Chong and Chong (1997), p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Chenhall and Morris (1986), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See for example Gul and Chia (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chenhall (2003), p. 138. See also Miller (1993), p. 698.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Downey, Hellriegel and Slocum (1975), p. 621ff.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Duncan (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Various researchers varied this scale in minor ways. For example Garg et al. omit the suppliers and considered only six sectors. See Garg, Walters and Priem (2003), p. 732.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Pfeffer and Salancik (1978), p. 269, Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), p. 131f. and Elenkov (1997), p. 288.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Elenkov (1997), p. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Sawyerr (1993), p. 292. The only difference is that Sawyerr uses a five-point-Likert scale. This concept is further applied by McGee and Sawyerr (2003). See McGee and Sawyerr (2003), p. 391.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), p. 130, Sawyerr (1993), p. 292 and Elenkov (1997), p. 296. In accordance with these researchers, the notions ‘environmental uncertainty’, ‘environmental complexity’, ‘environmental rate of change’ and ‘environmental importance’ are adopted although they do not indicate the subjective character of these measures.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), p. 128f.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Elenkov (1997), p. 295.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Sawyerr (1993), p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See May, Stewart and Sweo (2000), p. 410.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Child (1972), p. 4 and see Duncan (1972), p. 314f.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Duncan (1972), p. 316f. and Osborn and Hunt (1974), p. 233f.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Osborn and Hunt (1974), p. 234f.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See Hickson, Hining, Lee, Schneck and Pennings (1971), p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lefcourt (1991), p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See Jakoby and Jacob (1999), Jakoby and Jacob (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  38. See Rost-Schaude (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  39. See Rotter (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Furnham (1994), p. 404. See also McCaskey (1976), p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Dalbert (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  42. See for example Steiners (2005), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See Jenkins (1987), p. 923f. and Hansemark (2003), p. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See Modick (1977). Modick’s construct of need for achievement is strongly based on Hermann’s construct. See Hermans (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  45. See Kogan and Wallach (1964), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See Seipel (2004). This construct is the translation of the self-control scale of Grasmick, Tittle, Bursik and Arneklev (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  47. The other aspects are impulsiveness, simple tasks, physical activities, self-centredness and temper. See Seipel (2004) and Grasmick, Tittle, Bursik and Arneklev (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  48. See McGuire (1977), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  49. See Rubin and Peplau (1973), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  50. See Christoph, Jardin, Lippl, Stark and Wegener (1998), p. 52f. See also Stark, Liebig and Wegener (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  51. See Diessner, D. and Dolen (1993), p. 869.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See Krettenauer and Becker (2001) and Krettenauer (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  53. See Gibbs (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  54. See Krettenauer and Becker (2001), p. 189f. and Basinger, Gibbs and Fuller (1995), p. 542f.

    Google Scholar 

  55. See Hunt and Chonko (1984), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  56. See Christie (1970), p. 17. See Shackleton, Pitt and Marks (1985), p. 11f. for a detailed discussion of Machiavellianism and Christie’s construct.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See Cloetta (1974), Cloetta (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wrightsman (1991), p. 404.

    Google Scholar 

  59. See Rosenberg (1957), p. 26f. and Wrightsman (1991), p. 404f.

    Google Scholar 

  60. See Naman and Slevin (1993), p. 114f.

    Google Scholar 

  61. See Boeker (1997), p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See Dehler (2001), p. 227 and Bauer (2002), p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  63. See Garg, Walters and Priem (2003), p. 733.

    Google Scholar 

  64. See Durand (2003), p. 827.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See Thornton (1968), p. 451ff. and Chong and Chong (1997), p. 274.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See Garg, Walters and Priem (2003), p. 733 and the there mentioned sources.

    Google Scholar 

  67. See Yasai-Ardekani and Nystrom (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid., p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  69. See Daft and Weick (1984), p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

  70. See Steiners (2005), p. 112 and the sources mentioned there. See also Garg, Walters and Priem (2003), p. 733.

    Google Scholar 

  71. See Günther (1997), p. 50ff.

    Google Scholar 

  72. See Dess, Ireland and Hitt (1990), p. 8ff. The same is true for strategic groups. See Hatten, Schendel and Cooper (1978), p. 601. See also Schäffer and Willauer (2003), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  73. See Dehler (2001), p. 425.

    Google Scholar 

  74. See Steiners (2005), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Operationalization of the Research Model. In: A Contingency-Based View of Chief Executive Officers’ Early Warning Behavior. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5504-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics