Advertisement

Abstract

“Organizations depend on the environment [...] and often must cope with unstable, unpredictable external events.”1 They can anticipate these events that affect the organization by early warning,2 a two-step process that comprises scanning the environment3 and interpreting these data into information about opportunities and risks for the organization.4

Keywords

Early Warning Early Warning System Contingency Variable Organizational Environment Economic Success 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), p. 123. See also Hambrick (1981), p. 299, Chakravarthy (1997), p. 69 and Zahra and Bogne (2000), p. 135ff. The dependency of organizations on the environment is also analyzed by Brown (1966), p. 322.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    See Daft and Weick (1984), p. 290, May, Stewart and Sweo (2000), p. 403, Hambrick (1982), p. 159f., Culnan (1983), p. 194, Tushman (1977), p. 588 and Jemison (1984), p. 133.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    See Daft and Weick (1984), p. 290.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Andrews (1980), p. 48.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    For the strategic importance of anticipating trends see Aguilar (1967), p. 1, Steiner (1969), p. 15ff. and Hofer and Schendel (1978), p. 47, who calls it environmental analysis.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    See Hambrick (1982), p. 159, Lawrence (1981), p. 321ff., Channon (1979), p. 123 and Huber (1984), p. 929.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    See Hedberg, Nystrom and Starbuck (1976), p. 47f. and Bluedorn, Johnson, Cartwright and Barringer (1994), p. 201f.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    See Huygens, Baden-Fuller, van den Bosch and Volberda (2001), p. 971ff.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    See Lawrence and Lorsch (1967), p. 84ff.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    See Miller and Friesen (1977), Subramanian, Fernandes and Harper (1993), Subramanian, Kumar and Yauger (1994) and Thornhill and Amit (2003).Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    See Cockburn, Henderson and Stern (2000), p. 1123 and Kunze (2000), p. 169ff. He considers the anticipation of risks and chances as an important resource that leads to leadership in the market. See also Fritz (1990), p. 496, Kirzner (1978), p. 11 and Kröger (2001), p. 9ff. For time as a competitive advantage see Simon (1988) p. 79ff.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Amit and Schoemaker (1993), p. 35.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Powell (2001), p. 875.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    See Barney (2001), p. 644.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    See De Figueiredo (2000), p. 50.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    See Henderson (2004) and Lee and Lee (2005).Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    See Bundesamt’ (2005), p. 20f.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    See for example Sull (1999), p. 47.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    See Lück (1998), p.9ff., Kröger (2001), p. 12ff. and Hahn, Weber and Friedrich (2000). A specific law for limited liability companies does not exist as the legislator assumes the same responsibility for them depending on their size and structure. See Lück (1998), p. 1926.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    See Wall (2002).Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    See Aguilar (1967), Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), Sawyerr (1993), Elenkov (1997), May, Stewart and Sweo (2000), McGee and Sawyerr (2003) and Garg, Walters and Priem (2003).Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    See Müller (1987), p. 152 and Krystek and Müller-Stewens (1993), p. VI.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    See Daft and Weick (1984), p. 286.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    See Nottenburg and Fedor (1983), p. 315ff., Isabella (1990), p. 8f. and Crossan, Lane and White (1999), p. 528f.Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    See for example Banerjee (2001). On the organizational level research has already been conducted. See for example Schneider (1997), Durand (2003)g and B 2.4.Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    See for example Burns and Stalker (1961) and Woodward (1975).Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    See Lewin and Stephens (1994), p. 187f. and Yasai-Ardekani and Nystrom (1996), p. 188.Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    See Aguilar (1967), Daft, Sormunen and Parks (1988), Sawyerr (1993), Elenkov (1997), May, Stewart and Sweo (2000), McGee and Sawyerr (2003) and Garg, Walters and Priem (2003).Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    See Yasai-Ardekani and Nystrom (1996).Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    See Child (1972), p. 13, Miller and Dröge (1986), p. 539 and Lewin and Stephens (1994), p. 185.Google Scholar
  31. 33.
    See Magnusson (1981).Google Scholar
  32. 34.
    See Kenrick and Dantchik (1983).Google Scholar
  33. 35.
    See Hambrick (1981) and Hambrick (1982).Google Scholar
  34. 36.
    See Fisher (1996).Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    See Scribner and Handler (1987).Google Scholar
  36. 38.
    See Yasai-Ardekani and Nystrom (1996).Google Scholar
  37. 39.
    See Miller and Friesen (1977).Google Scholar
  38. 40.
    See Subramanian, Fernandes and Harper (1993).Google Scholar
  39. 41.
    See Subramanian, Kumar and Yauger (1994).Google Scholar
  40. 42.
    See Lewin and Stephens (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2007

Personalised recommendations