Introduction to Construct Measurement


Scales concisely show how a theoretical construct has been empirically measured. Their reliability and validity ratios give a notion of the quality of the scale. Since most scales are developed by the respective authors and are therefore in a first version, they can be used as a basis for supplementation and further development.


Exploratory Factor Analysis Item Response Theory True Score Error Score Classical Test Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J. C./ Gerbing, D. W. (1984): The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis, in: Psychometrika, 49, pp. 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C./ Gerbing, D. W. (1988): Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, pp. 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhaus, K./ Erichson, B./ Plinke, W./ Weiber, R. (2003): Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 10th edition, Berlin et al. 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P./ Baumgartner, H. (1994): The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models and Hypothesis Testing, in: Bagozzi, R. P. (Ed.): Principles of Marketing Research, Cambridge 1994, pp. 386–422.Google Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. P./ Phillips, L. W. (1982): Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagozzi, R. P./ Yi, Y./ Phillips, L. W. (1991): Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 421–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollen, K. A./ Long, J.S. (1993): Testing Structural Equation Models, Newbury Park 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Carmines, E. G./ Zeller, R. A. (1979): Reliability and Validity Assessment, Beverly Hills et al. 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Churchill Jr., G. A. (1979): A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, pp. 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Churchill Jr., G. A. (1991): Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, 5. ed., Chicago et al. 1991.Google Scholar
  11. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 16, pp. 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cudeck, R./ Browne, M. W. (1983): Cross-Validation of Covariance Structures, in: Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 18, pp. 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fornell, C. (1982): A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, New York 1982.Google Scholar
  14. Hartung, J./ Elpelt, B. (1992): Multivariate Statistik: Lehr-und Handbuch der Angewandten Statistik, München et al. 1992.Google Scholar
  15. Homburg, C. (2000): Kundennähe von Industriegüterunternehmen: Konzeption — Erfolgswirkungen — Determinanten, 3rd edition, Wiesbaden 2000.Google Scholar
  16. Homburg, C./ Baumgartner, H. (1995): Beurteilung von Kausalmodellen — Bestandsaufnahme und Anwendungsempfehlungen, in: Marketing — Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, Vol. 17, pp. 162–176.Google Scholar
  17. Homburg, C./ Giering, A. (1996): Konzeptualisierung und Operationalisierung komplexer Konstrukte: Ein Leitfaden für die Marketingforschung, in: Marketing — Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, Vol. 18, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
  18. Hu, L./ Bentler, P. M. (1998): Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification, in: Psychological Methods, Vol. 3, pp. 424–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu, L./ Bentler, P. M./ Kano, Y. (1992): Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?, in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 112, pp. 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jöreskog, K. G./ Sörbom, D. (2001): LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Lincolnwood 2001.Google Scholar
  21. Kaiser, H. F. (1974): An Index of Factor Simplicity, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 39, pp. 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Long, J. S. (1983): Covariance Structure Models: An Introduction to LISREL, Beverly Hills 1983.Google Scholar
  23. Lord, F. M./ Novick, M. R. (1968): Statistical theories of mental test scores, Reading 1968.Google Scholar
  24. Malhotra, N. K./ Birks, D. F. (2003): Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, 3rd ed., London et al. 2003.Google Scholar
  25. Marsh, H. W./ Grayson, D. (1995): Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data, in: R. Hoyle (Ed.): Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications, Thousand Oaks 1995, pp. 177–198.Google Scholar
  26. Moosbrugger, H. (in press): Klassische Testtheorie, in: Moosbrugger, H./ Kelava, A. (Eds.): Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion, Berlin in press.Google Scholar
  27. Moosbrugger, H./ Schermelleh-Engel, K. (in press): Exploratorische (EFA) und Konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse (CFA), in: Moosbrugger, H./ Kelava, A. (Eds.): Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion, Berlin in press.Google Scholar
  28. Norušis, M. J. (1993): SPSS for Windows: Professional Statistics, Release 6.0, Chicago 1993.Google Scholar
  29. Nunnally, J. C./ Bernstein, I. H. (1994): Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., New York et al. 1994.Google Scholar
  30. Peter, J. P. (1979): Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, pp. 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson, R. A. (1994): A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, pp. 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H./ Müller, H. (2003): Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures, in: Methods of Psychological Research-Online, Vol. 8, pp. 23–74.Google Scholar
  33. Schermelleh-Engel, K./ Werner, C.S. (in press): Methoden der Reliabilitätsbestimmung, in: Moosbrugger, H./ Kelava, A. (Eds.): Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion, Berlin in press.Google Scholar
  34. Sharma, S. (1996): Applied Multivariate Techniques, New York et al. 1996.Google Scholar
  35. Van der Linden, W. J./ Hambleton, R. K. (1997): Handbook of modern item response theory, New York 1997.Google Scholar
  36. Westen, D./ Rosenthal, R. (2003): Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures, in: Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, Vol. 84, pp. 608–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag | GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden 2007

Personalised recommendations