Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Erfahrung und Lernen in Vertragsbeziehungen

  • Chapter
Lernen in Vertragsbeziehungen

  • 943 Accesses

Auszug

Nachdem bisher die Rolle von Verträgen unter einem statischen, der Transaktionskostentheorie folgenden Blickwinkel diskutiert wurde, kommt in diesem Kapitel 3 eine dynamische Perspektive zum Ausdruck, die den Einfluss früherer Erfahrungen auf die Vertragsgestaltung berücksichtigt. Nach einer kurzen Einführung zur Bedeutung von aus Erfahrung resultierenden Lerneffekten für das Management von Unternehmenskooperationen insgesamt (3.1), erfolgt die Schilderung der hierfür zentralen Theorieansätze Evolutionary Economics, Organizational Learning und Knowledge-based View (3.2). Hiernach wird der Stand der empirischen Forschung zur Auswirkung von Erfahrung und Lernen auf das Management von Unternehmenskooperationen im Allgemeinen und auf Verträge im Besonderen dargestellt (3.3). Den Abschluss des Kapitels bildet die Ableitung einer zweiten Gruppe von Hypothesen, die den Einfluss von Erfahrung und Lernen auf die unterschiedlichen Vertragsfunktionen zum Gegenstand haben (3.4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

o

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, A./ de la Torre, J. (1998): Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures, in: Organization Science, 9, 3, S. 306–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G. (2003): Alliance form: A test of the contractual and competence perspectives, in: Strategic Management Journal, 24, S. 1209–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C. (1998): Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances, in: Academy of Management Executive, 12, 4, S. 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H./ Perlmutter, H. (2000): Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, 3, S. 217–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, S. 1009–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1150–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H./ Perlmutter, H. (2000): Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, 3, S. 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. K. (2002): Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: Learning-by-doing and learning myopia, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, 9, S. 836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H./ Perlmutter, H. (2000): Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, 3, S. 220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991): Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, in: Organization Science, 2, 1, S. 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. K. (2002): Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: Learning-by-doing and learning myopia, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, 9, S. 836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991): Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, in: Organization Science, 2, 1, S. 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M. B./ Echambadi, R./ Ford, C. (2003): Learning to collaborate: The effects of experiential and vicarious learning on alliance performance, working paper, University of Central Florida, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA. 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991): Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, in: Organization Science, 2, 1, S. 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M./ March, J. G. (1963): A behavioral theory of the firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L./ Ingram, P./ Levine, J. M./ Moreland, R. L. (2000): Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 1, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Zollo, M. (2005): Termination outcomes of research alliances, in: Research Policy, 34, S. 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, A./ Reuer, J. J. (2005): Alliance contractual design, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L.,/ Mayer, K. J. (2005): Building contract capabilities with standard form contracts: Selecting the content, usage, and negotiating party, working paper, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. R./ Winter, S. G. (1982): An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, MA 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. R./ Winter, S. G. (1982): An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, MA 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M./ Bacdayan, P. (1994): Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study, in: Organization Science, 5, S. 554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. R./ Winter, S. G. (1982): An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, MA 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. R./ Winter, S. G. (1982): An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, MA 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Zollo, M. (2005): Understanding partnering processes and outcomes: The contribution of evolutionary theory, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Zollo, M. (2005): Understanding partnering processes and outcomes: The contribution of evolutionary theory, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Zollo, M. (2005): Understanding partnering processes and outcomes: The contribution of evolutionary theory, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M./ March, J. G. (1963): A behavioral theory of the firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Zollo, M. (2005): Understanding partnering processes and outcomes: The contribution of evolutionary theory, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Argyres, N. S. (2004): Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry, in: Organization Science, 15, 4, S. 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragonetti, N. C./ Antonacopoulou P. E./ Broekhuizen M. C. S./ Patnaik, S. (2005): Organizational learning: A review, a critique and a way forward, working paper, University of Liverpool, presented at the First Organization Studies Workshop Theorizing Process in Organizational Research, Santorini 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragonetti, N. C./ Antonacopoulou P. E./ Broekhuizen M. C. S./ Patnaik, S. (2005): Organizational learning: A review, a critique and a way forward, working paper, University of Liverpool, presented at the First Organization Studies Workshop Theorizing Process in Organizational Research, Santorini 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, M. C./ Lyles, M. A. (1985): Organizational learning, in: Academy of Management Review, 10, 4, S. 803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D./ Crossan, M. (2003): Organizational learning and knowledge management: toward an integrative framework, in: Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Oxford, S. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, M. C./ Lyles, M. A. (1985): Organizational learning, in: Academy of Management Review, 10, 4, S. 811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. M./ Thomas, A. (1984): Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity, in. Academy of Management Review, 9, S. 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B. (1984): The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries, in: Rand Journal of Economics, 15, S. 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. (1999): Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C./ Ingram, P. (1998): Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898-1980, in: Management Science, 44, S. 996–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, S. 1009–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C./ Schön, D. A. (1978): Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, Reading, MA 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B. (1981): How organizations learn and unlearn, in: Nystrom, P. C./ Starbuck, W. H. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Organizational Design, London, S. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, M. C./ Lyles, M. A. (1985): Organizational learning, in: Academy of Management Review, 10, 4, S. 804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B./ March, J. G. (1988): Organizational learning, in: Annual Review of Sociology, 14, S. 322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991): Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, in: Organization Science, 2, 1, S. 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L./ Ingram, P. (2000): Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 1, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. R./ Prahalad, C. K. (1996): A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism, in: Organization Science, 7, 5, S. 477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994): A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, in: Organization Science, 15, 1, S.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994): A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, in: Organization Science, 15, 1, S.16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966): The tacit dimension, London 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966): The tacit dimension, London 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B./ Zander, U. (1992): Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, in: Organization Science, 3, 3, S. 389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994): A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, in: Organization Science, 15, 1, S.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994): A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, in: Organization Science, 15, 1, S.19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. H. (2004): Developing alliance capabilities, Eindhoven. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Argyres, N. S. (2004): Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry, in: Organization Science, 15, 4, S. 394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Ariño, A. (2002): Contractual renegotiations in strategic alliances, in: Journal of Management, 28, 1, S. 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, S. 1009–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1150–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Ariño, A. (2002): Contractual renegotiations in strategic alliances, in: Journal of Management, 28, 1, S. 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Argyres, N. S. (2004): Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry, in: Organization Science, 15, 4, S. 394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethiraj, S. K./ Kale, P./ Krishnan, M. S./ Singh, J. V. (2005): Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1, S. 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethiraj, S. K./ Kale, P./ Krishnan, M. S./ Singh, J. V. (2005): Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1, S. 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Zollo, M./ Singh, H. (2002): Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethiraj, S. K./ Kale, P./ Krishnan, M. S./ Singh, J. V. (2005): Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1, S. 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethiraj, S. K./ Kale, P./ Krishnan, M. S./ Singh, J. V. (2005): Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1, S. 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethiraj, S. K./ Kale, P./ Krishnan, M. S./ Singh, J. V. (2005): Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1, S. 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Zollo, M./ Singh, H. (2002): Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Zollo, M./ Singh, H. (2002): Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Liebeskind, J. P. (1999): Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory, in: Academy of Management Review, 24, 1, S. 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L.,/ Mayer, K. J. (2005): Building contract capabilities with standard form contracts: Selecting the content, usage, and negotiating party, working paper, University of Southern California. 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Liebeskind, J. P. (1999): Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory, in: Academy of Management Review, 24, 1, S. 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995): Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances, in: Academy of Management Journal, 38, S. 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995): Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances, in: Academy of Management Journal, 38, S. 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui, S. S./ Ngo, H. (2004): The role of trust and contractual safeguards in non-equity alliances, in: Journal of Management, 30, 4, S. 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, S. (1963): Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study, in: American Sociological Review, 28, 1, S. 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellewigt, T./ Madhok, A./ Weibel, A. (2006): Trust and formal contracts in interorganizational relationships—Substitutes and complements, working paper, University of Paderborn, forthcoming in Managerial & Decision Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L./ Zenger, T. (2002): Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, A./ Reuer, J. J. (2005): Alliance contractual design, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (1997): Effective interfirm cooperation: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value, in: Strategic Management Journal, 18, S. 547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995): Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances, in: Academy of Management Journal, 38, S. 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Zollo, M. (2005): Termination outcomes of research alliances, in: Research Policy, 34, S. 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Zollo, M. (2005): Termination outcomes of research alliances, in: Research Policy, 34, S. 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, A./ Reuer, J. J. (2005): Alliance contractual design, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M./ Sampson, R. C. (2004): Repeated interactions & contract structure: Evidence from technology development contracts, working paper, Melbourne Business School. 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, S. S./ Ngo, H. (2004): The role of trust and contractual safeguards in non-equity alliances, in: Journal of Management, 30, 4, S. 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellewigt, T./ Madhok, A./ Weibel, A. (2006): Trust and formal contracts in interorganizational relationships—Substitutes and complements, working paper, University of Paderborn, forthcoming in Managerial & Decision Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corts, K. S./ Singh, J. (2004): The effect of repeated interaction on contract choice: Evidence from offshore drilling, in: Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 20, 1, 230–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Ariño, A. (2007): Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity, in: Strategic Management Journal, 28, S. 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Ariño, A. (2002): Contractual renegotiations in strategic alliances, in: Journal of Management, 28, 1, S. 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M./ Sampson, R. C. (2004): Repeated interactions & contract structure: Evidence from technology development contracts, working paper, Melbourne Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Bercovitz, J./ Mayer, K. J. (2007): Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts, in: Organization Science, 18, 1, S. 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnins, A./ Mayer, K. J. (2004): Relationships and hybrid contracts: An analysis of contract choice in information technology, in: Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 20, 1, S. 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Bercovitz, J. (2005): The influence of inertia on contract design: Contingency planning in information technology service contracts, working paper, University of Southern California, forthcoming in Managerial & Decision Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, B. (2001): Cooperation contracts between embedded firms, in: Organization Studies, 22, 5, S. 825–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2002): Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 903–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L./ Zenger, T. (2002): Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L./ Zenger, T. (2002): Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L./ Zenger, T. (2002): Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, B. (2001): Cooperation contracts between embedded firms, in: Organization Studies, 22, 5, S. 841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corts, K. S./ Singh, J. (2004): The effect of repeated interaction on contract choice: Evidence from offshore drilling, in: Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 20, 1, 258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnins, A./ Mayer, K. J. (2004): Relationships and hybrid contracts: An analysis of contract choice in information technology, in: Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 20, 1, S. 227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobrero, M./ Roberts, E. B. (2002): Strategic management of supplier-manufacturer relations in new product development, in: Research Policy, 31, 1, S. 172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corts, K. S./ Singh, J. (2004): The effect of repeated interaction on contract choice: Evidence from offshore drilling, in: Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 20, 1, 230–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnins, A./ Mayer, K. J. (2004): Relationships and hybrid contracts: An analysis of contract choice in information technology, in: Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 20, 1, S. 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L./ Zenger, T. (2002): Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corts, K. S./ Singh, J. (2004): The effect of repeated interaction on contract choice: Evidence from offshore drilling, in: Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 20, 1, 230–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Bercovitz, J. (2005): The influence of inertia on contract design: Contingency planning in information technology service contracts, working paper, University of Southern California, forthcoming in Managerial & Decision Economics. 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Argyres, N. S. (2004): Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry, in: Organization Science, 15, 4, S. 402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M./ Sampson, R. C. (2004): Repeated interactions & contract structure: Evidence from technology development contracts, working paper, Melbourne Business School. 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Ariño, A. (2007): Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity, in: Strategic Management Journal, 28, S. 326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Bercovitz, J./ Mayer, K. J. (2007): Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts, in: Organization Science, 18, 1, S. 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Ariño, A. (2007): Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity, in: Strategic Management Journal, 28, S. 326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M./ Sampson, R. C. (2004): Repeated interactions & contract structure: Evidence from technology development contracts, working paper, Melbourne Business School 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnins, A./ Mayer, K. J. (2004): Relationships and hybrid contracts: An analysis of contract choice in information technology, in: Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 20, 1, S. 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M./ Sampson, R. C. (2004): Repeated interactions & contract structure: Evidence from technology development contracts, working paper, Melbourne Business School 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Bercovitz, J. (2005): The influence of inertia on contract design: Contingency planning in information technology service contracts, working paper, University of Southern California, forthcoming in Managerial & Decision Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Argyres, N. S. (2004): Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry, in: Organization Science, 15, 4, S. 398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M./ Sampson, R. C. (2004): Repeated interactions & contract structure: Evidence from technology development contracts, working paper, Melbourne Business School 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C./ Willcocks, L. P. (1998): An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience, in: MIS Quarterly, 22, 3, S. 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Zollo, M./ Singh, H. (2002): Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draulans, J./ deMan, A.-P./ Volberda, H. W. (2003): Building alliance capability: Management techniques for superior alliance performance, in: Long Range Planning, 36, 2, S. 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. H./ Duysters, G. (2007): Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process, in: Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1, S. 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 332–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T./ Deeds, D. L. (2006): Alliance type, alliance experience, and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 21, S. 443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, S. 1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G./ Shenkar, O./ Vermeulen, F./ Bell, J. H. J. (1997): Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 2, S. 431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T./ Deeds, D. L. (2006): Alliance type, alliance experience, and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 21, S. 451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Reuer, J. J./ Singh, H. (2002): Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances, in: Organization Science, 13, 6, S. 707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, S. 1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, S. 1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draulans, J./ deMan, A.-P./ Volberda, H. W. (2003): Building alliance capability: Management techniques for superior alliance performance, in: Long Range Planning, 36, 2, S. 156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D./ Hitt, M. A./ Vaidyanath, D. (2002): Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage, in: Journal of Management, 28, 3, S. 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T./ Deeds, D. L. (2006): Alliance type, alliance experience, and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 21, S. 430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, M. (2004): Collaborative capability in vendor-service provider relationships: Construct development and empirical analysis in the software service industry, Bamberg, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, M./ Corsten, D. (2003): Integrating perspectives: A multidimensional construct of collaborative capability, working paper, University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambe, C. J./ Spekman, R. E./ Hunt, S. D. (2002): Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 2, S.141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (1998): The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, in: Academy of Management Review, 23, 4, S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G./ Lipparini, A. (1999): The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study, in: Strategic Management Journal, 20, S. 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. K. (2002): Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: Learning-by-doing and learning myopia, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, 9, S. 847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L./ Ingram, P. (2000): Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 1, 150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draulans, J./ deMan, A.-P./ Volberda, H. W. (2003): Building alliance capability: Management techniques for superior alliance performance, in: Long Range Planning, 36, 2, S. 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe, A./ Tell, F. (2001): Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms, in: Research Policy, 30, 9, S. 1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. H./ Duysters, G. (2007): Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process, in: Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1, S. 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. H./ Duysters, G. (2007): Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process, in: Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1, S. 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M. B./ Echambadi, R./ Ford, C. (2003): Learning to collaborate: The effects of experiential and vicarious learning on alliance performance, working paper, University of Central Florida, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA. 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M. B./ Echambadi, R./ Ford, C. (2003): Learning to collaborate: The effects of experiential and vicarious learning on alliance performance, working paper, University of Central Florida, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA. 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M. (1998): Knowledge codification, process routinization, and the creation of organizational capabilities: Post-acquisition management in the US banking industry, University of Pennsylvania 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Zollo, M. (2005): Understanding partnering processes and outcomes: The contribution of evolutionary theory, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.151

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Argyres, N. S. (2004): Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry, in: Organization Science, 15, 4, S. 395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Argyres, N. S. (2004): Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry, in: Organization Science, 15, 4, S. 394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M./ Sampson, R. C. (2004): Repeated interactions & contract structure: Evidence from technology development contracts, working paper, Melbourne Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhard, B./ Mellewigt, T. (2006): Contractual functions and contractual dynamics in interfirm relationships: What we know and how to proceed, working paper No. 2006-05, University of Paderborn, presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J./ Argyres, N. S. (2004): Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry, in: Organization Science, 15, 4, S. 404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M./ Sampson, R. C. (2004): Repeated interactions & contract structure: Evidence from technology development contracts, working paper, Melbourne Business School 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Bercovitz, J./ Mayer, K. J. (2007): Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts, in: Organization Science, 18, 1, S. 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Ariño, A. (2007): Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity, in: Strategic Management Journal, 28, S. 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2003): The role of lawyers in strategic alliances, in: Case Western Law Review, 53, S. 909–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L.,/ Mayer, K. J. (2005): Building contract capabilities with standard form contracts: Selecting the content, usage, and negotiating party, working paper, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, S. 1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1997): The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40, 5, S. 1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, S. 752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T./ Deeds, D. L. (2006): Alliance type, alliance experience, and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 21, S. 451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B. N./ Khanna, T. (2000): Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21, S. 313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Zollo, M. (2005): Termination outcomes of research alliances, in: Research Policy, 34, S. 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.151

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 01-06 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.151

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.39

    Google Scholar 

  • Draulans, J./ deMan, A.-P./ Volberda, H. W. (2003): Building alliance capability: Management techniques for superior alliance performance, in: Long Range Planning, 36, 2, S. 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2002): Vertragsmanagement 2002: Eine Studie von KPMG zum Einsatz von Knowledge-Management-Systemen, Internet-Quelle: www.infonova.at/media/library_solution_km http://www.infonova.at/media/library_solution_km/VM-Studie_Druckversion.pdf, Download am 19.04.2004. 5

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2003): Contract management: control value and minimise risks, Internet-Quelle: www.iaccm.com/forum/membapwc.pdf, Download am 17.03.2004. 7

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2002): Vertragsmanagement 2002: Eine Studie von KPMG zum Einsatz von Knowledge-Management-Systemen, Internet-Quelle: www.infonova.at/media/library_solution_km http://www.infonova.at/media/library_solution_km/VM-Studie_Druckversion.pdf, Download am 19.04.2004. 6

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2003): Contract management: control value and minimise risks, Internet-Quelle: www.iaccm.com/forum/membapwc.pdf, Download am 17.03.2004. 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R./ David, P. A./ Foray, D. (2000): The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness, in: Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 2, S. 211–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, R./ Torrisi, S. (2001): Codified-tacit and general-specific knowledge in the division of labour among firms: A study of the software industry, in: Research Policy, 30, S. 1425–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe, A./ Tell, F. (2001): Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms, in: Research Policy, 30, 9, S. 1373–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Singh, H. (2004): Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capabilities in U.S. bank mergers, in: Strategic Management Journal, 25, 12, S.1233–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe, A./ Tell, F. (2001): Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms, in: Research Policy, 30, 9, S. 1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe, A./ Tell, F. (2001): Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms, in: Research Policy, 30, 9, S. 1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Singh, H. (2004): Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capabilities in U.S. bank mergers, in: Strategic Management Journal, 25, 12, S.1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, P./ Huxham, C. (2005): A little about the mystery: process learning as collaboration evolves, in: European Management Review, 2, 1, S. 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M. (1998): Knowledge codification, process routinization, and the creation of organizational capabilities: Post-acquisition management in the US banking industry, University of Pennsylvania 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B./ Zander, U. (1992): Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, in: Organization Science, 3, 3, S. 390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M. (1998): Knowledge codification, process routinization, and the creation of organizational capabilities: Post-acquisition management in the US banking industry, University of Pennsylvania. 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Zollo, M. (2005): Understanding partnering processes and outcomes: The contribution of evolutionary theory, in: Shenkar, O./ Reuer, J. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances, London, New Delhi, S. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Singh, H. (2004): Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capabilities in U.S. bank mergers, in: Strategic Management Journal, 25, 12, S.1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M./ Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, in: Organization Science, 13, 3, S. 342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991): Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, in: Organization Science, 2, 1, S. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe, A./ Tell, F. (2001): Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms, in: Research Policy, 30, 9, S. 1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krappé, K./ Kallayil, G. (2003): Contract management is more out of control than you think, in: Journal of Contract Management, April 2003, S. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2004): Contract design capabilities and contract performance by high technology firms: Implications for the roles of lawyers, managers and engineers, working paper, Boston University 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, M./ Klausner, M. (1997): Standardization and innovation in corporate contracting, in: Virginia Law Review, 83, 4, S. 720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S./ Mayer, K. J. (2006): Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives, working paper, Boston University, forthcoming in Academy of Management Review 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L.,/ Mayer, K. J. (2005): Building contract capabilities with standard form contracts: Selecting the content, usage, and negotiating party, working paper, University of Southern California 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996): Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W. M./ Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1, S.128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996): Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996): Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 17, 3, S. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999, BPS 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heussen, B. (2002): Rechtliches Risikomanagement: Wie man die Zusammenarbeit des Unternehmens mit Rechtsabteilung und Anwälten richtig organisiert, Konferenzvortrag bei Unternehmensjuristentage 2002, Frankfurt, Internet-Quelle: www.lexxion.de/mc/mc2_2002/ http://www.lexxion.de/mc/mc2_2002/Heussen_Risikomanagement.pdf, Download am 19.04.2004 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S. (2002): The role of contract in strategic alliances, in: Contractor, F./ Lorange, P. (Hrsg.): Cooperative strategies and alliances, Amsterdam, S. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.48

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994): A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, in: Organization Science, 15, 1, S.19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heussen, B. (2002): Rechtliches Risikomanagement: Wie man die Zusammenarbeit des Unternehmens mit Rechtsabteilung und Anwälten richtig organisiert, Konferenzvortrag bei Unternehmensjuristentage 2002, Frankfurt, Internet-Quelle: www.lexxion.de/mc/mc2_2002/http://www.lexxion.de/mc/mc2_2002/Heussen_Risikomanagement.pdf, Download am 19.04.2004 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W. M./ Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1, S.129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. H. (2004): Developing alliance capabilities, Eindhoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (1999): Alliance capability & success: A knowledge-based approach. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P./ Singh, H. (2005): Alliance learning capability & firm-level alliance success, working paper, University of Michigan, forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiblein, M./ Miller, D. J. (2003): An empirical examination of transaction-and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, 24, S. 847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer, J. J./ Ariño, A. (2002): Contractual renegotiations in strategic alliances, in: Journal of Management, 28, 1, S. 138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, R./ Kloyer, M. (2004): Controlling contractual exchange risks in R&D interfirm cooperation: An empirical study, in: Research Policy, 33, S. 1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimeriks, K. H./ Duysters, G. (2007): Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process, in: Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1, S. 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H./ Rothaermel, F. T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48, 2, S. 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26, S. 1009–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Erfahrung und Lernen in Vertragsbeziehungen. In: Lernen in Vertragsbeziehungen. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9984-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation