Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Kooperationskompetenz im dynamischen Wettbewerb pp 261–311Cite as

Interorganisationale Beziehungen und der Innovationsprozess

  • Chapter

  • 3007 Accesses

Abstract

“The winners of the next decade and beyond will understand how to create collaborative advantage. They will understand the key trends that continue to push firms to both focus on a narrower set of core competencies and develop closer relationships with other firms in their value chain. (...) They will develop routines for sharing knowledge with their partners in the extended enterprise (...) [a]nd they will also understand that strategy is no longer an individual firm phenomenon but will increasingly done in concert with a firm’s partners in the extended enterprise.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

o

  • Dyer, J.H. (2000): Collaborative Advantage. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Nobeoka, K. (2000): Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R.; Kletter, D. (2005): Shrinking Core, Expanding Periphery: The Relational Architecture of High-Performing Organizations. In: California Management Review 47 (3), S. 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2004): Supply Chains: A Marketing Perspective. In: New, S.; Westbrook, R. (Hrsg.): Understanding Supply Chains. New York, S. 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Kale, P.; Singh, H. (2001): How to make strategic alliances work. In: Sloan Management Review 42 (4), S. 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, H.-C.; Boldt, O.; Frunzke, H.; Gomm, M.; Hofmann, E.; Trumpfheller, M.; Sokolovsky, V. (2004): Erfolgsfaktoren der Netzkompetenz in Supply Chains. In: ai]Pfohl, H.-C. (Hrsg.): Netz-kompetenz in Supply Chains. Wiesbaden, S. 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y.L.; Hamel, G. (1991): Alliances in technology strategies. Working Paper, November 1991, INSEAD/Fontainbleau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1991): Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 12, Special Issue Summer, S. 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cason, M.; Mol, M.J. (2006): Strategic Alliances. In: Shenkar, O.; Reuer, J.J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousend Oaks, S. 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschek, S.; Rometsch, M. (2005): Netzwerktypologien — Nutzen und Grenzen am Beispiel der Kom-petenzentwicklung. In: Stahl, H.K.; von den Eichen, S.A.F. (Hrsg.): Vernetzte Unternehmen. Wirkungsvolles Agieren in Zeiten des Wandels. Berlin, S. 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, J.G.; Ketchen, D.J. (1999): Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the Resource-Based View and organizational economics. In: Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999), S. 867–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1995): Wellsprings of Knowledge. Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M.; March, J.G. (1963): A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs. Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. (2000a): Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective. In: Organization Science 11 (1), S. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. (2000b): A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. In: Journal of Management 26 (1), S. 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006): The competitive advantage of interctd firms: An extension of the Resource-Based View. In: Academy of Management Review 31(3), S. 638–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, T. (1997): The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes. In: Academy of Management Journal 40 (1997), S. 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M.; Schoonhoven, C.B. (1996): Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. In: Organization Science 7 (2), S. 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M.A. (1993): The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A Resource-Based View. In: Strategic Management Journal 14, S. 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M.; March, J.G. (1963): A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs. Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. (2000a): Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective. In: Organization Science 11 (1), S. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. (2000b): A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. In: Journal of Management 26 (1), S. 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M.; Schoonhoven, C.B. (1996): Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. In: Organization Science 7 (2), S. 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1988): Joint Ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In: Strategic Management Journal 9 (1988), S. 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M.; March, J.G. (1963): A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs. Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. (2000a): Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective. In: Organization Science 11 (1), S. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. (2000b): A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. In: Journal of Management 26 (1), S. 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A.; Tallman, S.B. (1998): Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value through In-terfirm Collaborative Relationships. In: Organization Science 9(3), S. 326–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. (2000b): A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. In: Journal of Management 26 (1), S. 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K.; Teng, B.-S. (2000b): A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. In: Journal of Management 26 (1), S. 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006): The competitive advantage of interctd firms: An extension of the Resource-Based View. In: Academy of Management Review 31(3), S. 638–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann, I. (2004): Supply Chain Management in der Automobilindustrie. Lohmar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschek, S. (1998): Kooperative Kernkompetenzen — Zum Management einzigartiger Netzwerkres-sourcen. In: Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation 67 (4), S. 230–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988): The Sources of Innovation. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey H. (1996a): Does Governance Matter? Keiretsu Alliances and Asset Specificity as Sources of Japanese Competitive Advantage. In: Organization Science 7 (6), S. 649–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. (1996b): Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry. In: Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996), S. 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. (1996c): How Chrysler created an American Keiretsu. In: Harvard Business Review 4/1996, S. 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. (1996b): Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry. In: Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996), S. 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. (1996b): Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry. In: Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996), S. 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschek, S. (1998): Kooperative Kernkompetenzen — Zum Management einzigartiger Netzwerkres-sourcen. In: Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation 67 (4), S. 230–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffrey H. (1996a): Does Governance Matter? Keiretsu Alliances and Asset Specificity as Sources of Japanese Competitive Advantage. In: Organization Science 7 (6), S. 649–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. (1996b): Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry. In: Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996), S. 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. (1996c): How Chrysler created an American Keiretsu. In: Harvard Business Review 4/1996, S. 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (2000): The network as knowledge: Generative rules and emergence of structure. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (Special Issue March 2000), S. 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger, U. (2000): Kompetenzentwicklung in Produktionsnetzwerken — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. In: Hammann, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006): The competitive advantage of interctd firms: An extension of the Resource-Based View. In: Academy of Management Review 31(3), S. 638–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006): The competitive advantage of interctd firms: An extension of the Resource-Based View. In: Academy of Management Review 31(3), S. 638–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006): The competitive advantage of interctd firms: An extension of the Resource-Based View. In: Academy of Management Review 31(3), S. 638–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frunzke, H. (2004): Von der Kompetenz im strategischen Management zur Netzkompetenz. In: Pfohl, H.C. (Hrsg.): Netzkompetenz in Supply Chains. Grundlagen und Umsetzung. Wiesbaden, S. 15–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, H.-C.; Boldt, O.; Frunzke, H.; Gomm, M.; Hofmann, E.; Trumpfheller, M.; Sokolovsky, V. (2004): Erfolgsfaktoren der Netzkompetenz in Supply Chains. In: ai]Pfohl, H.-C. (Hrsg.): Netz-kompetenz in Supply Chains. Wiesbaden, S. 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M.A.; Gudergan, S.P. (2006): Learning and Knowledge Development in Alliances. In: Shenkar, O.; Reuer, J.J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousend Oaks, S. 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y.L.; Hamel, G. (1998): Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through Partnering. Boston/MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P.; Singh, H.; Perlmutter, H. (2000): Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles, M.A.; Gudergan, S.P. (2006): Learning and Knowledge Development in Alliances. In: Shenkar, O.; Reuer, J.J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousend Oaks, S. 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M.M.; Inkpen, A.C. (1995): The subtle art of learning through alliances. In: Business Quarterly 60 (2), S. 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. (1999): Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999), S. 595–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (1997): Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. In: Organization Studies 18(6), S. 973–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (1997): Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. In: Organization Studies 18(6), S. 973–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. (1999): Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999), S. 595–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1996): Prospering in Dynamically-Competitve Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. In: Organization Science 7, S. 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (1997): Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. In: Organization Studies 18(6), S. 973–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosakowski, E. (1997): Strategy making under causal ambiguity: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. In: Organization Science 8 (4), S. 414–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosakowski, E.; McKelcey, B. (1997): Predicting Rent Generation in Competence-based Competition. In: Sanchez, R.; Heene, A. (Hrsg.): Competence-based Strategic Management., S. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C. (2005): Learning through Alliances: General Motors and NUMMI. In: California Management Review 47(4), S. 114–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. (1999): Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999), S. 595–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (1997): Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. In: Organization Studies 18(6), S. 973–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B.N.; Khanna, T. (2000): Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R.; Ahuja, G. (2002): Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. In: Academy of Management Journal 45(6), S. 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M.; Swan, K.S. (1995): The role of strategic alliances in high-technology new product development. In: Strategic Management Journal 16 (1995), S. 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1999): Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation. In: Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999), S. 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P.; Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (2002): Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. In: Strategic Management Journal 23 (2002), S. 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. (1999): Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999), S. 595–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W.; Koput, K.W.; Smith-Doerr, L. (1996): Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1996), S. 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, B.N.; Khanna, T. (2000): Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.C. (2005): Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 26 (2005), S. 1009–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerzen, A. (2007): Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. In: Strategic Management Journal 28 (2007), S. 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H.; Rothaermel, F.T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. In: Academy of Management Journal 48(2), S. 332–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H.; Rothaermel, F.T. (2005): The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. In: Academy of Management Journal 48(2), S. 332–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helleloid, D.; Simonin, B. (1997): Organizational Learning and the Firm’s Core Competence. In: Sanchez, R.; Heene, A. (Hrsg.): Competence-based Competition. 3. Aufl., Chichester, S. 213–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. (1997): The Importance of Collaborative Know-how: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization. In: Academy of Management Journal 40(5), S. 1150–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D.A.; March, J.G. (1993): The myopia of learning. In: Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993), S. 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capasso, A.; Meglio, O. (2005): Knowledge transfer in mergers and acquisitions: how frequent acquirers learn to manage the integration process. In: Capasso, A.; Dagnino, G.B.; Lanza, A. (Hrsg.): Strategic Capabilities and Knowledge Transfer Within and Between Organizations. Cheltenham/UK, S.199–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D.; Levinthal, D.A. (1989): Information and learning: The two faces of R&D. in: Economic Journal 99 (1989), S. 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D.; Levinthal, D.A. (1989): Information and learning: The two faces of R&D. in: Economic Journal 99 (1989), S. 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J.; Koka, B.R.; Pathak, S. (2006): The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. In: Academy of Management Journal 31(4), S. 833–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D.; Levinthal, D A. (1990): Absoptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. In: Adminsitrative Sience Quarterly 35 (1990), S. 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J.; ai]Lubatkin, M. (1998): Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning. In: Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998), S. 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (1997): Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. In: Organization Studies 18(6), S. 973–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J.; ai]Lubatkin, M. (1998): Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning. In: Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998), S. 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D.; Levinthal, D A. (1990): Absoptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. In: Adminsitrative Sience Quarterly 35 (1990), S. 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J.; ai]Lubatkin, M. (1998): Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning. In: Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998), S. 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A.; George, G.(2002): Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. In: Academy of Management Review 27 (2002), S. 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M.; Florin, J.; Lane, P. (2001): Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning. In: Human Relations 54(10), S. 1353–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M.; Florin, J.; Lane, P. (2001): Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning. In: Human Relations 54(10), S. 1353–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M.; Florin, J.; Lane, P. (2001): Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning. In: Human Relations 54(10), S. 1353–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, K. (2006): Unternehmensnetzwerke und Erfolg — Eine empirische Analyse der Einfluss-und Gestaltungsfaktoren. In: Zeitschrift für die betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 58 (12), S. 1051–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J.; Koka, B.R.; Pathak, S. (2006): The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. In: Academy of Management Journal 31(4), S. 833–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D.; Levinthal, D A. (1990): Absoptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. In: Adminsitrative Sience Quarterly 35 (1990), S. 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Nobeoka, K. (2000): Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.D.; Prusak, L. (2001): In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston/MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyler, M.; Coff, R.W. (2003): Research Notes and Commentaries: Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties that Split Pies. In: Strategic Management Journal 24 (2003), S. 677–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A.; Harris, J. (2006): Interorganizational Trust. In: Shenkar, O.; Reuer, J.J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousend Oaks, S. 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1996): Trust, Opportunism and Governance: A Process and Control Model. In: Organization Studies 17 (6), S. 985–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Chu, W. (1998): The determinants and economic outcomes of trust and supplier-buyer relationships. Working Paper, gefunden im Internet unter http://imvp.mit.edu/papers/98/186a.pdf, gefunden am 25.10.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Cho, D.S.; Chu, W. (1998): Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next “Best Practice” in Supply Chain Management. In: California Management Review (40), Winter, S. 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, R. (2001): Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. In: Organization Studies 22 (2001), S. 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1974): The Limits of Organization. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A.; Harris, J. (2006): Interorganizational Trust. In: Shenkar, O.; Reuer, J.J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousend Oaks, S. 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A.; Venkatraman, N. (1995): Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. In: Strategic Management Journal 16 (1995), S. 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Chu, W. (1998): The determinants and economic outcomes of trust and supplier-buyer relationships. Working Paper, gefunden im Internet unter http://imvp.mit.edu/papers/98/186a.pdf, gefunden am 25.10.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Cho, D.S.; Chu, W. (1998): Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next “Best Practice” in Supply Chain Management. In: California Management Review (40), Winter, S. 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A.; Harris, J. (2006): Interorganizational Trust. In: Shenkar, O.; Reuer, J.J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousend Oaks, S. 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A.; Harris, J. (2006): Interorganizational Trust. In: Shenkar, O.; Reuer, J.J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousend Oaks, S. 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. (1997): Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. In: Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), S. 535–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosakowski, E. (1997): Strategy making under causal ambiguity: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. In: Organization Science 8 (4), S. 414–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosakowski, E.; McKelcey, B. (1997): Predicting Rent Generation in Competence-based Competition. In: Sanchez, R.; Heene, A. (Hrsg.): Competence-based Strategic Management., S. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. (1997): Does trust improve business performance? Working Paper C-0175a, London School of Economics and Political Science. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Chu, W. (1998): The determinants and economic outcomes of trust and supplier-buyer relationships. Working Paper, gefunden im Internet unter http://imvp.mit.edu/papers/98/186a.pdf, gefunden am 25.10.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Cho, D.S.; Chu, W. (1998): Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next “Best Practice” in Supply Chain Management. In: California Management Review (40), Winter, S. 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A.; Harris, J. (2006): Interorganizational Trust. In: Shenkar, O.; Reuer, J.J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousend Oaks, S. 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y.L.; Hamel, G. (1991): Alliances in technology strategies. Working Paper, November 1991, INSEAD/Fontainbleau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1991): Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 12, Special Issue Summer, S. 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P.; Singh, H.; Perlmutter, H. (2000): Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage. In: Academy of Management Review 23 (4), S. 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T.; Gulati, R.; Nohria, N. (1998): The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. In: Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998), S. 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C. (2000): A Note on the Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 775–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C. (2000): A Note on the Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 775–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C. (2005): Learning through Alliances: General Motors and NUMMI. In: California Management Review 47(4), S. 114–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Nobeoka, K. (2000): Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. In: Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000), S. 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T.; Gmünden, H.-G. (2000): Technologie, Unternehmen, Netzwerk: Die Wirkung von Technologie-und Netzwerk-Kompetenz auf den Innovationserfolg und seine Voraussetzungen. In: Hamman, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 337–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T. (1998): Innovationserfolg durch Netzwerk-Kompetenz: Effektives Management von Unter-nehmensnetzwerken. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T.; Gmünden, H.-G. (1998): Die netzwerkende Unternehmung: Organisationale Voraussetzungen netzwerk-kompetenter Unternehmen. In: Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation 67 (5), S. 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T. (1998): Innovationserfolg durch Netzwerk-Kompetenz: Effektives Management von Unter-nehmensnetzwerken. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T.; Gmünden, H.-G. (1998): Die netzwerkende Unternehmung: Organisationale Voraussetzungen netzwerk-kompetenter Unternehmen. In: Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation 67 (5), S. 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelingmeyer, J.; Specht, G. (2000): Wissensorientierte Kooperationskompetenz. In: Hamman, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 313–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T. (1998): Innovationserfolg durch Netzwerk-Kompetenz: Effektives Management von Unter-nehmensnetzwerken. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T.; Gmünden, H.-G. (1998): Die netzwerkende Unternehmung: Organisationale Voraussetzungen netzwerk-kompetenter Unternehmen. In: Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation 67 (5), S. 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillig, A. (1997): Die Kooperation als Lernarena in Prozessen fundamentalen Wandels — Ein Ansatz zum Management von Kooperationskompetenz. Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillig, A. (1997): Die Kooperation als Lernarena in Prozessen fundamentalen Wandels — Ein Ansatz zum Management von Kooperationskompetenz. Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillig, A. (1997): Die Kooperation als Lernarena in Prozessen fundamentalen Wandels — Ein Ansatz zum Management von Kooperationskompetenz. Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillig, A. (1997): Die Kooperation als Lernarena in Prozessen fundamentalen Wandels — Ein Ansatz zum Management von Kooperationskompetenz. Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggers, B. (1998): Value System Design — Unternehmenswertsteigerung durch strategische Unter-nehmensnetzwerke. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, B.B. (2001): The complementarity of kooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective. In: Journal of Technology Management 18 (2001), S. 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T.; Gmünden, H.-G. (2000): Technologie, Unternehmen, Netzwerk: Die Wirkung von Technologie-und Netzwerk-Kompetenz auf den Innovationserfolg und seine Voraussetzungen. In: Hamman, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 337–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. (1997): The Importance of Collaborative Know-how: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization. In: Academy of Management Journal 40(5), S. 1150–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L. (1999): Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances. In: Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999), S. 595–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (1997): Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. In: Organization Studies 18(6), S. 973–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, B.B. (2001): The complementarity of kooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective. In: Journal of Technology Management 18 (2001), S. 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger, U. (2000): Kompetenzentwicklung in Produktionsnetzwerken — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. In: Hammann, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J.; Koka, B.R.; Pathak, S. (2006): The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. In: Academy of Management Journal 31(4), S. 833–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger, U. (2000): Kompetenzentwicklung in Produktionsnetzwerken — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. In: Hammann, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger, U. (2000): Kompetenzentwicklung in Produktionsnetzwerken — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. In: Hammann, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger, U. (2000): Kompetenzentwicklung in Produktionsnetzwerken — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. In: Hammann, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mildenberger, U. (2000): Kompetenzentwicklung in Produktionsnetzwerken — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. In: Hammann, P.; Freiling, J. (Hrsg.): Die Ressourcen-und Kompetenzperspektive des Strategischen Managements. Wiesbaden, S. 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoncini, R.; Montresor, S.; Vertova, G. (2003): Dynamic capabilities: evolving organizations in evolving (technological) systems. Quaderni di ricera del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche “Hyman P. Minsky” 4/2003, Universita’ Degli Studi Di Bergamo, Bergamo. Levin, P.; Phelan, S.E. (2002): Rent and resources: a market process perspective. In: Foss, N.J.; Klein, P.G. (Hrsg.): Entrepreneurship and the Firm. Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization. Cheltenham/UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Interorganisationale Beziehungen und der Innovationsprozess. In: Kooperationskompetenz im dynamischen Wettbewerb. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9940-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation