Advertisement

Abstract

This chapter exposits the results of the empirical research. Firstly, the results of the initial case studies are presented including a detailed description of the case study partners and the interviewees. In addition, cross-case conclusions are derived. The second part is dedicated to the survey research results. Sample generation and data collection are described. The findings of the survey research are evaluated by the use of descriptive evaluations and various statistical analysis methods. The goal is to submit our research propositions to rigorous empirical analysis and evaluate the results thus obtained.

Keywords

Innovation Performance Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Technology Perspective Performance Perspective Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 576.
    For details about the informant bias, see Ernst (2001), pp. 408 ff.Google Scholar
  2. 587.
    See e.g. Steinmann/ Schreyögg (1997), pp. 389 ff.Google Scholar
  3. 588.
    See Diekmann (2001), pp. 359 ff.Google Scholar
  4. 589.
    See Greene (1997), pp. 873 ff.Google Scholar
  5. 590.
    See Schmidt (1994), pp. 201 ff. and Altmann (2002), p. 100Google Scholar
  6. 592.
    This corresponds to the results of Amabile et. al. (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 593.
    For similar results see e.g. Cooper/ Kleinschmidt (1996), Amabile et. al. (1996) and Balachandra et. al. (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 594.
    For similar results see e.g. Ebadi/ Utterback (1984) and Gemünden/Lechler (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 595.
    For similar results see e.g. Cooper/ Kleinschmidt (1996), Song et. al. (1997), Griffin (1997a), Griffin (1997b) and Song/Parry (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 597.
    For similar results see e.g. Griffin (1997a) and Song/Parry (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 598.
    For similar results see e.g. Song et al. (1997) and Griffin (1997a)Google Scholar
  12. 599.
    For similar results see Balachandra et al. (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 603.
    See Bühl/ Zöfel (2005), pp. 180 f.Google Scholar
  14. 604.
    See Bühl/ Zöfel (2005), p. 455 ff.Google Scholar
  15. 605.
    See Bühl/ Zöfel (2005), p. 457Google Scholar
  16. 607.
    See Haenecke (2002), p. 171Google Scholar
  17. 609.
    See Bryman/ Cramer (2003), p. 244. They propose that Spearman’s rho should not exceed 0.8. Variables might then be eliminated in further regression analysesGoogle Scholar
  18. 611.
    For details on stepwise multiple linear regressions see Section 4.2.6.5. The F ratio test allows the researcher to test the null hypothesis that the multiple correlation is zero in the population from which the sample was taken, see Bryman/ Cramer (2003), p. 247Google Scholar
  19. 613.
    See again Bryman/ Cramer (2003), p. 244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2008

Personalised recommendations