Abstract
It is a well-known fact that innovation is important for companies. It has been proven in economic theory and business science that innovation both fuels and is necessary for long-term growth and value generation.1 Sustained innovation serves as a differentiation strategy to sustain performance in competitive markets where innovative solutions are copied too easily and frequently.2 The conventional approach to innovation is that it builds a defensible position within an existing industry.3 A new strategic logic to innovation developed by Kim and Mauborgne is to focus on making the competition irrelevant by creating a leap in value for buyers and the company.4 Such practice opens up new and uncontested market spaces. By creating so-called value innovation, a company executes its strategy in a new way, resulting in an uncontested ‘blue ocean’, which breaks away from the competition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See Schumpeter (1931), p. 100 and Doyle (1998), p. 22
See Porter (1985) and Cottam et. al. (2001), p. 88
See Drucker (1985), pp. 76 ff.
See Kim/ Mauborgne (2005a), p. 24 and Kim/Mauborgne (2005b), pp. 12 ff.
See Porter (1998), p. 6
See Klingebiel (2001), p. 5
See Low/ Siesfeld (1998), pp. 24 ff.
See Tichy/ DeRose (2006), p. 31
See Goldenberg et al. (2001), p. 78
See Hauber (2002), p. 26
See Crux/ Schwilling (2003)
See Anthony/ Govindarajan (2001), p. 6
See Bredrup (1995), p. 77 and Klingebiel (1997), p. 658
See Schilling/ Hill (1998), pp. 67 ff. and Dankbaar (2003), p. xviii
See Kim/ Mauborgne (1997), p. 65 and Kim/Mauborgne (1998), pp. 323 f.
See Dunham/ Pierce (1989), pp. 7 ff. and Kim/Mauborgne (1997), p. 3
See Wu et al. (2007) for an overview
See Fehr/ Fischbacher (2003), pp. 785 ff.
See Kim/ Mauborgne (1997), p. 4
see Van der Heyden et. al. (2005), pp. 3 ff.
See Kim/ Mauborgne (1997), p. 4 and Kim/Mauborgne (1999), pp. 44 f.
See Brockner (2006), pp. 126 ff.
see Van der Heyden/Limberg (2007), p. 101
See Kim/Mauborgne (1997), pp. 65 ff.
See Montoya-Weiss/Calantone (1994), Balachandra/Friar (1997), Henard/Szymanski (2001), van der Panne et. al. (2003), pp. 309 ff. and Hauschildt (2004), pp. 33 ff. For a general criticism on research about success factors see Nicolai/Kieser (2002), pp. 579 ff. who initiated a debate amongst various academics about the logic of this research
See Hauschildt (2004), p. 36
See Section 2.1.1 and e.g. Krieger (2005) for the specific environmental variables for radical innovations
See Hauschildt (2004), pp. 35 ff.
See Ulrich (1970), pp. 105 ff. and Malik (1992), pp. 51 ff.. For further explanations concerning the term ‘cybernetics’ see Section 2.2.2.1
See Wu et. al. (2007)
See Jensen/ Meckling (1976), pp. 310 ff.
See Wu et. al. (2007)
See Eisenhardt (1989), pp. 57 ff.
See Günther (1997), pp. 48 f. ‘Hidden action’ describes the situation where the agent disposes of discrete areas since the principal cannot fully observe the agent’s actions. ‘Hidden information’ is existent if the principal is able to observe the actions, but can not evaluate their quality. See e.g. Gleich (2001), pp. 32 f.
See Kaplan (1998), p. 89, Yin (1994), p. 21 and Section 4.2.1
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Introduction. In: Examining Innovation Management from a Fair Process Perspective. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9837-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9837-8_1
Publisher Name: Gabler
Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-1070-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-9837-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)