Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 504 Accesses

Abstract

It is a well-known fact that innovation is important for companies. It has been proven in economic theory and business science that innovation both fuels and is necessary for long-term growth and value generation.1 Sustained innovation serves as a differentiation strategy to sustain performance in competitive markets where innovative solutions are copied too easily and frequently.2 The conventional approach to innovation is that it builds a defensible position within an existing industry.3 A new strategic logic to innovation developed by Kim and Mauborgne is to focus on making the competition irrelevant by creating a leap in value for buyers and the company.4 Such practice opens up new and uncontested market spaces. By creating so-called value innovation, a company executes its strategy in a new way, resulting in an uncontested ‘blue ocean’, which breaks away from the competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Schumpeter (1931), p. 100 and Doyle (1998), p. 22

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Porter (1985) and Cottam et. al. (2001), p. 88

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Drucker (1985), pp. 76 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Kim/ Mauborgne (2005a), p. 24 and Kim/Mauborgne (2005b), pp. 12 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Porter (1998), p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Klingebiel (2001), p. 5

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Low/ Siesfeld (1998), pp. 24 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Tichy/ DeRose (2006), p. 31

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Goldenberg et al. (2001), p. 78

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Hauber (2002), p. 26

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Crux/ Schwilling (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Anthony/ Govindarajan (2001), p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Bredrup (1995), p. 77 and Klingebiel (1997), p. 658

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Schilling/ Hill (1998), pp. 67 ff. and Dankbaar (2003), p. xviii

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Kim/ Mauborgne (1997), p. 65 and Kim/Mauborgne (1998), pp. 323 f.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Dunham/ Pierce (1989), pp. 7 ff. and Kim/Mauborgne (1997), p. 3

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Wu et al. (2007) for an overview

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Fehr/ Fischbacher (2003), pp. 785 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Kim/ Mauborgne (1997), p. 4

    Google Scholar 

  20. see Van der Heyden et. al. (2005), pp. 3 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Kim/ Mauborgne (1997), p. 4 and Kim/Mauborgne (1999), pp. 44 f.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Brockner (2006), pp. 126 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  23. see Van der Heyden/Limberg (2007), p. 101

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Kim/Mauborgne (1997), pp. 65 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Montoya-Weiss/Calantone (1994), Balachandra/Friar (1997), Henard/Szymanski (2001), van der Panne et. al. (2003), pp. 309 ff. and Hauschildt (2004), pp. 33 ff. For a general criticism on research about success factors see Nicolai/Kieser (2002), pp. 579 ff. who initiated a debate amongst various academics about the logic of this research

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Hauschildt (2004), p. 36

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Section 2.1.1 and e.g. Krieger (2005) for the specific environmental variables for radical innovations

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Hauschildt (2004), pp. 35 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Ulrich (1970), pp. 105 ff. and Malik (1992), pp. 51 ff.. For further explanations concerning the term ‘cybernetics’ see Section 2.2.2.1

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Wu et. al. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Jensen/ Meckling (1976), pp. 310 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Wu et. al. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Eisenhardt (1989), pp. 57 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Günther (1997), pp. 48 f. ‘Hidden action’ describes the situation where the agent disposes of discrete areas since the principal cannot fully observe the agent’s actions. ‘Hidden information’ is existent if the principal is able to observe the actions, but can not evaluate their quality. See e.g. Gleich (2001), pp. 32 f.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See Kaplan (1998), p. 89, Yin (1994), p. 21 and Section 4.2.1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Introduction. In: Examining Innovation Management from a Fair Process Perspective. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9837-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics