Skip to main content
  • 752 Accesses

Abstract

The introductory chapter of this dissertation outlined the continuously heated debate of whether RBT can in fact be considered a theory, with critics basically questioning the empirical testability of RBT. Throughout this dissertation, it became obvious that RBT is — and has been — empirically testable. To make this argument, I addressed and cleared each of the three main research deficits of RBT in this respect: (1) the lack of understanding towards RBT’s central empirically testable propositions; (2) the lack of understanding towards the empirical validation of RBT, i.e., no thorough efforts towards the accumulation and integration of research findings; and (3) the lack of systematically addressing the methodological problems, and evaluating a broader basis of more suitable methods. In the following, I will conclude on the main findings, while also outlining implications for RBT. In addition, I will discuss the dissertation’s limitations as well as provide a future research agenda for resource-based research, both theoretically and empirically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf. Mannor/ Shamsie (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. Knott et al. (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Brush/ Artz (1999); Carmeli (2004); Miller/Shamsie (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Barney/ Arikan (2001), p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Berthel (2000), p. 131. While the former identifies current abilities of a person, the latter inquires potential abilities of a person. For instance, achievement or attainment tests evaluate the person’s current level of knowledge and ability, which has been reached after a certain period of experience or training, e.g., to ensure that a particular standard has been reached. Furthermore, aptitude tests measure a person’s ability level regardless of previous experience, and inform about the person’s capacity to learn new skills. Generally, these tests may be divided into those assessing a collection of traits and those focusing on more specific abilities and thus explore the impact of more structured HR capabilities on performance. Cf. Searle (2003), p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Conclusion and Future Research Agenda. In: Empirical Research within Resource-Based Theory. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9830-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics