Abstract
Chapter 6. 1. serves to put the propositions derived from the empirical study in the overall context of the research questions set out in the beginning. With regard to this, 6. 1. also sets forth important limitations of the study, both conceptually and methodically. Finally, in chapter 6. 2., central implications for research and practice will be suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
However, financier screening may become more and more standardized and rule-like, for example in bank lending based on sector-wide credit scoring of small businesses’ loan applications (cf. Berger & Frame, 2007 for the US case) or in credit rating based on financial regulation in the context of the Basel II Accord (cf. 4. 2. above).
E.g. possible framing effects in perceived financier feedback relative to the existing financing situation of the entrepreneur; here, concepts from behavioural finance may be useful — cf., for example, Kahneman et al. (1984).
Cf. Ruef and Scott (1998) again for the domain-specific character of organizational legitimizing.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Conclusions and implications for research and practice. In: The Evolution of Entrepreneurs’ Fund-Raising Intentions. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9797-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9797-5_6
Publisher Name: Gabler
Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-1071-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-9797-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)