Skip to main content

To own or not to own! A property rights perspective on services in technology licensing

  • Chapter
Neue Herausforderungen an das Dienstleistungsmarketing

Abstract

Ownership and contractual aspects of services have caught the attention of service research early on (e.g. Judd 1964, Regan 1963) but were not addressed by consistent research programs. In recent years a growing range of researchers is coming to terms with property rights related aspects of service research. (2004) even suggested a non-ownership perspective as a consistent framework for highlighting the peculiar management challenges of services in contrast to goods as well as a way to pay duty to the wide spectrum of phenomena approached from a service perspective. A lot of contradictions resulting from the intangibility, inseparability, heterogeneity and perishability framework could be resolved. E.g. non-ownership concepts can be used to highlight services that are relying on the use of physical assets as e.g. car rental or machine-leasing services in a consistent manner. There, services are a way to provide benefits to users without requiring them to own the underlying assets. Goods would be characterized by the transfer of ownership that asigns all remaining responsibilities to the customers. Thus, a common ground of property rights approaches and services seems to stem from the make-or-buy considerations implied by many economic decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, et al. (2001). Markets for technology the economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, Mass. u.a., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. “Marketing as Exchange.” Journal of Marketing 39(4): 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. “The Capture of Wealth by Monopolists and the Protection of Property Rights.” International Review of Law&Economics 14(4): 393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. “The Entrepreneur’s, Reward for Self-Policing.” Economic Inquiry 25(1): 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge ≪u.a.≫, Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, W. (2000). “Private-Property Rights, Erroneous Interpretations, Morality and Economics: Reply to Demsetz.” Quarterly Journal Of Austrian Economics, 3 (Spring 2000): 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, B. f. B. u. (2004). Bundesbericht Forschung 2004. Berlin, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2004). Open innovation-the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Mass., Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W., Ed. (2006). Open innovation — researching a new paradigm. Oxford u.a., Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law&Economics III (October 1960): 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. and R. S. Pindyck “The Options Approach to Capital Investment.” Harvard Business Review 73(3): 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, E. G. and S. Pejovich “Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature.” Journal of Economic Literature 10(4): 1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, M. a. J., George (1999). “Governance Value Analysis and Marketing Strategy.” Journal of Marketing Vol. 63, (Special Issue 1999)): 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. J. and O. D. Hart “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” Journal of Political Economy 94(4): 691–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. and J. Moore “Property rights and the nature of the firm.” Journal of Political Economy 98(6): 1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, S. I. (1999). “Towards an Austrian Perspective on the Firm.” Review of Austrian Economics, 11(1999): 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, R. C. (1964). “The Case for Redefining Services.” Journal of Marketing 28(1): 58–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1997). “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach.” Journal of Economic Literature XXXV (March 1997): 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., A. Sahay, et al. “Emerging role of technology licensing in the development.” Journal of Marketing 60(1): 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, P. (1999). Capital in Disequilibrium. The Role of Capital in a Changing World. London and New York (Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C. and E. Gummesson “Whither Services Marketing?: In Search of a New Paradigm and Fresh Perspectives.” Journal of Service Research 7(1): 20–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I. C. P., Alexander B. van/ Mcgrath, Rita Gunther/ Thompson, James D. (2006). “Using Real Options Discipline For Highly, Uncertain Technology Investments.” Research Technology Management 2006(January–February): 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, D. (2005). The Qualcomm Equation. How a fledgling telecom company forged a new path to big profits and market dominance. New York et al., American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1993). “Research note: an analysis of specifity in transaction cost economics.” Organization Studies Vol. 14,(No.3): 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, G. P. R., Mario J. (1996). The Economics of Time and Ignorance. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Directorate for Science, T. a. I., O Valuation and Exploitation of Intellectual Property. STI WORKING PAPER 2006/5. Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P. (2006). Science Business. The Promise, the Reality, And the Future of Biotech. Boston/Mass-. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. “Strategic Outsourcing: Leveraging Knowledge Capabilities.” MIT Sloan Management Review 40(4): 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. “Outsourcing Innovation: The New Engine of Growth.” MIT Sloan Management Review 41(4): 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1992). Intelligent enterprise — a knowledge and service based paradigm for industry. New York ≪u.a.≫, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, W. J. “The Service Revolution.” Journal of Marketing 27(3): 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2000). The Age of Access. The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, where all life is a Paid for Experience. New York City, Penguin Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautet, F. (2000). An Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Martin Benkenstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ehret, M. (2008). To own or not to own! A property rights perspective on services in technology licensing. In: Benkenstein, M. (eds) Neue Herausforderungen an das Dienstleistungsmarketing. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9697-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics