Partial Little Square Product Development Product Innovation Management Journal Strategic Management Journal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aaker, D.A./ Jacobson, R. (1994): The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(May), 191–201.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J.S. (1965): Inequity in social exchange, in: Bernkovitz, L. (ed.): Advance in experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, New York, 267–299.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, P.S. (1995): Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design / Manufacturing Interface, Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 2 (March–April 1995), 147–167.Google Scholar
  4. Aldrich, H./ Herker, D. (1977): Boundary Spanning Roles and Organization Structure, Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, T.J. (1986): Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. Allison, P.D. (1999): Multiple Regression — A primer, Thousand Oaks, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. Alper, S./ Tjosvold, D./ Law, K.S. (1998): Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams, Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, Vol. 74, No. 1, April, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amabile, T.M. (1988): A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, 123–167.Google Scholar
  9. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context, Boulder,(1996).Google Scholar
  10. Amabile, T.M./ Hennessey, B.A./ Grossman, B.S. (1986): Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Amabile, T.M./ Hill, K.G./ Hennessey, B.A./ Tighe, E.M. (1994): The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Amason, A. C. (1996): Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management groups, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ancona, D.G. (1990): Outward Bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2, 334–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ancona, D.G./ Caldwell, D. (1990): Improving the performance of new product teams, Research Technology Management, March–April, 25–34.Google Scholar
  15. Ancona, D.G./ Caldwell, D. (1992a): Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, Dec’ 92, Vol. 37,4, 634–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ancona, D.G./ Caldwell, D. (1992b): Demography and Design, Predictors of New Product Development Performance, Organization Science, 3, 321–341.Google Scholar
  17. Andrews, J./ Smith, D.C. (1996): In Search of Marketing Imagination: Factors Affecting the Creativity of Marketing Programs for Mature Products, Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (May, 174–187.Google Scholar
  18. Argyres, N.S./ Silverman, B.S (2004): R&D, Organization Structure, And The Development of Corporate Technological Knowledge, Strategic Management Journal, 25(2004), 929–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ashforth, B./ Mael, F. (1989): Social Identity Theory and the Organization, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005): Resolving the Capability Rigidity Paradoxon in Product Innovation, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69 (October 2005), 61–83.Google Scholar
  21. Atuahene-Gima, K./ Slater, S.F./ Olson, E.M. (2005): The Contingent Value of Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations for New Product Program Performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ayers, D./ Dahlstrom, R./ Skinner, S.J. (1997): An Exploratory Investigation of Organizational Antecedents to New Product Success, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXXIV (February 1997), 107–116.Google Scholar
  23. Ayers, D.J./ Gordon, G.L./ Schoenbachler, D.D. (2001): Integration And New Product Development Success: The Role of Formal and Informal Controls, The Journal of Applied Business Research, 17 (2001), 2, 133–148.Google Scholar
  24. Backhaus, K./ Erichson, B./ Plinke, W./ Weiber, R. (2000): Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, Berlin, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. Baer, M./ Oldham, G.R./ Cummings, A. (2003): Rewarding creativity: when does it really matter?, The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bagozzi, R./ Yi, Y. (1988): On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 74–94.Google Scholar
  27. Bahli, B.; Büyükkurt, M.D. (2005): Group Performance in Information Systems Project Groups: An Empirical Study, Journal of Information Technology Education, Vol. 4, 97–113.Google Scholar
  28. Baron, R.A./ Byrne, D. (1997): Social Psychology, Boston (1997).Google Scholar
  29. Bassett-Jones, N. (2005): The Paradox of Diversity Management, Creativity and Innovation, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Belsley, D..A., Kuh, E./ Welsch, R.E. (1980): Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  31. Benamati, J./ Lederer, A.L. (2000): Rapid Change: Nine Information Technology Management Challenges, INFOR, Vol. 38, No. 4 (Nov), 336–358.Google Scholar
  32. Bentler, P.M./ Chou, C.P. (1987): Practical issues in structural modeling, Sociological Methods and Research, 16(1), 78–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Berghman, L. (2006): Strategic Innovation Capacity — A Mixed Method Study on Deliberate Strategic Learning Mechanisms, ERIM Ph.D Series Research in Management, 87, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, online available under: <> (10. Dec. 2006).
  34. Bhuiyan, N./ Thomson, V./ Gerwin, D. (2006): Implementing concurrent engineering, Research Technology Management, Vol. 49(1), p. 38–43.Google Scholar
  35. Birkinshaw, J./ Fey, C.F. (2000): Organizing for Innovation in large firms, Working Paper, London Business School & Stockholm School of Economic, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration, No. 2000:5, April 2000, 1–23.Google Scholar
  36. Bonner, J.M./ Ruekert, R.W./ Walker, O.C. (2002): Upper management control of new product development projects and project performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 233–245.Google Scholar
  37. Bonner, J.M. (2005): The influence of formal controls on customer interactivity in new product development, Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Bookstein, F.L. (1986): The elements of latent variable models: A cautionary lecture, In: Lamb, M./ Brown, A./ Rogoff, B. (Eds.): Advances in developmental psychology, Hillsdale, 203–230.Google Scholar
  39. Boomsma, A./ Hoogland, J.J. (2001): The Robustness of LISREL Modeling Revisited, In: Cudeck, R./ du Toit, S./ Sörbom, D. (eds.): Structural equation models: Present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog, Chicago, 139–168.Google Scholar
  40. Burns, T./ Stalker, G.M. (1961): The management of innovation. London (1961).Google Scholar
  41. Calder, B.J./ Staw, B.M. (1975): The Self-Perception of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Campion, M.A./ Papper, E.M./ Medsker, G.J. (1996): Relations Between Work Team Characteristics And Effectiveness: A Replication And Extension, Personnel Psychology, Summer 96, Vol. 49, Issue 2, 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Carmines, E.G./ Zeller, R.A. (1979): Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, N. 07–017, Beverly Hills (1979).Google Scholar
  44. Chen, G./ Tjosvold, D. (2002): Cooperative Goals and Constructive Controversy for Promoting Innovation in Student Groups in China, Journal of Education for Business, September/October (2002), 46–50.Google Scholar
  45. Chen, G./ Liu, C./ Tjosvold, D. (2005): Conflict Management for Effective Top Management Teams and Innovation in China, Journal of Management Studies, 42,2 (March), 277–300.Google Scholar
  46. Child, J. (1972): Organization structure, environment, and performance — The role of strategic choice, Sociology, 6, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Chin, W.W. (1998): The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modelling, in: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) (1998): Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 295–336.Google Scholar
  48. Chin, W.W./ Newsted, P.R. (1999): Structural Equation Modelling Analysis with Small Sample Sizes Using Partial Least Squares, in: Hoyle, R.H. (ed.): Strategies for Small Sample Research, Thousand Oaks, 307–341.Google Scholar
  49. Churchill, G.A. (1979): A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1): 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Clark, K.B./ Fujimoto, T. (1991): Product Development Performance, Boston (1991).Google Scholar
  51. Clark, K.B./ Wheelwright, S.C. (1992): Organizing and Leading “Heavyweight” Development Teams, California Management Review, Spring, 9–28.Google Scholar
  52. Cohen, S.G./ Bailey, D.E. (1997): What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suit, Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Cooper, R.G. (1995): Developing new products on time, in time, Research Technology Management, 38(5), 49–57.Google Scholar
  54. Cooper, R.G. (1996): Overhauling the new product process, Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Courtright, J.A./ Fairhurst, G.L./ Rogers, E. (1989): Interaction Patterns in Organic and Mechanistic Systems, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Dec), 773–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Cyert, R.M./ March, J.G. (1963): A behavioral theory of the firm, Englewood Cliffs, (1963).Google Scholar
  57. Damanpour, F. (1991): Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, 555–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Damanpour, F. (1996): Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited — Effects of Contingency Factors, Industrial Sectors, and Innovation Characteristics, Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 7, 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Daft, R./ Becker, S. (1978): Innovation in Organizations: Adoption in School Organization, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  60. Daft, R.L./ Lengel, R.L. (1986): Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.Google Scholar
  61. De Dreu, C.K.W./ West, M.A. (2001): Minority Dissent and Team Innovation: The Importance of Participation in Decision Making, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 6, 1191–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. De Dreu, C.K.W./ Weingart, L.R. (2003): Task versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 4, 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Deci, E.L./ Ryan, R.M. (1985): Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  64. Deci, E.L./ Koestner, R./ Ryan, R.M. (1999): The Undermining Effect Is a Reality After All — Extrinsic Rewards, Task Interest, and Self-Determination: Reply to Eisenberger, Pierce, and Cameron (1999) and Lepper, Henderlong, and Gingras (1999), Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125, 692–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Dension, D.R./ Hart, S.L./ Kahn, J.A. (1996): From Chimneys to cros-functional teams: Developing and Valdiating a Diagnostic Model, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1005–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Deshpande, R. (1982): The Organizational Context of Market Research Use, Journal of Marketing, 46(Fall), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Deutsch, M. (1949): A theory of cooperation and competition, Human Relations, 2, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Devaux, S.A. (1999): Total Project Control, New York (1999).Google Scholar
  69. Donnellon, A. (1993): Crossfunctional teams in product development: Accommodating the structure to the process, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Dougherty, D. (1992): Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms, Organization Science, Vol.3, No. 2 (May 1992), 179–202.Google Scholar
  71. Dougherty, D./ Hardy, C. (1996): Sustained Product Innovation in Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming Innovation-to-Organization Problems, The Academy of Management Journal, 39,5, 1120–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Duncan, R.B. (1976): The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation, in: Kilmann, R./ Pondy, L./ Slevin, D. (eds.), The Management of Organization Design: Volume I, Strategies and Implementation, New York, 1976, 167–188.Google Scholar
  73. Dunk, A.S./ Kilgore, A. (2004): Financial factors in R&D budget setting: the impact of interfunctional market coordination, strategic alliances, and the nature of competition, Accounting & Finance, 44,2 (Jul), 123–138.Google Scholar
  74. Eisenberger, R./ Cameron, J. (1998): Reward, Intrinsic Interest, and Creativity: New Findings, American Psychologist, June, 676–678.Google Scholar
  75. Eisenberger, R./ Armeli, S./ Pretz, J. (1998): Can the promise of reward increase creativity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 704–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Eisenberger, R./ Rhoades, L. (2001): Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 728–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989): Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review, The Academy of Management Review, 14,1, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Eisenhardt, K.M./ Tabrizi, B.N. (1995): Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, Issue 1, 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Eom, S.B./ Wen H.J./ Ashill, N. (2006): The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Vol. 4, No. 2 (July), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Fassott, G. (2006): Die PLS-Pfadmodellierung: Entwicklungsrichtungen, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen, in: Bliemel, F./ Eggert, A./ Fassott, G./ Henseler, J. (eds.): Handbuch PLS-Pfadmodellierung — Methode, Anwendung, Praxisbeispiele, Stuttgart (2006), 19–29.Google Scholar
  81. Ford, R.C./ Randolph, W.A. (1992): Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management, Journal of Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Fornell, C. (1982): A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis: Methods Volume 1, New York (1982).Google Scholar
  83. Fornell, C./ Bookstein, F.L. (1982): Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XIX (November 1982), pp. 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Formell, C./ Larcker, D.F. (1981): Evaluating Strucurual Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Feb., 1981), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Fornell, C./ Lorange, P./ Roos, J. (1990): The Cooperative Venture Formation Process: A Latent Variable Structural Modeling Approach, Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 10, 1246–1255.Google Scholar
  86. Galbraith, J.R. (1973): Designing Complex Organizations, Reading (MA), (1973).Google Scholar
  87. Galbraith, J.R. (1994): Competing with flexible lateral organizations (2nd ed.), Reading (MA), 1994.Google Scholar
  88. Ganesan, S./ Malter, A.J./ Rindfleisch, A. (2005): Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69 (October 2005), 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Garrett, T.C./ Buisson, D.H./ Yap, C.M. (2006): National culture and R&D and marketing integration mechanisms in new product development: A cross-cultural study between Singapore and New Zealand, Industrial Marketing Management, 35(2006), 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Garud, R./ Van de Ven, A. (1992): An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Garvin, D.A. (1988): Managing Quality, New York (1988).Google Scholar
  92. Gebert, D./ Boerner, S./ Kearney, E. (2006): Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and its consequences for the management of diversity, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 431–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Gladstein, D.L. (1984): Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29,4, 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Gomez-Mejia, L.R./ Balkan, D.R. (1989): Effectiveness of individual and aggregate compensation strategies, Industrial Relations, 28, 431–445.Google Scholar
  95. Granovetter, M. (1973): The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Greenberg, J. (1993): The Social Side of Fairness: Interpersonal and Informational Classes of Organizational Justice, in: Cropanzano, R. (ed.): Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, Hillsdale (NJ), 79–103.Google Scholar
  97. Greve, H.R. (2003): A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures And Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46 (2003), No. 6, 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Griffin, A. (1997): PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 191–215.Google Scholar
  99. Griffin, A./ Hauser, J.R. (1996): Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Grifftiths-Hemans, J./ Grover, R. (2006): Setting the Stage for Creative New Products: Investigating the Idea Fruition Process, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34, No.1, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Gupta, A.K./ Raj, S.P./ Wilemon, D. (1986): A Model for Studying R&D-Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process, Journal of Marketing, 50 (Apr), 7–17.Google Scholar
  102. Guzzo, R.A./ Shea, G.P. (1992): Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations, in Dunnette, M.D./ Hough, L.M. (eds): Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3, Palo Alto (CA), 269–313.Google Scholar
  103. Hackman, J.R. (1987): The design of work teams, in: Lorsch, J.W. (ed.): The Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Englewood Cliffs (NJ), 315–342.Google Scholar
  104. Hage, J./ Aiken, M. (1967): Program Change and Organizational Properties: A Comparative Analysis, American Journal of Sociology, 72 (March), 503–519.Google Scholar
  105. Harackiewicz, J.M./ Manderlink, G./ Sansone, C. (1984): Rewarding pinball wizardry: Effects of evaluation and cue value on intrinsic interest, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Hauptmann, O./ Hirji, K.K. (1996): The influence of process concourrency of project outcomes in product development: an empirical study of cross-functional teams, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Henard, D.H./ Szymanski, D. M. (2001): Why Some New Products Are More Succesful Than Others, Journal of Marketing Research, 38,3 (2001), 362–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Henke, J.W./ Krachenberg, A.R./ Lyons, T.F. (1995): Cross-functional teams: Good concept, poor implementation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 216–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Hennessey, B.A./ Amabile, T.M. (1998): Reward, Intrinsic, Motivation, and Creativity, American Psychologist, June 1998, 674–675.Google Scholar
  110. Henseler, J. (2005): Einführung in die PLS-Pfadmodellierung, WiSt, No. 2 (February), 70–75.Google Scholar
  111. Herold, D.M./ Jayaraman, N./ Narayanaswamy, C.R. (2006): What is the Relationship between Organizational Slack and Innovation?, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. XVIII, Number 3, Fall 2006, 372–392.Google Scholar
  112. Hershock, R.J./ Cowman, T.C.D./ Peters, D. (1994): FROM EXPERIENCE: Action teams that work, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Hertel, G./ Konradt, U./ Orlikowski, B. (2004): Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams, European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, Vol. 13,1 (Mar), 1–28.Google Scholar
  114. Hitt, M.A./ Nixon, R.D./ Hoskisson, R.F./ Kochhar, R. (1999): Corporate Entrepreneurship and Cross-Functional Fertilization: Activation, Process and Disintegration of a New Product Design Team, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Spring 99, Vol. 23, Issue 3, 145–167.Google Scholar
  115. Hoegl, M./ Gemuenden, H.G. (2001): Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence, Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 4, July–August 2001,435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Hoegl, M./ Parboteeah, K.P./ Gemuenden, H.G. (2003): When teamwork really matters; task innovativeness as a moderator of the teamwork-performance relationship in software development projects, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Hoegl, M./ Proserpio, L. (2004): Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects, Research Policy, 33(2004), 1153–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Hoegl, M./ Weinkauf, K. (2005): Managing Task Interdependencies in Multi-Team Projects: A Longitudinal Study, Journal of Management Studies, 42,6 (Sep), 1287–1308.Google Scholar
  119. Hoegl, M./ Weinkauf, K./ Gemuenden, H.G. (2004): Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study, Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan–Feb), 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Holland, S./ Gaston, K./ Gomes, J. (2000): Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 2, Issue 3, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Hoskisson, R.E./ Hitt, M.A./ Hill, C.L. (1993): Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms, Organization Science, Vol. 4, No. 2 (May), 325–341.Google Scholar
  122. Huizenga, E.I. (2004): Innovation Management in the ICT-Sector — How Frontrunners Stay Ahead, Northhampton (MA), 2004.Google Scholar
  123. Hulland, J. (1999): Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies, Strategic Management Journal, 20(1999), 105–204.Google Scholar
  124. Jackson, S.E./ May, K.E./ Whitney, K. (1995): Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making team, in: Guzzo, R.A./ Salas, E. (eds): Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, San Francisco (Ca), 204–261.Google Scholar
  125. Jackson, S.E./ Joshi, A./ Erhardt, N.L. (2003): Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications, Journal of Management, 29(6), 2003, 801–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Jacobson, R./ Aaker, D.A. (1987): The Strategic Role of Product Quality, Journal of Marketing, 51 (October), 31–44.Google Scholar
  127. Janis, I.L. (1982): Victims of Group Think: A psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascos, Boston (MA), (1982).Google Scholar
  128. Jansen, J.P./ Van den Bosch, F.A.J./ Volberda, H.W. (2006): Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators, ERIM Report Series Research in Management, ERS-2006-038-STR (July 2006), Erasmus Research Institute of Management; Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
  129. Jassawalla, A.R./ Sashittal, H.C. (1998): An examination of Collaboration in High-Technology New Product Development Processes, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(1998), 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Jaworski, B. (1988): Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, July, 22–39.Google Scholar
  131. Jehn, K.A. (1994): Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Jehn, K.A. (1995): A multimethod examination of the benefit and detriments of intragroup conflict, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Jehn, K.A. (1997): Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict, in: De Dreu, C.K.W./ Van de Vliert, E. (eds.), Using conflict in organizations. London (1997), 87–100.Google Scholar
  134. Jehn, K.A./ Northcraft, G.B./ Neale, M.A. (1999): Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Jensen, M.C. (1986): Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, Amercian Economic Review, 76, 323–329.Google Scholar
  136. Jensen, M.C. (1993): The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems, Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Jobber, D./ Allen, N./ Oakland, J. (1985): The impact of telephone notification strategies on response to an industrial mail survey, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 2, Issue 4, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Joereskog, K.G./ Soerborn, D. (1993): New features in LISREL 8, Chicago (1993).Google Scholar
  139. Joreskog, K.G./ Wold, H. (1982): The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: historical and comparative aspects, in: Joreskog, K.G./ Wold, H. (eds.): Systems under indirect observation: causality, structure, prediction, Vol. 1, Amsterdam (1982), 263–270.Google Scholar
  140. John, G./ Martin, J. (1984): Effects of Organizational Structure of Marketing Planning on Credibility and Utilization of Plan Output, Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (May), 170–183.Google Scholar
  141. Kahn, K.B. (1996): Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development Performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(1996), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Keller, R.T. (2001): Cross-Functional Project Groups In Research And New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, And Outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, Issue 3 (Jun), 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Keil, M./ Tan, B.C.Y./ Wei, K.-K./ Saarinen, T./ Tuuainen, V./ Wassenaar, A. (2000): A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Committment Behavior in Software Projects, MIS-Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2 (June), 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Kirton, M. (1994): Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem solving, New York (1994).Google Scholar
  145. Knoben, J./ Oerlemans, L.A.G. (2006): Proximity and Inter-Organizational Collaboration: A Literature Review, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 8, No. 2, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Kohn, A. (1993): Why incentive plans cannot work, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, Issue 5 (Sep/Oct, 54–60.Google Scholar
  147. Kruglanski, A.W./ Friedman, I./ Zeevi, G. (1971): The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance, Journal of Personality, 39, 606–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Larson, E.W./ Gobeli, D.H. (1987): Matrix Management: contradictions and insights. California Management Review, 29(4), 126–138.Google Scholar
  149. Larson, E.W./ Gobeli, D.H. (1988): Organizing for Product Development Projects, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5, 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Laufer, A. (1997): Simultaneous management: Managing project in a dynamic envrionement, Boston (1997).Google Scholar
  151. Lawrence, P.R./ Lorsch, J.W. (1967): Differentiation and integration in complex organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12,1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Leenders, M.A.A.M./ Wierenga, B. (2001): The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D, Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(2002), 305–317.Google Scholar
  153. Lewis, M.W./ Welsh, M.A./ Dehler, G.E./ Dehler, G.E./ Green, S.G. (2002): Product Development Tensions: Exploring Contrasting Styles of Project Management, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, 546–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Lounamaa, P.H./ March, J.G. (1987): Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Science, 33, 107–123.Google Scholar
  155. Lovelace, K./ Shapiro, D.L./ Weingart, L.R. (2001): Maximizing Cross-Functional New Product Teams’ Innovativeness And Constraint Adherence: A Conflict Communications Pespective, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 Issue 4 (Aug), 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Lukas, B.A./ Menon, A. (2004): New Product Quality: Intended and Unintended Consequences of New Product Development Speed, Journal of Business Research, 57(11), 1258–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Maltz, E./ Kohli, A.K. (2000): Reducing Marketing’s Conflict With Other Functions: The Differential Effects of Integrating Mechanism, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 4, 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. March, J.G. (1981): Footnotes to organizational change, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Marino, K.E. (1982): Structural Correlates of Affirmative Action Compliance, Journal of Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. McDonough, E.F. (2000): Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross Functional Teams, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(2000), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. McDonough, E.F./ Griffin, A. (1997): The impact of organizational tools on new product development efficiency and effectiveness, Proceedings of the international PDMA Conference, Monterey (CA), October 1997.Google Scholar
  162. McDonough, E.F./ Barczak, G. (1991): Speeding up new product development: The effects of leadership style and source of technology, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. McGrath, J.E. (1964): Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction, New York (1964).Google Scholar
  164. Me Shane, S./ von Glinow, M.A. (2006): Organizational Behavior, Boston (2006).Google Scholar
  165. Menon, A./ Jaworski, B.J./ Kohli, A.K. (1997): Product Quality: Impact of Interdepartmental Interactions, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 25,3 (Summer), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Miliken, F.J./ Martins, L.L. (1996): Searching for Common Threads. Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups, Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Millson, M.R.; Wilemon, D. (2002): The Impact of Organizational Integration and Product Developement Proficiency on Market Success, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(2002), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Moenaert, R.K./ Souder, W.E. (1990): An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(2), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Moenaert, R.K./ Souder, W.E./ De Meyer, A./ Deschoolmester, D. (1994): R&D-Marketing Integration Mechanisms, Communication Flows, and Innovation Success, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Naveh, E. (2005): The effect of integrated product development on efficiency and innovation, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43, No. 13, 1 (Jul), 2789–2808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Nihitila, J. (1999): R&D-Production integration in the early phases of new product development projects, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Nohria, N./ Gulati, R. (1996): Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1245–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Nunnally, J.C. (1978): Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  174. Oldham, G.R./ Cummings, A. (1996): Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Olson, E.M., Walker, O.C., Ruekert, R.W. (1995): Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, No. 1 (Jan), 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Olson, E.M./ Walker, O.C./ Ruekert, R.W./ Bonner, J.M. (2001): Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Osterloh, M./ Frost, J./ Frey, B.S. (2002): The Dynamics of Motivation in New Organizational Forms, International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 9, No. 1, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Pfeffer, J. (1982): Organizations and Organization Theory. Stanford, CA (1982)Google Scholar
  179. Pfeffer, J./ Salancik, G.R. (1978): The External Control of Organizations: a Resource Dependency Perspective, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  180. Pinto, M.B./ Pinto, J.K. (1990): Project Team Communication and Cross-Functional Cooperation in New Program Development, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7,3, 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Pinto, M.B./ Pinto, J.K./ Prescott, J.E. (1993): Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation, Management Science, Vol. 39, No. 10 (Oct), 1281–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Phillips, L.W./ Chang, D.R./ Buzzell, R.D. (1983): Product Quality, Cost Position, and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypothesis, Journal of Marketing, 47 (Spring), 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Podsakoff, P.M./ MacKenzie, S.B./ Podsakoff, N.B. (2003): Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 5, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Quinn, R.E. (1988): Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance, San Francisco (1988).Google Scholar
  185. Roberts, E.B. (1995): Benchmarking the strategic management of technology II, Research Technology Management, 38(2), 18–26.Google Scholar
  186. Rochford, L./ Rudelius, W. (1992): How involving more functional areas within a firm affects the new product success, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Rossiter, John R. (2002): The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 19, S. 305–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Ruekert, Robert W./ Walker Jr., Orville C. (1987): Marketing’s Interaction With Other Functional Units: A conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence, Journal of Marketing, 51 (January), 1–19.Google Scholar
  189. Sansone, C./ Harackiewicz, J. M. (1998): “Reality” is complicated, American Psychologist, 53, 673–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Sarin, S./ Mahajan, V. (2001): The Effect of Reward Structures on the Performance of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65 (Apr), 35–53.Google Scholar
  191. Schermelleh-Engel, K./ Moosbrugger, H./ Mueller, H. (2006): Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures, Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 8, No. 2, 28–74.Google Scholar
  192. Scholderer, J./ Balderjahn, I. (2006): PLS versus LISREL: Ein Methodenvergleich, in: Bliemel, F./ Eggert, A./ Fassott, G./ Henseler, J. (eds.): Handbuch PLS-Pfadmodellierung — Methode, Anwendung, Praxisbeispiele, Stuttgart (2006), 19–29.Google Scholar
  193. Schulze, A./ Hoegl, M. (2006): Knowledge Creation in New Product Development Projects, Journal of Management, Vol. 32 No. 2 (Apr.), 210–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Sethi, R. (2000a): New Product Quality and Product Developement Teams, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64 (April 2000), 1–14.Google Scholar
  195. Sethi, R. (2000b): Superordinate Identity in Cross-Functional Product Development Teams: Its Antecedents and Effect on New Product Performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 3, 330–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Sethi, R./ Smith, D.C./ Park, C.W. (2001): Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXXVIII (Feb), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Shalley, C.E./ Gilson, L.L./ Blum, T.C. (2000): Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to leave, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Shalley, C.E./ Gilson, L.L. (2004): What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity, The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Sicotte, H./ Langely, A. (2000): Integration Mechanisms and R&D project performance, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Song, M./ Dyer, B./ Thieme, R.J. (2006): Conflict Management and Innovation Performance: An integrated Contingency Perspective, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34, No. 3, 34–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Song, M./ Thieme, J.R./ Xie, J. (1998): The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: An exploratory study, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Song, M./ Xie, J./ Dyer, B. (2000): Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Manager’s Conflict-Handling Behaviors, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64 (Jan), 50–66.Google Scholar
  203. Sosik, J.J./ Potoski, D./ Jung, D.I. (2002): Adaptive Self-Regulation: Meeting Other’s Expectations of Leadership and Performance, Journal of Social Psychology, 2002, 142(2), 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Souder, W.E./ Moenaert, R.K. (1992): Integrating Marketing and R&D Project Personnel within Innovation Projects: An Information Uncertainty Model, Journal of Management Studies, 29,4 (Jul.), 485–512.Google Scholar
  205. Spender, J.-C./ Kessler, E.H. (1995): Managing the uncertainties of innovation: Extending Thompson (1967): Human Relations, 48(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Stewart, G.L./ Barrick, M.R. (2000): Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2 (Apr.), 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Stock, R.M. (2006): Interorganizational Teams as Boundary Spanners Between Supplier and Customer Companies, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 588–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Subin, I./ Workman, J.P. (2004): Market Orientation, Creativity and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68 (Apr), 114–132.Google Scholar
  209. Swink, M. (2000): Technological Innovativeness as a Moderator of New Product Design Integration and Top Management Support, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 208–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Tajfel, H. (1982a): Social identity and intergroup behavior, Cambridge (1982).Google Scholar
  211. Tajfel, H. (1982b): Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Taylor, J./ McAdam, R. (2005): Innovation adoption and implementation in organizations: a review and critique, Journal of General Management, 30,1, 17–38.Google Scholar
  213. Tenenhaus, M./ Vinzi, V.E./ Chatelin, Y.-M./ Lauro, C. (2005): PLS path modeling, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48, 159–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Thamhain, H.J. (1990): Managing technologically innovative team efforts toward new product success, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Thamain, H.J. (2003): Managing innovative R&D teams, R&D Management, 33,3 (2003), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Tierney, P./ Farmer, S.M./ Graen, G.B. (1999): An examination of leadership and employee creativity: the relevance of traits and relationships, Personnel Psychology, 1999, 52, 591–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Trent, R.J./ Monczka, R.M. (1994): Effective cross-functional sourcing teams: critical success factors. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(4), 3–11.Google Scholar
  218. Troy, L.C./ Szymanski, D.M./ Varadarajan, P.R. (2001): Generating New Product Ideas: An Initial Investigation of the Role of Market Information and Organizational Characteristics, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 29, No. 1, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Tushman, M./ Smith, W.K./ Wood, R.C./ Westerman, G./ O’Reilly, C. (2004): Innovation Streams and Ambidextrous Organization Designs, Working Paper, Harvard University, Dec. 15, 2004, 1–63.Google Scholar
  220. van der Stede, W.A. (2000): The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: budgetary slack creation and managerial short-term orientation, Accounting, Organizations & Society, Vol. 25, Issue 6 (Aug), 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Vandevelde, A./ Van Dierdonck, R. (2003): Managing the design-manufacturing interface, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23, No. 11, 1326–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Vázquez-Carrasco, R./ Foxall, G.R. (2006): Positive vs. Negative switching barriers: the influence of service consumers’ need for variety, Journal of Consumer Behavior, 5, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Vroom, V.H. (1964): Work and motivation, New York (1964).Google Scholar
  224. Wageman, R. (1995): Interdependence and group effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. Wageman, R./ Baker, G. (1997): Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence and group performance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Wall, S./ Lepsinger, R. (1994): Cross-functional obstacles, Training (May), 125–126.Google Scholar
  227. Webber, S.S./ Donahue, L. M.. (2001): Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis, Journal of Management, 27,2, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Webster, C. (2006): An empirical analysis of the relationships between the interactive use of performance measurement systems, creativity and performance: the intervening role of psychological empowerment, Working Paper (Monash University, AU), available for download: <>, (Dec. 2nd 2006), 1–33.
  229. Weinkauf, K./ Högl, M./ Gemünden, H.-G./ Hölzle, K. (2005): Zusammenarbeit zwischen organisatorischen Gruppen: Ein Literaturüberblick über die Intergroup Relations-, Schnittstellen-und Boundary-Spanning Forschung, Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. West, M.A./ Hirst, G./ Richter, A./ Shipton, H. (2004): Twelve steps to heaven: Successfully managing change through developing innovative teams, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. West, M.A. (2002): Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups, Applied Psychology 51(3), 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. White, C.J./ Varadarajan, P.R./ Dacin, P.A. (2003): Market Situation Interpretation and Response: The Role of Cognitive Style, Organizational Culture, and Information Use, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67 (July 2003), 63–79.Google Scholar
  233. Wilson, J. (1966): Innovation in organizations: Both toward a theory, in: Thompson, J.D. (ed): Approaches to organizational design, Pittsburg (1996), 195–218.Google Scholar
  234. Williams, L.J./ Edwards, J.R./ Vandenberg, R.J. (2003): Recent Advances in Causal Modeling Methods for Organizational and Management Research, Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 6, 903–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Wold, H. (1982): Soft Modeling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions, in: Joreskog, K.G./ Wold, H. (eds.): Systems Under Indirect Observations: Part 2, Amsterdam (1982), 1–54.Google Scholar
  236. Wold, H. (1985): Systems analysis by partial least squares, In: Nijkamp, P./ Leitner, H./ Wrigley, N. (eds.): Measuring the immeasurable, Dordrecht, 221–252.Google Scholar
  237. Woodman, R.W./ Sawyer, J.E./ Griffin, R.W. (1993): Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativtiy, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, 293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Wurst, K. (2001): Zusammenarbeit in innovativen Multi-Team Projekten, Wiesbaden (2001).Google Scholar
  239. Xie, J./ Song, M./ Stringfellow, A. (1998): Interfunctional Conflict, Conflict Resolution Styles, and New Product Success: A Four-Culture Comparison, Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 12, 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. Xie, J./ Song, M./ Stringfellow, A. (2003): Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Incongruity on New Product Development in Five Countries: A Marketing View, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. Zimdars, L. (2003): The World of Cross-Functional Teams, in: Parker, G.M. (ed): Cross-Functional Teams: Working with Allies, Enemies, and Other Stangers, San Francisco (CA), 1–11.Google Scholar
  242. Zaltman, G./ Duncan, R./ Holbeck, J. (1973): Innovations and Organizations, New York (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2008

Personalised recommendations