Abstract
This chapter provides a summary of key information about the buyout phenomenon. It contains a definition and a delineation of different types of buyouts, an overview of key participants in the buyout market, and also an outline of the historic development in relevant buyout markets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Forst, M. (1992), pp. 5–6; Forst, M. (1993), p. 5; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), p. 22; Honert, J. (1995), pp. 7–8; Huydts, H.J. (1992), p. 19; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 9; Neukirchen, D. (1996), pp. 4 and 6; Schmid, H. (1994), p. 5.
Schmid, H. (1994), p. 9.
Arbeitskreis Finanzierung der Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft (1990), pp. 831–832.
Forst, M. (1993), p. 6; Neukirchen, D. (1996), pp. 5 and 13–17; Schmid, H. (1994), p. 21. In Germany, the NewCo typically has the legal form of a ‘Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH)’, Schmid, H. (1994), p. 128.
The cost of capital reflects the expected minimum rate of return (discount rate) to capital providers in the market, which is necessary to attract funds to a particular investment, Breuer, W. (1994), p. 819.
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the average cost of capital of all firm’s securities. The weights are determined by the relative proportions of the different securities in a firm’s capital structure, Breuer, W. (1998), p. 56.
Breuer, W. (1998), p. 44; Schmid, H. (1994), p. 187.
Gerke, W./ Steiner, M. (2001), pp. 1323–1324.
Gutenberg, E. (1987), pp. 208 et seqq. See also Bühner, R. (1990a), pp. 149–152.
Breuer, W. (1998), pp. 58–59; Kim, E.H. (1978), p. 45.
For an overview of explicit and implicit assumptions, see e.g., Copeland, T.E./ Weston, J.F. (1992), p. 439.
Modigliani, F./ Miller, M.H. (1958), pp. 261–297. Several authors have confirmed the MM no-tax theorem, see e.g., Baron, D.P. (1974); Hamada, R.S. (1969); Stiglitz, J.E. (1969, 1974); Rubinstein, M.E. (1973). However, the assumption of constant (i.e., risk independent) cost of capital for debt by MM has been questioned by critics. STIGLITZ and RUBINSTEIN prove that even taking into account that the cost of debt rises with increasing leverage, the assumption of constant WACC by MM still holds true, Rubinstein, M.E. (1973); Stiglitz, J.E. (1969).
Modigliani, F./ Miller, M.H. (1963), pp. 433–443.
Baxter, N.D. (1967), p. 395. DeANGELO/MASULIS analyse the impact of corporate and personal taxation on the capital structure. They conclude that ‘each firm has a unique interior optimum leverage decision due solely to the interaction of personal and corporate tax treatment of debt and equity’, see DeAngelo, H./Masulis, R.W. (1980), p. 27.
For various direct and indirect costs, see e.g., Franke, G./ Hax, H. (2003), p. 11.
Hirshleifer, J. (1970), p. 264; Kraus, A./Litzenberger, R.H. (1973), pp. 911–922; Robichek, A.A./Myers, S.C. (1965), pp. 20–22.
Breuer, W. (1998), pp. 109–112; Fama, E.F./French, K.R. (2004); Frank, M.Z./Goyal, V.K. (2003); Haugen, R.A./Senbet, L.W. (1978); Long, M.S./Malitz, E.B. (1985); Titman, S./Wessels, R. (1988).
For more detailed information on the efficiency of capital markets, see Fama, E.F. (1970).
Breuer, W. (1998), pp. 119–120
For a detailed overview, see e.g., Breuer, W. (1998), pp. 212–234; Hart, O. (2001).
Pecking-order theory states that companies have a preferred hierarchy for financing sources. They prefer internal financing (retained earnings and the effects of depreciation) before they draw on any form of external funds. If a company must use external funds, the order of preference is the following: debt, convertible securities, preferred stock, and common stock, Myers, S.C. (1984).
Arbeitskreis Finanzierung der Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft (1990), p. 832; Baker, G.P./Montgomery, CA. (1994), p. 1; Birley, S. (1984), p. 33; Honert, J. (1995), p. 32; Huydts, H.J. (1992), p. 22; Then Bergh, F. (1998), p. 8.
Forst, M. (1993), pp. 6–7; Hatzig, C. (1995), p. 23; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 9; Schmid, H. (1994), p. 41; Then Bergh, F. (1998), p. 9.
Federal Reserve Board, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Comptroller of the Currency.
Schmid, H. (1994), p. 42. The term ‘debt’ includes senior and also subordinated/junior debt.
Berger, M. (1993), pp. 6 and 19; Grundfest, J.A. (1989), p. 255; Honert, J. (1995), p. 34; McNeill Stancill, J. (1988), p. 18; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 11.
Küting, K/ Weber, C.-P. (1999), pp. 136–137.
E.g., Schmidt, R. (1993), p. 282. Most authors share a common understanding of the general definition of the term ‘cash flow’. The detailed definitions, however, are diverse, Rehkugler, H./Poddig, T. (1988), p. 220. For a critical assessment of different cash flow definitions, see Coenenberg, A.G. (2000), pp. 933–943.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), pp. 83–84.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), pp. 84–85; Honert, J. (1995), pp. 34–36; Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 66 and 206; Schwien, B. (1995), p. 87.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), pp. 82–83; Honert, J. (1995), p. 34; Schmid, H. (1994), p. 130. Historically in the US and also in the UK, the share of debt has been significantly higher compared to more recent buyout transactions, see e.g., Burge, S.W. (1994), p. 32; Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 138 and 140.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), p. 79; Honert, J. (1995), pp. 32–34; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 205.
Schmid, H. (1994), p. 133.
Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 133–134.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), p. 23; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 67.
Forst, M. (1992), pp. 13–14; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), pp. 86–88; Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 67–68.
Forst, M. (1993), p. 145; Honert, J. (1995), p. 40.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), p. 82; Honert, J. (1995), p. 37; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 87; Schmid, H. (1994), p. 130. FORST, GRÄPER and LUIPPOLD report a mezzanine share of approximately 25%, Forst, M. (1992), p. 99; Gräper, M. (1993), p. 110; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 215. Based on a sample of eight buyouts, VEST even states a mezzanine share of approximately 45%, Vest, P. (1995), pp. 258–259.
Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 67; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 86. In Germany, this type of financing is typically structured as ‘partiarische Darlehen’,’ stille Beteiligungen’, and ‘Genußscheine’, see e.g., Schmid, H. (1994), p. 135–136.
Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 136–137.
Forst, M. (1992), p. 9; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), p. 81; Wright, M./Robbie, K. (1996), p. 692.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), p. 94; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 69; Schmid, H. (1994), p. 130; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 78.
Forst, M. (1992), p. 25; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), p. 82; Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 69 and 130; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 87.
This categorisation does not include buyouts which involve different types of buyers (so-called ‘hybrid forms’). For an overview, see Jakoby, S. (2000), p. 26.
Beaver, G. (2001), pp. 307–308; Huydts, H.J. (1992), p. 20.
Jakoby, S. (2000), pp. 15–16.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Chiplin, B./ Albrighton, M. (2000), p. 140.
Wright, M./ Thompson, S./ Robbie, K. (1992), p. 50.
Arbeitskreis Finanzierung der Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft (1990), pp. 831–832; Baruch, Y./Gebbie, D. (1998), p. 423; Beaver, G. (2001), p. 309; Boxberg, F. von (1991), pp. 9–10; Drukarczyk, J. (1990), p. 545; Forst, M. (1992), p. 8; Krebs, A.E. (1990), p. 6; Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 18 and 22–23; Wright, M./Hoskisson, R.E./Busenitz, L.W. (2001), p. 148.
Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 32–33.
Neukirchen, D. (1996), p. 4; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 5.
Forst, M. (1992), p. 7; Milde, H. (1990b), p. 655; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 5.
Honert, J. (1995), p. 8; Neukirchen, D. (1996), p. 4.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 7; Huydts, H. J. (1992), p. 21.
Arbeitskreis Finanzierung der Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft (1990), p. 832; Schmid, H. (1994), p. 33.
Jakoby, S. (2000), p. 17. For a critical assessment of this delineation criterion, see Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 33–34, footnote 93.
For a more detailed overview of secondary MBO characteristics, see e.g., Jakoby, S. (2000), pp. 12–13; Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 35–37; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 5.
Birley, S. (1984), p. 33; Forst, M. (1993), pp. 16–17; Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 44–45.
Albach, H. (1989), p. 105.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Chiplin, B./ Albrighton, M. (2000), p. 140.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), p. 24.
Luippold, T. L. (1991), p. 16; Wright, M./Robbie, K. (1996), p. 691.
Achleitner, A.-K./ Fingerle, C.H. (2003), p. 8; Wright, M./Robbie, K. (1996), p. 692. LAUB, however, holds a different view and considers the defined combination of incumbent managers and new managers in East German companies as industrial buy-ins, Laub, J. (1995), p. 24.
Honert, J. (1995), p. 12.
Achleitner, A.-K./ Fingerle, C.H. (2003), p. 8; Beaver, G. (2001), p. 309; Forst, M. (1993), p. 10; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), p. 24; Nadig, L. (1992), p. 23.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 14.
Schwien, B. (1995), p. 20.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Chiplin, B./ Albrighton, M. (2000), p. 140; Wright, M./Robbie, K. (1996), pp. 691–692.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), p. 29.
Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 14.
Berger, M. (1993), pp. 22–23; Jakoby, S. (2000), p. 36; Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 159–161.
Jakoby, S. (2000), p. 39.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 23; Forst, M. (1992), p. 80; Huydts, H.J. (1992), p. 28; Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 22 and 160; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 14. SCHMID, however, argues that the ‘maintenance of company tradition’ might be an overstated argument. For more details, see Schmid, H. (1994), p. 87.
Forst, M. (1992), p. 41; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 161.
Gräper, M. (1993), p. 105.
Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 18. The sale of a devision or subsidiary can also be defined as spin-off buyout, Forst, M. (1993), p. 12; Nadig, L. (1992), p.11. However according to BERGER, this understanding of spin-off assumes a definition of spin-off in a broader sense, Berger, M. (1993), pp. 10–11.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 25; Forst, M. (1992), pp. 63–64; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 19; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 15.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 25; Forst, M. (1992), p. 65; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 19.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 25; Forst, M. (1992), pp. 64–66.
The term ‘conglomerate discount’ circumscribes the fact that the total value of a conglomerate may be lower than the sum of its parts if valued independently, see e.g., Maksimovic, V./ Phillips, G. (2002).
Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 19.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 26; Honert, J. (1995), p. 12.
Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 19.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 25; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 19; Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 15.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 26; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 19.
Forst, M. (1992), p. 80; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 20.
Müller, R. (1986), pp. 33–34.
Baetge, J./ Plock, M. (2001), p. 798.
Bellinger, B. (1962), p. 53.
E.g., Krystek, U. (1987), p. 67; Müller, R. (1986), pp. 64–65
For an overview of how early warning systems can be used to indicate a company crisis, see e.g., Schmidt, R. (1994).
Kraft, V. (2001), p. 71.
For more details on the turnaround process, see Kraft, V. (2001), pp. 65–70.
For details on the delineation of turnaround and restructuring, see Kraft, V. (2001), pp. 64–65 and Nadig, L. (1992), pp. 55–60.
Jakoby, S. (2000), p. 43.
Jakoby, S. (2000), p. 44.
Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 22–23.
Schwenkedel, S. (1991), p. 16.
Vickers, J./ Yarrow, G. (1991), pp. 113–121.
Laub, J. (1995), pp. 38–39 and 47; Schwien, B. (1995), pp. 30–33.
Treuhand (1994), p. 1. For reasons why buyouts might not be feasible to privatise formerly state-owned companies in the eastern part of Germany, see Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 163–165.
Stahl, M. (1995), pp. 197–198.
Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 162.
Jones, T.M./ Hunt, R.O. (1991), p. 833; Kessel, A. (1994), p. 85; Nadig, L. (1992), p. 23.
DeAngelo, H./ DeAngelo, L.E. (1987), pp. 44–45. FORST, however, doubts that cost savings are a relevant reason for a going-private buyout, given that other cost blocks such as executive compensation are more significant compared to listing costs, Forst, M. (1993), p. 32.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 26.
Kessel, A. (1994), p. 87.
Milde, H. (1990a), p. 8.
BVK (2005), p. 3.
For more detailed information, see EVCA (2003) and NVCA (2003).
Kraft, V. (2001), pp. 34–35.
Bader, H. (1996), p. 113.
Kraft, V. (201), p. 38.
Bader, H. (1996), pp. 172–173 and 275.
Kraft, V. (201), p. 38.
Kraft, V. (2001), p. 38.
Bader, H. (1996), p. 17. GOTTSCHALG distinguishes four complementary roles of private equity firms: valuation expert, facilitator of organisational change, financier of the best management team, and ‘governance intermediary’, Gottschalg, O. (2000), pp. 13–24.
Bader, H. (1996), p. 154.
Kraft, V. (2001), p. 39.
Bader, H. (1996), pp. 156–157; Toll, D.M. et al. (1999), p.13.
Bader, H. (1996), p. 157.
Fenn, G.W./ Liang, N./ Prowse, S. (1997), p. 47.
Bader, H. (1996), p. 158.
Bader, H. (1996), p. 156.
Bader, H. (1996), p. 158.
Bader, H. (1996), p. 157; Toll, D.M. (1999), pp. 14–15.
Schmid, H. (1994), p. 111.
Ambrose, B.W./ Winters, D.B. (1992), p. 94; Braun, C. (1989), p. 21; Fox, I./Marcus, A. (1992), p. 67; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), pp. 51–52 and 58–59; Honert, J. (1995), pp. 54–59; Jakoby, S. (2000), p. 234; Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 55–60. However, in some cases buyouts are targeted to realise growth opportunities and also take place in high-tech sectors, e.g. Robbie, K./Wright, M./Albrighton, M. (1999); Wright, M./Burrows, A./Loihl, A. (2001), pp. 12–15; Wright, M./Hoskisson, R.E./Busenitz, L.W. (2001). For an overview of key criteria for buyouts, see e.g., Jakoby, S. (2000), pp. 225–229; Reicheneder, T. (1992), p. 193.
Braun, C. (1989), p. 22; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), p. 62.
For a more detailed overview of financing stages, see e.g., Fenn, G.W./ Liang, N./ Prowse, S. (1997), p. 28; Kraft, V. (2001), p. 45; Ruhnka, J.C./Young, J.E. (1987); Sahlman, W.A. (1990), p. 479.
Gompers, P./ Lemer, J. (2001), p. 146
‘Bootstrap’ financing in the 1960s was one form of company acquisition similar to the buyout concept, see e.g., Schmid, H. (1994), pp. 49–50. The second similar form was the phenomenon of going private transactions of small listed companies through a share buyback by the company owners in the 1970s, see Schmid, H. (1994), p. 51.
Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 7; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), p. 31, Schmid, H. (1994), p. 48.
Fenn, G.W./ Liang, N./ Prowse, S. (1997), p. 23.
Baker, G. P./ Montgomery, C.A. (1994), p. 1.
Berger. M. (1993), p. 38; Hoffmann, P./Ramke, R. (1992), p. 23.
Allen, J.R. (1999), p. 708.
Kitching, J. (1989), p. 74.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 39.
Bühner, R. (1990a), p. 143. For more detailed deal information, see Michel, A./Shaked, I. (1991).
Jensen, M.C. (1991), pp. 27–29.
Kaplan, S.N./ Stein, J.C. (1993), p. 313.
Allen, J.R. (1999), p. 712.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2004).
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Thompson, S. (1991), p. 47.
Hoffmann, P./ Ramke, R. (1992), p. 37.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Chiplin, B./ Albrighton, M. (2000), p. 149.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Thompson, S. (1991), pp. 48–49.
Schwien, B. (1995), p. 26.
Schmid, H. (1994), p. 89.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Thompson, S. (1991), p. 53.
Baruch, Y./ Gebbie, D. (1998), pp. 423–424.
Wright, M./ Coyne, J./ Mills, A. (1987), p. 99. However, increasingly larger exit values of buyouts, higher listing costs, and decreasing liquidity at the USM after the stock market crash in 1987 led to a growing number of listings on the LSE, Wright, M./Chiplin, B./Robbie, K. (1989), p. 25.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Chiplin, B./ Albrighton, M. (2000), pp. 156–157.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Thompson, S. (1991), p. 48; Wright, M./Robbie, K./Chiplin, B./Albrighton, M. (2000), p. 154.
Baruch, Y./ Gebbie, D. (1998), p. 424.
Kitching, J. (1989), p. 4.
Wright, M./ Thompson, S./ Robbie, K. (1992), p. 48.
Baruch, Y./ Gebbie, D. (1998), p. 424; Wright, M./Robbie, K./Chiplin, B./Albrighton, M. (2000), pp. 159–160.
Rogers, P./ Holland, T./ Haas, D. (2002), p. 98; Wright, M./Robbie, K./Chiplin, B./Albrighton, M. (2000), p. 161.
CMBOR (2003), pp. 9–10.
Precise data on the German buyout market is very difficult to obtain, mainly due to the lack of an institution for systematic data collection and also the private nature of buyout transactions. SCHMID concludes that at least 173 buyout transactions were closed in Germany by the end of 1992, see Schmid, H. (1994), p. 74.
For more details, see Cable, J. (1985).
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Thompson, S. (1991), p. 48.
For a more detailed overview of reasons, see Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 125–127.
Berger, M. (1993), p. 43; Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 167–170.
Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 187–188.
Forst, M. (1992), pp. 134–135; Luippold, T.L. (1991), p. 123.
Wright, M./ Robbie, K./ Thompson, S. (1991), pp. 50–51.
Gros, S.E. (1998), p. 155; Laub, J. (1995), p. 2. See also Oelsnitz, D. v.d. (1993).
Indahl, R./ Zinterhofer, E. (1998), p. 2.
Luippold, T.L. (1991), pp. 157–159; Neukirchen, D. (1996), p. 13.
Honert, J. (1995), pp. 23–24.
CMBOR (2003), p. 92.
BRAUN develops a model consisting of five factors (i.e., culture/mentality, entrepreneurship, M&A activities, financial markets, law/taxes), which have a significant influence on the development of buyout markets, Braun, C. (1989), pp. 69–73.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Introduction to buyouts. In: German Buyouts Adopting a Buy and Build Strategy. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9634-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9634-3_2
Publisher Name: Gabler
Print ISBN: 978-3-8350-0698-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-9634-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)