Abstract
The rigor-relevance debate in management research has been going on for decades. This entails intense discussions about whether, to what degree and how the methodological soundness of research and relevance in terms of research that matters to practitioners can be combined to achieve management research that matters to academics and practice (Andriessen 2004; Bennis/O’Toole 2005; Tushman/O’Reilly/Fenollosa/Kleinbaum/McGrath 2007). Shapiro et al. (2007) recently showed that most of the Academy of Management members asked in a survey to comment on knowledge transfer problems between practice and academia perceived a rigor-relevance gap in management research. Numerous authors discussed the problem of either focussing mainly on rigor (e.g. Hambrick 1994) or primarily addressing practical relevance (e.g. Vermeulen 2005) and mused about bridging both rigor and relevance in management research (e.g. Tushman/O’Reilly 2007; Varadarajan 2003). Furthermore, special issues of top-tier journals like the Academy of Management Journal in 2001 and 2007 or the British Journal of Management in 2002, as well as academic conferences like the annual meeting of the German Academic Association of Business Research (VHB) in 2007 addressed the “double hurdle” of scholarly quality and relevance (Pettigrew 1997; 2001). However, looking at the outcomes of these discussions, it remains evident that only little progress has been made in terms of how to bridge the gap between academic research and practice (e.g. Gulati 2007).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amabile, T. M.; Patterson, C.; Mueller, J.; Wojcik, T.; Odomirok, P. W.; Marsh, M.; Kramer, S. J.: Academic-Practitioner Collaboration in Management Research: A Case of Cross-Profession Collaboration. In: Academy of Management Journal 44, 2001, S. 418 ff.
Anderson, N.; Herriot, P.; Hodgkinson, G. P.: The Practitioner-researcher Divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) Psychology: Where are we now, and Where do we go from here? In: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74, 2001, S. 391 ff.
Andriessen, D.: Reconciling the Rigor-Relevance Dilemma in Intellectual Capital Research. In: The Learning Organization 11, 2004, S. 393 ff.
Aram, J. D.; Salipante, P. F.: Bridging Scholarship in Management: Epistemological Reflections. In: British Journal of Management 14, 2003, S. 189 ff.
Balogun, J.; Huff, A. S.; Johnson, P.: Three Responses to the Methodological Challenges of Studying Strategizing. In: Journal of Management Studies 40, 2003, S. 197 ff.
Bartunek, J. M.: A Dream for the Academy. In: Academy of Management Review 28, 2003, S. 196 ff.
Bartunek, J. M.; Rynes, S. L.; Ireland, R. D.: What Makes Management Research Interesting, and why Does it Matter? In: Academy of Management Journal 49, 2006, S. 9 ff.
Bennis, W. G.; O’Toole, J.: How Business Schools lost their Way. In: Harvard Business Review 83, 2005, S. 96 ff.
Beyer, J. M.: Introduction to the Special Issue on the Utilization of Organizational Research. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 27, 1982, S. 588 ff.
Bogdan, R.; Taylor, S. J.: Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: Wiley 1975.
Daft, R. L.; Lewin, A. Y.: Perspective: Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies: Idea Migration and Academic Journal Evolution. In: Organization Science 19, 2008, S. 177 ff.
Desouza, K. C.; El Sawy, O. A.; Galliers, R. D.; Loebbecke, C.; Watson, R. T.: Beyond Rigor and Relevance Towards Responsibility and Reverberation: Information Systems Research that Really Matters. In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems 17, 2006, S. 341 ff.
Dodge, J.; Ospina, S. M.; Foldy, E. G.: Integrating Rigor and Relevance in Public Administration Scholarship: The Contribution of Narrative Inquiry. In: Public Administration Review 65, 2005, S. 286 ff.
Easterby-Smith, M.; Thorpe, R.; Lowe, A.: Management Research: An Introduction. 2nd edition, London et al.: Sage 2006.
Ghoshal, S.: Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices. In: Academy of Management Learning and Education 4, 2005, S. 75 ff.
Gulati, R.: Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research. In: Academy of Management Journal 50, 2007, S. 775 ff.
Hambrick, D. C.: What if the Academy Actually Mattered? In: Academy of Management Review 19, 1994, S. 11 ff.
Hodgkinson, G. P.; Herriot, P.; Anderson, N.: Re-aligning the Stakeholders in Management Research: Lessons from Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology. In: British Journal of Management 12, 2001, S. 41 ff.
Hoon, C.: Reformen öffentlicher Verwaltungen – Ein Beitrag zur Strategieprozessforschung. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag 2003.
Hoon, C.: Committees as strategic practice: The Role of Strategic Conversation in a Public Administration. In: Human Relations 60, 2007, S. 921 ff.
Huxham, C.; Vangen, S.: Researching Organizational Practice through Action Research: Case Studies and Design Choices. In: Organizational Research Methods 6, 2003, S. 383 ff.
Jarzabkowski, P.; Balogun, J.; Seidl, D.: Strategizing: The Challenges of a Practice Perspective. In: Human Relations 60, 2007, S. 5 ff.
Kieser, A.; Nicolai, A. T.: Mit der Theorie die wilde Praxis reiten, valleri, vallera, valleri? In: Die Betriebswirtschaft 63, 2003, S. 589 ff.
Kieser, A.; Nicolai, A. T.: Success Factor Research. Overcoming the Trade-off Between Rigor and Relevance? In: Journal of Management Inquiry 14, 2005, S. 275 ff.
Krummaker, S.: Changekompetenzen von Führungskräften. In: Bruch, H.; Vogel, B.; Krummaker, S. (Eds.): Leadership – Best Practices und Trends. Wiesbaden: Gabler 2006, S. 65–74.
Krummaker, S.: Wandlungskompetenz von Führungskräften: Konstrukterschließung-Modellentwicklung-empirische Überprüfung. Wiesbaden: DUV 2007.
Lee, T. W.: Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1999.
McGahan, A. M.: Academic Research that Matters to Managers: On Zebras, Dogs, Lemmings, Hammers, and Turpins. In: Academy of Management Journal 50, 2007, S. 748 ff.
Miles, M. B.; Huberman, A. M.: Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1994.
Nicolai, A. T.: The Bridge to the ‘Real World’: Applied Science or a ‘Schizophrenic Tour de Force’? In: Journal of Management Studies 41, 2004, S. 951 ff.
Patton, M. Q.: Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 2002.
Pettigrew, A. M.: The Double Hurdles for Management Research. In: Clarke T. (Hg.): Advancement in Organizational Behaviour: Essays in Honour of D. S. Pugh. London: Dartmouth Press 1997, S. 277–296.
Pettigrew, A. M.: Management Research after Modernism. In: British Journal of Management 12, 2001, S. 61 ff.
Punch, K. F.: Introduction to Social Research. Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage 2005.
Ridder, H.-G.; Hoon, C.; McCandless, A.: The Theoretical Contribution of Case Study Research to the Field of Strategy and Management. In: Ketchen, D.J.; Bergh, D.D. (Hg.): Research Methodology in Strategy and Management. Volume 5, Oxford: Elsevier 2009.
Rynes, S. L.: Carrying Sumantra Ghoshall’s Torch: Creating More Positive, Relevant, and Ecologically Valid Research. In: Academy of Management Journal 50, 2007, S. 745 ff.
Rynes, S. L.; Bartunek, J. M.; Daft, R. L.: Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfers between Practitioners and Academics. In: Academy of Management Journal 44, 2001, S. 340 ff.
Schiele, H.; Krummaker, S.: Consortial Benchmarking: A Joint Academic-Industry Case Study Research Approach, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference 2008, Anaheim: 2008.
Shamir, B.; Pillai, R.; Bligh, M. C.; Uhl-Bien, M. (Eds.): Follower-Centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of James R. Meindl. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing 2007.
Shapiro, D. L.; Krikman, B. L.; Courtney, H. G.: Perceived Causes and Solutions of the Translation Problem in Management Research. In: Academy of Management Journal 50, 2007, S. 249 ff.
Shrivastava, P.: Rigor and Practical Usefulness of Research in Strategic Management. In: Strategic Management Journal 8, 1987, S. 77 ff.
Shrivastava, P.; Mitroff, II.: Enhancing Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers’ Assumptions. In: Academy of Management Review 9, 1984, S. 18 ff.
Sigglekow, N.: Persuasion with Case Studies. In: Academy of Management Journal 50, 2007, S. 20 ff.
Silverman, D.: Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage 2006.
Simon, H. A.: The Business School: A Problem in Organizational Design. In: Simon, H. A. ( Hg.): Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Free Press 1976, S. 1–16.
Starkey, K.; Madan, P.: Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research. In: British Journal of Management 12, 2001, S. 233 ff.
Strauss, A. L.; Corbin, J. M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage 1998.
Sutton, R. I.; Pfeffer, J.: Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-Based Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press 2006.
Taylor, L. A.; Goodwin, V. L.; Cosier, R. A.: Method Myopia: Real or Imagined? In: Journal of Management Inquiry 12, 2003, S. 255 ff.
Tushman, M.; O’Reilly, C.: Research and Relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s Quadrant for Doctoral Programs and Faculty Development. In: Academy of Management Journal 50, 2007, S. 769 ff.
Tushman, M.; O’Reilly, C.; Fenollosa, A.; Kleinbaum, A. M.; McGrath, D.: Relevance and Rigor: Executive Education as a Lever in Shaping Practice and Research. In: Academy of Management Learning & Education 6, 2007, S. 345 ff.
Van de Ven, A. H.; Johnson, P. E.: Knowledge for Theory and Practice. In: Academy of Management Review 31, 2006, S. 802 ff.
Varadarajan, P. R.: Musings on Relevance and Rigor of Scholarly Research in Marketing. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 31, 2003, S. 368 ff.
Vermeulen, F.: On Rigor and Relevance: Fostering Dialectic Progress in Management Research. In: Academy of Management Journal 48, 2005, S. 978 ff.
Vermeulen, F.: “I Shall not Remain Insignificant”: Adding a Second Loop to Matter more. In: Academy of Management Journal 50, 2007, S. 754 ff.
Weick, K. E.: Gapping the Relevance Bridge: Fashions Meet Fundamentals in Management Research. In: British Journal of Management 12, 2001, S. 71 ff.
Whitley, R.: The Scientific Status of Management Research as a Practically-Oriented Social Science. In: Journal of Management Studies 21, 1984, S. 369 ff.
Whittington, R.: The Work of Strategizing and Organizing: For a Practice Perspective. In: Strategic Organization 1, 2003, S. 117 ff.
Yin, R. K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 2003.
Yukl, G.: Leadership in Organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson 2006.
Zell, D.: Pressure for Relevancy at Top-Tier Business Schools. In: Journal of Management Inquiry 14, 2005, S. 271 ff.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoon, C., Krummaker, S. (2009). The Quest for Relevance: Management Research that Matters to Academics and Practitioners. In: Scherer, A.G., Kaufmann, I.M., Patzer, M. (eds) Methoden in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9473-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9473-8_12
Publisher Name: Gabler
Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-1524-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-9473-8
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)