Structuring Ambidextrous Organizations: Exploitation and Exploration as a Key for Long-Term Success

Argyris, C. 1977. Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5): 115-125.Google Scholar

Beckman, C. M. 2006. The Influence of Founding Team Company Affilations on Firm Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 741-758.Google Scholar

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. 2003. Eploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 238-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, T., & Stalker, G. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Bushe, G. R., & Shani, A. B. 1988. A Review of the Literature on the Use of Parallel Learning Structure Interventions in Bureaucratic Organizations. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 258-262.Google Scholar

Christensen, C.M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail illustrated edition. Mcgraw-Hill Professional, Columbus.Google Scholar

Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. 1994. Companies need not hire outside CEOs to stimulate fundamental change. Directorship, 19(9): 8-10.Google Scholar

D’Aveni, R. A. 1994. Hypercompetition. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar

Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J.E. 1986. The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science, 32(11): 1422-1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, R. B. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. Slevin (Eds.): The management of organization (pp. 167-188). North-Holland, New York.Google Scholar

Farjaudon, A., & Saulerot, M. 2006. Les implications du dilemme exploitation / exploration sur le contrôle de gestion: le cas d’une entreprise de produits de grande consommation. Research Paper.Google Scholar

Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. 2000. Strategizing throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewals. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 154-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, R. N., & Kaplan, S. 2001. Creative destruction. New Yersey, Financial Times Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Gibson, C.B., & Birkinshaw, J. 2004. The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 209-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, S. G. 1985. Organizational Dualism and Quality Circles. Academy of Management Review, 10(3): 504-517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4): 375-387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hage, J. T. 1999. Organizational Innovation and Organizational Change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 597-622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hambrick, D. C. 1983. Some Tests of the Effectiveness and Functional Attributes of Miles and Snow’s Strategic Types. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1): 5-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

He, Z., Wong. 2004. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4): 481-494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jansen, J. 2005. Ambidextrous Organizations - A Multiple-level Study of Absorptive Capacity, Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation, and Performance. NL: Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Yan Ling, & Veiga, J.F. 2006. Ambidexterity and Performance in Smallto Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32(5): 646-672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and Exploitaiton in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D. & Coleman, J. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 546-562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Reilly, M. L., & Tushman, C. A. 2004. The Ambidextrous Organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4): 74-81.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, M. L., & Tushman, C. A. 2007. Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Research Paper.Google Scholar

Peters, T. J., & Waterman Jr., R. H.1982. How the best-run companies turn so-so performers into big winners. Management Review, 71(11): 8-16.Google Scholar

Prahalad, C. 1998. Growth strategies. Executive Excellence, 15(1): 6-7.Google Scholar

Raisch, S. 2008. Balanced Structures: Designing Organizations for Profitable Growth. Long Range Planning, 41(5): 483-508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3): 375-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. & Tushman, M. L. 2009. Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science, 20(4): 685-695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raisch, S., Probst, G. & Gomez, P. 2007. Wege zum Wachstum: Wie Sie nachhaltigen Unternehmenserfolg erzielen 1. Aufl. Gabler, Betriebswirt.-Vlg, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. 2005. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams. Organization Science, 16(5): 522-536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. 1986. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3): 439-465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. 1996. Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 38(4): 8-30.Google Scholar

Tushman, M. L., Smith, W. K., Wood, R. C., Westerman, G., & O’Reilly, C. 2006. Organizational Desings and Innovation Streams. Research Paper.Google Scholar

Vanhaverbeke, W., & Peeters, N. 2005. Embracing Innovation as Strategy: Corporate Venturing, Competence Building and Corporate Strategy Making. Creativity & Innovation Management, 14(3): 246-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Volberda, H. W. 1996. Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments. Organization Science, 7(4): 359-374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W. 2002. Sustained Competitive Advantage: Temporal Dynamics and the Incidence and Persistence of Superior Economic Performance. Organization Science, 13(1): 82-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zand, D. 1974. Collateral Organization: A New Change Strategy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10(1): 63-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar