Skip to main content
  • 1085 Accesses

Abstract

Global teams facilitate the implementation of strategic initiatives within multinational corporations. Through their efforts in piloting strategic initiatives, they influence the adoption decision of global strategic initiatives. In this article, we will argue that the team’s piloting influences commitment to change among the subsidiaries following the initial pilot location through pilot goal setting and the formal and informal feedback mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burgelman, R., & Grove, A. 2007. Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos – repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 965-979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. 1996. Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decisionmaking effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): 368-396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. 2001. Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 716-736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. 1995. Building the entrepreneurial organizations: the new organizational processes, the new managerial tasks. European Management Journal, 13(2): 139-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. 1998. Performance, aspirations and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1): 58-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. 2002. Commitment to organizational change: extension of a threecomponents model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3): 474-487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., & Novicevic, M. M. 2002. The co-ordination of strategic initiatives within global organizations: the role of global teams. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(4): 660-676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. J., & Szulanski, G. 2007. Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Science, 53: 1716-1730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. J., Szulanski, G., & Casaburi, M. V. 2003. Templates and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Proceedings (00650668): HH1-HH6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 2006. Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3): 201-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Srinivas, E., Lal, J., & Topolnytsky, L. 2007. Employee commitment and support for an organizational change: Test of the three-component model in two cultures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2): 185-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V., & Ingram, P. 1998. Embeddedness and beyond: Institutions, exchange and social structure. In Brinton, M. & Nee, V. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in sociology (pp. 1-16). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belnap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajiv, N., Hambrick, D., & Chen, M. 2007. What is strategic management really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9): 935-955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, A. 2007. Incremental organizational learning from multilevel information sources: Evidence for cross-level interactions. Organizational Science, 18(2): 233-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (winter special issue): 27-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. & Jensen, R. 2006. Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (10): 937-957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4): 464-476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Büchel, B., Davidson, R. (2010). Adoption of Strategic Initiatives: The Role of Global Teams during Piloting. In: More than Bricks in the Wall: Organizational Perspectives for Sustainable Success. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8945-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics