Skip to main content
  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

"Better! Cheaper! Faster!" is a battle cry in today's economy that sounds across many lines of businesses, from the investors' desks through executive management levels down to operational projects (Brandon 2006, p. 4). The three cardinal challenges of this objective are depicted in the structure of the "triple constraint" triangle illustrated in Figure I-1 (Rosenau 1981, pp.15–18). Some difficulties, however, arise from the dynamics of the "triple constraint", from the challenges associated with achieving all three dependent conditions simultaneously: "Unfortunately, the Triple Constraint is very difficult to satisfy because most of what occurs during a project conspires to pull the performance below specification and to delay the project so it falls behind schedule, which makes it exceed the budget." (Rosenau 1981, p. 15).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alper, P.; Grob, H.; Weimann, P.; Winter, R. (2008), Anwendungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik. Strategische Planung, Entwickung and Nutzung von Informations- und Kommumikationssystemen,5th edn, Vieweg, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C; Bunse, C; Groβ, H.; Kühne, T. (2002), "Towards a general component model for Web-based applications",Annals of Software Engineering, 13 (1): 35–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggerstaff, T.; Richter, C (1987), “Reusability framework, assessment, and directions”, IEEE Software, 4 (2): 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. (1986), Wirtschaftliche Software-Produtaion, Forkel, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, D. (2006), Project management for modern information systems, IRM Press, Hershey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, F. (1987), "No sliver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering", IEEE Computer. 20 (4): 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (2000), Large-scale, component-based development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzoglou, P. (1997), “Factors affecting completion of the requirements capture stage of projects with different characteristics”, Information and Software Technology, 39 (9): 627–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco, T. (1997), Warum ist Software so teuer? Und andere Rätsel des Informationszeitalters, Hanser, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, O.; Nygaard, K. (1966), “SIMULA – an ALGOL-based simulation language”, Communications of the ACM, 9 (9): 671–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, E. (1972), “The humble programmer”, Communications of the ACM, 15 (10): 859–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferstl, O.; Sinz, E. (2008), Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 6th edn, Oldenbourg, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröschle, H.; Reinheimer, S. (eds) (2007), “Serviceorientierte Architekturen”, HMD - Praxis der Wirtschaftsinfomatik, 43 (253).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garlan, D.; Allen, R.; Ockerbloom, J. (1995), “Architectural mismatch: Why reuse is so hard”, IEEE Software, 12 (6): 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, R. (1996), “Study supports existence of software crisis: Management issues appear to be prime cause”, Journal of Systems and Software, 32 (3): 83–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, R. (2005),“’Silver bullet’ milestones in software history”, Communications of the ACM, 48 (8): 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, R. (2006), “Looking into the challenges of complex IT projects”, Communications of the ACM, 49 (11): 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H.; Neumann, G. (2009), Wirschaftsinformatik 1: Grundlagen und Anwendung, 10th edn, Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.; Heinzl, A.; Roithmayr, F. (2007), Wirtschaftsinformatik: Einführung und Grundlegung,3rd edn, Oldenbourg, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L.; Lehner, F. (2005), Informationsmanagement. 8th edn, Oldenbourg, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J.; Venkatraman, N. (1993), “Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations”,IBM Systems Journal, 32 (1): 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R.; Chang, C. (1994), “How to solve the management crisis”, IEEE Software, 11 (6): 14–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, P.; Bodendorf, F.; König, W.; Picot, A.; Schumann, M.; Hess, T. (2005), Grundzüge der Wirtschaftsinformatik; 9th edn, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (1990), Objektorientierte Softwareentwicklung, Hanser, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mili, H.; Mili, F.; Mili, A. (1995), “Reusing software: Issues and research directions”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21 (6): 528–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1965), “Cramming more components onto integrated circuits”, Electronics Magazine, 38 (8): 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naur, P.; Randell, B. (Hrsg.) (1969), Software engineering: Report on a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, NATO Scientific Affairs Division, Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neighbors, J. (1984), “The draco approach to constructing software from reusable components”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10 (5):564–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, E. (1998), “Ein Multipfad-Vorgehensmodell für die Entwicklung von Informationssystemen–dargestellt am Beispiel von Workflow-Management Anwendungen”, Wirtschaftsinformatik, 40 (4): 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overhage, S. (2006), “Vereinheitlichte Spezifikation von Komponenten: Grundlagen, UnSCom Spezifikationsrahmen und Anwendung”, Dissertation, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overhage, S.; Turowski, K. (2008), “Ingenieurmäβige Entwicklung von Komponenten, Services und Anwendungssystemen: Zum Aufbau einer Konstruktionslehre für die (Wirtschafts-)Informatik”, in Heinemann, E. (ed.), Anwendungsinformatik: Die Zukunft des Enterprise Engineering, Nomos, Baden-Baden: 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G.; Beitz, W.; Feldhusen, J.; Grote, K. (2003), Konstruktionslehre: Grundlagen erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung: Methoden und Anwendung, 5th edn, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnas, D. (1985), “Software aspects of strategic defense systems”, Communications of the ACM, (28) 12: 1326–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potok, T., Vouk, M.; Rindos, A. (1999), “Productivity analysis of object-oriented software developed in a commercial environment”, Software Practice and Experience, 29 (10): 833–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, J. (1997), Measuring software reuse: Principles, practices, and economic models, Addison Wesley, Reading, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. (1998), “The cathedral and the bazaar”, First Monday, 3 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, M. (1981), Successful project management: A step-by-step approach with practical examples, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (1997), “Wiederverwendbare Software”, Wirtschaftsinformatik, 39 (4): 357–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, J.; Blaha, M.; Premerlami, W.; Eddy, F.; Lorensen, W (1993), Objektorientiertes Modellieren und Entwerfen, Hanser, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackman, H.; Erikson, W.; Grant, E. (1968), “Exploratory experimental studies comparing online and offline programming performance”, Communications of the ACM, (11) 1: 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sametinger, J. (1997), Software engineering with reusable components, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, R. (1996), “’Service oriented’ architectures, part 2”, Gartner Research ID Number SPA-401-069, Gartner, Stamford, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, R.; Natis, Y. (1996), “’Service oriented’ architectures, part 1”, Gartner Research ID Number SPA-401-068, Gartner, Stamford, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, I. (2001), Software engineering, 6th edn, Pearson, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szyperski, C. (1998), Component software: Beyond object-oriented programming, Addison Wesley, Harlow, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, A. (2006), “IT/business alignment”, Wirtschaftsinformatik, 48 (5): 368–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turowski, K. (2003), Fachkamponenten: Komponentenbasierte betriebliche Anwendungssysteme, Shaker, Aachen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. (2001), “Faster, better, and cheaper”, IEEE Software, 18 (3): 96–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassermann, A.; Gutz, S. (1982), “The future of programming”, Communications of the ACM, 25 (3): 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2009), “Observable universe”, accessed on 17 Jul 2009, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe.

  • Wissenschaftliche Kommission Wirtschaftsinformatik (1994), “Profil der Wirtschaftsinformatik”, Wirtschaftsintormatik, 36 (1): 80–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissenschaftliche Kommission Wirtschaftsinformatik (2003), Rahmenempfehlung für die Universitätsausbildung in wirtschaftsinformatik, Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skroch, O. (2010). Introduction. In: Developing Business Application Systems. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8858-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics