Discussion – Findings from Cross-Case Analysis and Beyond

  • Matthias Daub


We find initial support for most of our propositions. However, we need to adapt those propositions that assume a relationship between network embeddedness and technocratic coordination. Based on our empirical results, there is no support for the proposition that assumes a positive relationship between strategic relevance and autonomy. With regard to specific coordination mechanisms, we find that autonomy generally does not seem to play a very important role. Transfers are hardly used, most likely because of their high cost, which is especially relevant in cost-sensitive service offshoring situations. Personal coordination is found not only to play an important role for coordination itself but also to be a complement to other mechanisms. Despite minor adaptations, we consider our typology initially supported by our findings.


Physical Distance Local Network Coordination Mechanism Output Control Service Factory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Daub

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations