Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Verhalten in Organisationen pp 67–101Cite as

Statusverhalten in der Organisation im Spannungsverhältnis von formaler und informaler Hierarchie

  • Chapter

  • 6437 Accesses

Part of the book series: Managementforschung ((MGTF,volume 19))

Zusammenfassung

Die Organisationsforschung setzte Status bisher weitgehend mit der durch die Hierarchie vorgegebenen Position gleich. Entsprechend wurde das mit Status verbundene Verhalten kaum erforscht. Der Beitrag führt Statusverhalten als eigenständiges Organisationales Verhaltenskonstrukt ein und grenzt es von verwandten Konzepten ab. Statusverhalten wird als Erklärung für die Entstehung informaler, sozialer Hierarchien und für die Besetzung von Positionen in formalen Organisationshierarchien postuliert. Dieser Zusammenhang wird moderiert durch den Grad der Formatierung der Hierarchie, durch deren Veränderlichkeit („Liminalität”) und durch die Tiefe der Hierarchie. Vermittelt über die Hierarchie beeinflusst Statusverhalten auch den Gebrauch von Machtbasen in der Organisation. Weiters werden mögliche personale Dispositionen als Vorbedingungen für Statusverhalten argumentiert. Der Beitrag schließt mit einer Diskussion der empirischen Überprüfung und der weiteren Implikationen des Statusverhaltens für die Organisation.

Abstract

Organizational research considers status traditionally as being determined through the hierarchical position. Behaviours which are motivated through aiming at status have been largely ignored. The paper introduces status behaviour as a construct for the description of organizational behaviours, and its distinctness to related constructs is discussed. The paper aims to show that status behaviour contributes to the explanation of organizational phenomena, such as the emergence of social, informal hierarchies and the assignment of persons to positions within the formal organizational hierarchy. A model is elaborated which introduces the degree of formalization of hierarchies, their instability (liminality), and their depth as moderator variables for the status behaviour-hierarchy relationship. Furthermore, through its impact on the hierarchy, status behaviour also influences the use of bases of power. Personal dispositions are introduced as antecedents of status behaviour. The paper concludes with a discussion of the empirical validation of the model and of major implications of status behaviours for other organizational phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Adler, P.S./Kwon, S.-W. (2002): Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. In: Academy of Management Review 27, S. 17-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C. (2004): Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy. In: Sociological Theory 22, S. 527-573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W.A. (1946): Family Social Participation and Social Status Self-Ratings. In: American Sociological Review 11, S. 253-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles (1980): Rhetorik. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S.E. (1952): Opinions and Social Pressure. In: Scientific American 193, S. 31-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F. (1976): Interaction Process Analysis. In: Hollander, E.P./Hunt, R.G. (Hrsg.): Current Perspectives in Social Psychology. London, S. 386-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J./Gleadle, P./Hailey, V.H./Willmott, H. (2005): Managing Change Across Boundaries: Boundary-Shaking Practices. In: British Journal of Management 16, S. 261-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Smullyan, E. (1944): Status, Status Types, and Status Interrelations. In: American Sociological Review 9, S. 151-161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, J.L./Martorana, P. (2006): Effects of Power on Emotion and Expression during a Controversial Group Discussion. In: European Journal of Social Psychology 36, S. 497-509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J./Conner, T.L./Fisek, M.H. (1974): Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J./Fisek, M.H./Norman, R.Z./Zelditch, M. (1977): Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J./Fisek, M.H. (2006): Diffuse Status Characteristics and the Spread of Status Value: A Formal Theory. In: American Journal of Sociology 111, S. 1038-1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J./Webster, M.J./Ridgeway C.L./Rosenholtz, S.J. (1998): Status Cues, Expectations, and Behavior. In: Berger, J./Zelditch, M.J. (Hrsg.): Status, Power, and Legitimacy. New Brunswick, S. 155-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M.C. (1999): Citizenship and Impression Management: Good Soldiers or Good Actors? In: Academy of Management Review 24, S. 82-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A./Granger, D.A./Mazur, A./Kivlighan, K.T. (2006): Testosterone and Social Behavior. In: Social Forces 85, S. 167-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1982): Die feinen Unterschiede. Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992): Rede und Antwort. Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993): Sozialer Sinn. Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C.I./Church, M.A./Fraser, L. (1986): Effects of the Duration of Eye Contact on Judgements of Personality Characteristics. In: Journal of Social Psychology 126, S. 71-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G./Lawrence, T.B./Robinson, S.L. (2005): Territoriality in Organizations. In: Academy of Management Review 30, S. 577-594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (2005): Brokerage and Closure. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B.J. (1977): An Attribution Theory of Leadership. In: Staw, B.M./Salancik, G.R. (Hrsg.): New Directions in Organizational Behavior. Chicago, S. 179-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronshaw, S.F./Lord, R.G. (1987): Effects of Categorization, Attribution, and Encoding Processes on Leadership Perceptions. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 72, S. 97-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B./Mazza, C. (2003): Consulting as a Liminal Space. In: Human Relations 56, S. 267-290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R./Lengel, R.H. (1986): Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Statural Design. In: Management Science 32, S. 554-571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D.V./Unckless, A.L./Schleicher, D.J./Hiller, N.J. (2002): Self-Monitoring Personality at Work: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Construct Validity. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 87, S. 390-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, B.H./Moberg, D.J. (1986): Communicating Influence Attempts in Dyads: Linguistic Sedatives and Palliatives. In: Academy of Management Review 11, S. 567-584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, K.K. (1994): In the Eyes of the Beholder: An Attributional Approach to Ingra-tiation and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. In: Academy of Management Journal 37, S. 1379-1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eby, L.T./Cader, J./Noble, C.L. (2003): Why do High Self-Monitors Emerge as Leaders in Small Groups? A Comparative Analysis of the Behaviors of High Versus Low Self-Monitors. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33, S. 1457-1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D. (1991): Applying Impression Management to Create Productive Self-Fulfilling Prophecies at Work. In: Giacalone, R.A./Rosenfeld, P. (Hrsg.): Applied Impression Management. Newbury Park, S. 13-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt, A. (2006): Die ökonomische und organisatorische Relevanz von Status: Eine Untersuchung des Strebens nach höherem Status und des Einflusses von Statusdifferenzen auf die Zusammenarbeit. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation. Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg. Freiberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisbach, K.D./Kramer, R.M. (1996): Members’ Responses to Orgnanizational Identity Threats. Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 14, S. 442-476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erber, R./Fiske, S.T. (1984): Outcome Dependency and Attention to Inconsistent Information. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, S. 709-726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, B./Lind, E.A./Johnson, B.C./O’Barr, W.M. (1978): Speech Style and Impression Formation in a Court Setting: The Effects of ’Powerful’ and ’Powerless’ Speech. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14, S. 266-279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D.C./Klich, N.R. (1991): Impression Management and Career Strategies. In: Giacalone, R.A./Rosenfeld, P. (Hrsg.): Applied Impression Management. Newbury Park, S. 67-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D.C./Weitz, B.A. (1991): From the Invisible Hand to the Gladhand: Understanding a Careerist Orientation to Work. In: Human Resource Management 30, S. 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G.R./King, T.R./Judge, T.A./Kacmar, K.M. (1991): The Management of Shared Meaning in Organizations. In: Giacalone, R.A./Rosenfeld, P. (Hrsg.): Applied Impression Management. Newbury Park, S. 41-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F.E. (1967): A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. (1996): Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (1985): The Demand for Non-Observable and Other Non-Positional Goods. In: American Economic Review 75, S. 101-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J.P.R./Raven, B. (1959): The Basis of Social Power. In: Cartwright, D. (Hrsg.): Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, S. 150-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1964): A Structural Theory of Aggression. In: Journal of Peace Research 1, S. 95-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gane, N. (2005): Max Weber as Social Theorist. Class, Status, Party. In: European Journal of Social Theory 8, S. 211-226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1995): Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W.L./Avolio, B.J. (1998): The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective. In: Academy of Management Review 23, S. 32-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennep, A. v. (1999/1909): Übergangsriten. Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R.A./Rosenfeld, P. (Hrsg.)(1991): Applied Impression Management. How Image-Making Affects Managerial Decisions. Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A./Sims, H.P. (1983): Perceptions of Managerial Power as a Consequence of Managerial Behavior and Reputation. In: Journal of Management 9, S. 7-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel, M./Ortmann, G./Weber, C. (2007): Reziprozität. In: Schreyögg, G./Sydow, J. (Hrsg.): Managementforschung 17. Wiesbaden, S. 161-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959): The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, I.W. (1957): Status Consistency and Preference for Change in Power Distribution. In: American Sociological Review 22, S. 275-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund, C. (2001): Zum Signalcharakter unterschiedlicher Wege der Stellenfindung. In: Die Betriebswirtschaft 61, S. 519-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg, E. (1975): Einführung in die Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.T. (1963): A System for the Notion of Proxemic Behavior. In: American Anthropologist 65, S. 1003-1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.J./Workman, J.W./Marchioro, C.A. (1998): Sex, Task, and Behavioral Flexibility. Effects on Leadership Perceptions. In: Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 74, S. 1-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, D.N.D./Verburg, R.M. (1997): Charisma and Rhetoric: Communicative Techniques of International Business Leaders. In: Leadership Quarterly 8, S. 354-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinicke, C./Bales, R.E. (1953): Developmental Trends in the Structure of Small Groups. In: Sociometry 16, S. 7-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, D.J./Astley W.G./Butler, R.J./Wilson, D.C. (1981): Organization as Power. In: Cummings, L.L./Staw, B.M. (Hrsg.): Research in Organizational Behavior. London, S. 151-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.A./Abrams, D. (1988): Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Inter-group Relations and Group Processes. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtgraves, T./Lasky B. (1999): Linguistic Power and Persuasion. In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18, S. 196-205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosman, L.A./Siltanen, S.A. (2006): Powerful and Powerless Language Forms: Their Consequences for Impression Formation, Attributions of Control of Self and Control of Others, Cognitive Responses, and Message Memory. In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology 25, S. 33-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R.J./Woycke, J./Fodor, E.M. (1988): Charismatic and Non-Charismatic Leaders: Differences in Behavior and Effectiveness. In: Conger, J.A./Kanungo, R.N. (Hrsg.): Charismatic Leadership: The Elusive Factor in Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco, S. 98-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E.C. (1945): Dilemmas and Contradictions of Status. In: American Journal of Sociology 50, S. 353-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irle, M. (1971): Macht und Entscheidungen in Organisationen. Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, W.K. (2004): Status Seeking and Social Welfare: Is there Virtue in Vanity? In: Social Science Quarterly 85, S. 361-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Stenman, O./Martinsson, P. (2006): Honestly, Why are You Driving a BMW? In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60, S. 129-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K. (1981): Impro. Improvisation and the Theatre. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.E. (1964): Ingratiation. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.E./Davis, K.E. (1965): From Acts to Dispositions: The Attribution Process in Person Perception. In: Berkowitz, L. (Hrsg.): Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. New York, S. 219-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.O. (1975): Field Study of the Relationship between Status Discrepancy and Proxemic Behavior. In: Journal of Social Psychology 97, S. 73-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H.H. (1971): Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behaviour. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, K.C./Orlikowski, W.J./Yates, J. (2006): Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations. In: Organization Science 17, S. 22-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S./Jermier, J.M. (1978): Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 22, S. 375-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M./Day, D.V. (1994): Do Chameleons Get Ahead? The Effects of Self-Monitoring on Managerial Careers. In: Academy of Management Journal 37, S. 1047-1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D./Roberts, J. (1982): The Power of Organization or the Organization of Power? In: Organization Studies 3, S. 47-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowner, R./Wiseman, R. (2003): Culture and Status-Related Behavior: Japanes and American Perceptions of Interaction in Asymmetric Dyads. In: Cross-Cultural Research 37, S. 178-210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, H.T./Goffin, R.D./McCarthy J.M./Rothstein, M.G./Johnston, N. (2006): Comparing the Validity of Structured Interviews for Managerial-Level Employees: Should We Look to the Past or Focus on the Future? In: Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 79, S. 411-432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, I./Meyersson Milgrom, E.M. (2006): Status, Relative Pay, and Wage Growth: Evidence from M&A. Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, R. (2004): Informelle Organisation. In: Schreyögg,G./Werder, A.v. (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch der Organisation. Stuttgart, S. 497-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary M.R./Kowalski, R.M. (1990): Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. In: Psychological Bulletin 107, S. 34-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. (1997): When the Going Gets Tough, do the Tough Ask for Help? Help Seeking and Power Motivation in Organizations. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72, S. 336-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, J.M. (2002): Metaphors, Stories and Models: A Unified Account of Decisions: Part 1: Making Sense of the Decision Context. In: Reason in Practice 2, S. 11-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, J.M./Ötsch, W. (2006): Jenseits der Hierarchie. Status im beruflichen Alltag bewußt gestalten. Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, G.E. (1954): Status Crystallization: A Non-Vertical Dimension of Social Status. In: American Sociological Review 19, S. 405-413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loch, C.H./Huberman, B.A./Stout, S. (2000): Status Competition and Performance in Work Groups. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 43, S. 35-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R.G./Foti, R.J./DeVader, C.L. (1984): A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions. In: Organisational Behavior and Human Performance 34, S. 343-378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F./Youssef, C.M. (2007): Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior. In: Journal of Management 33, S. 321-349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1990/1950): Die Gabe. Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. (1978): Macht als Motiv. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, B. (1990): A Theory of Signalling During Job Search, Employment Efficiency, and ’Stigmatised’ Jobs. In: Review of Economic Studies 57, S. 299-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A./Schenkel, M.T. (2008): The Price Chameleons Pay: Self-Monitoring, Boundary Spanning and Role Conflict in the Workplace. In: British Journal of Management 19, S. 138-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1969): Significance of Posture and Position in Communication of Attitude and Status Relationship. In: Psychological Bulletin 71, S. 359-372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1968): The Matthew Effect in Science. In: Science 159, S. 56-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metiu, A. (2006): Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups. In: Organization Science 17, S. 418-435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignault, A./Chaudhuri, A. (2003): The Many Faces of a Neutral Face: Head Tilt and Perception of Dominance and Emotion. In: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27, S. 111-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1985): The Organization as Political Arena. In: Journal of Management Studies 22, S. 133-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand, D.A. (1996): Dominance, Deference, and Egalitarianism in Organizational Interaction: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Power and Politeness. In: Organization Science 7, S. 544-566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummenday, H.D. (1995): Psychologie der Selbstdarstellung. Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, A. (2002): Inter-Group Helping Relations as Power Relations: Maintaining or Challenging Social Dominance between Groups through Helping. In: Journal of Social Issues 58, S. 487-502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass, A./McEwen, H. (2004): Exploring Consumer Status and Conspicuous Consumption. In: Journal of Consumer Behaviour 4, S. 25-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G./Sydow, J. (1999): Grenzmanagement in Unternehmensnetzwerken: Theoretische Zugänge. In: Die Betriebswirtschaft 59, S. 205-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeck, J.R./Tiedens, L.Z./Brion, S. (2006): The Powerful Want to, the Powerless have to: Perceived Constraint Moderates Causal Attributions. In: European Journal of Social Psychology 36, S. 479-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, D.A./Sutton, R.I. (2001): Status Contests in Meetings: Negotiating the Informal Order. In: Turner, M. E. (Hrsg.): Groups at Work. Theory and Research. Mahwah, S. 299-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, S.R./Siltanen, S.A./Hosman, L.A./Langenderfer, J. (2002): Employment Interview Outcomes and Speech Style Effects. In: Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21, S. 144-161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J.L. (2001): Less Epistemology, More Government and Social Status. In: Human Relations 54, S. 85-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirö, J.M./Meliä, J.L. (2003): Formal and Informal Interpersonal Power in Organisations: Testing a Bifactorial Model of Power in Role-Sets. In: Applied Psychology: An International Review 52, S. 1-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981): Power in Organizations. Marshfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny J.M. (1993): A Status-Based Model of Market Competition. In: American Journal of Sociology 98, S. 829-872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny J.M. (1994): Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 39, S. 458-483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M. (2005): Status Signals. A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M./Baron, J.N. (1997): Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace. In: American Sociological Review 62, S. 673-693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J.M./Stuart, T.E./Hannan, M.T. (1996): Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: A Sociological Examination of Worldwide Competition in the Semiconductor Industry. In: American Journal of Sociology 102, S. 659-689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D.S./Hickson, D.J. (1968): Eine dimensionale Analyse bürokratischer Strukturen. In: Mayntz, R. (Hrsg.): Bürokratische Organisation. Köln, S. 82-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravlin, E.C./Thomas, D.C. (2005): Status and Stratification Processes in Organizational Life. In: Journal of Management 31, S. 966-987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M.I. (1996): Expert Power and Control in Late Modernity: An Empirical Review and Theoretical Synthesis. In: Organisational Studies 17, S. 573-597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rege, M. (2008): Why Do People Care About Social Status. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 66, S. 233-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remland, M. (1981): Developing Leadership Skills in Nonverbal Communication: A Situational Perspective. In: Journal of Business Communication 18, S. 18-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K.D./Cialdini, R.B. (1981): Basking and Blasting: Tactics of Indirect Self-Presentation. In: Tedeschi, J.T. (Hrsg.): Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. New York, S. 41-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C.L./Erickson, K.G. (1999): Creating and Spreading Status Beliefs. In: American Journal of Sociology 106, S. 579-615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C.L./Smith-Lovin, L. (1999): The Gender System and Interaction. In: Annual Review of Sociology 25, S. 191-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, A./Trout, J. (1982): Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V.P./Pollock, T.G./Hayward, M.L.A. (2006): Celebrity Firms: The Social Construction of Market Popularity. In: Academy of Management Review 31, S. 50-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L.M. (2005): Changing Faces: Professional Image Construction in Diverse Organizational Settings. In: Academy of Management Review 30, S. 685-711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D.T. (2001): Getting a Laugh: Gender, Status, and Humor in Task Discussions. In: Social Forces 80, S. 123-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J.B. (1966): General Expectations for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement. In: Psychological Monographs 80, S. 1-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samra-Fredericks, D. (2004): Managerial Elites Making Rhetorical and Linguistic Moves for a Moving (Emotional) Display. In: Human Relations 57, S. 1103-1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauder, M. (2005): Symbols and Contexts: An Interactionist Approach to the Study of Social Status. In: Sociological Quarterly 46, S. 279-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2004): The Paradox of Choice. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, H.B. (1986): The Meeting as a Neglected Social Form in Organizational Studies. In: Staw, B.M./Cummings. L.L. (Hrsg.): Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 8. Greenwich, S. 233-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1998): Der flexible Mensch. Die Kultur des neuen Kapitalismus. 6. Aufl. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B./Arthur, M.B./House, R.J. (1994): The Rhetoric of Charismatic Leadership: A Theoretical Extension, a Case Study and Implications for Research. In: Leadership Quarterly 5, S. 25-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillince, J.A.A. (2000): Rhetorical Power, Accountability and Conflict in Committees: An Argumentation Approach. In: Journal of Management Studies 37, S. 1125-1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillince, J.A.A. (2002): A Model of the Strength and Appropriateness of Argumentation in Organizational Contexts. In: Journal of Management Studies 39 (5), S. 585-618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillince, J.A.A. (2005): A Contingency Theory of Rhetorical Congruence. In: Academy of Management Review 30 (3), S. 608-621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B./Oakes, P. (2006): Beyond Dependence: An Identity Approach to Social Power and Domination. In: Human Relations 59, S. 105-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B./Walker, H.A. (2002): Status Characteristics and Performance Expectations: A Reformulation. In: Sociological Theory 20, S. 24-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1974): Self-Monitoring of Expressive Behavior. In: Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 30, S. 526-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973): Job Market Signaling. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, S. 355-374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G.P./Form, W.H. (1953): Instabilities in Status: The Problem of Hierarchy in the Community Study of Status Arrangements. In: American Sociological Review 18, S. 149-161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J.J./Albrecht, T.L./Taylor, S. (1990): Process, Organizational, Relational, and Personal Determinants of Managerial Compliance-Gaining Communication Strategies. In: Journal of Business Communication 27, S. 331-355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1994): Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men in the Workplace: Language, Sex, and Power. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J.T. (Hrsg.) (1981): Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J.T./Melburg, V. (1984): Impression Management and Influence in the Organization. In: Bacharach, S.B. /Lawler, E.J. (Hrsg.): Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Vol. 3. Greenwich, S. 31-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J.T./Riess, M. (1981): Identities, the Phenomenal Self, and Laboratory Research. In: Tedeschi, J.T. (Hrsg.): Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research. New York, S. 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedens, L./Ellsworth, P.C./Mesquita, B. (2000): Sentimental Stereotypes: Emotional Expectation for High- and Low-Status Group Members. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, S. 560-575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C. (1991): Social Influence. Pacific Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V.W. (1989): Das Ritual. Struktur und Anti-Struktur. Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H./Delbecq, A.L./Koenig, R.J. (1976): Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations. In: American Sociological Review, S. 322-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1912): The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J.S./Renand, E. (2003): The Marketing of Luxury Goods: An Exploratory Study – Three Conceptual Dimensions. In: Marketing Review 3, S. 459-478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, M./Zajac, E.J. (2005): Status Evolution and Competition: Theory and Evidence. In: Academy of Management Journal 48, S. 282-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S.J./Liden, R.C. (1995): Effects of Impression Management on Performance Ratings: A Longitudinal Study. In: Academy of Management Journal 38, S. 232-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1924): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitik. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.E. (1943): Street Corner Society. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D.G. (1973): The Power Motive. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C./Huy, Q.N. (2007): How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 52, S. 70-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Organisation, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, SchlossAuhof, A-4040, Linz

    Prof. Dr. Johannes M. Lehner

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Johannes M. Lehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Freien Universität, Berlin

    Georg Schreyögg (Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Organisation und Führung) & Jörg Sydow (Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Unternehmenskooperation) (Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Organisation und Führung) &  (Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Unternehmenskooperation)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lehner, J. (2009). Statusverhalten in der Organisation im Spannungsverhältnis von formaler und informaler Hierarchie. In: Schreyögg, G., Sydow, J. (eds) Verhalten in Organisationen. Managementforschung, vol 19. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8287-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8287-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-1812-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-8287-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation