Factors Influencing the Degree of On-Board Content Engagement – A Qualitative Study

  • Lena Olech
  • Insa Beckmann


The management of an efficient and effective information flow on cruise ships is essential for the success of a cruise vacation. The more complex the offered cruise product gets and the more extensive the on-board content becomes the more difficult it is to provide the individual customer with the demanded information. In addition, the high amount of cruise content elements is distributed by many different sources through various channels. This cruise content complexity hampers the guests’ simple and straightforward usage. Interviews with cruise passengers have been conducted in order to identify the factors influencing the customers’ engagement with the information provided on board. From the findings a qualitative model has been derived that illustrates the critical factors. The model is created in order to give implications on how to facilitate the flow of information by delivering conditions to improve the cruise content usefulness and ease of use to the individual guest.


Ground Theory Axial Code Customer Segment Selective Code Cruise Ship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. America’s Vacation Center (2010), Mega Cruise Ships Deliver More. Retrieved November 14, 2010, from America’s Vacation Center.
  2. Choo, C. W. (2002), Information Management for the Intelligent Organization: The Art of Environmental Scanning (3rd ed.). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.Google Scholar
  3. Connell, J., Lowe, A. (1997), Generating Grounded Theory from Qualitative Data: The Application of Inductive Methods in Tourism and Hospitality Management Research. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3(2), 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costa Crociere S.p.A. (2010), Costa Pacifica. Retrieved November 14, 2010, from
  5. Davidson, A. L. (2002), Grounded Theory. Retrieved December 7, 2010, from
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989), Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989), User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Detlor, B. (2010), Information management. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goulding, C. (1999), Grounded Theory: some reflections on paradigm, procedures and misconceptions. Retrieved December 7, 2010, from University of Wolverhampton, Working Paper Series, WP006/99.
  10. Keil, M., Beranek, P. M. & Konsynski, B. R. (1995), Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems, 13, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Papathanassis, A. & Beckmann, I. (2011). Assessing the ‘Poverty of Cruise Theory’ Hypothesis. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lena Olech
  • Insa Beckmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations