Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vergütungssysteme

  • Chapter
Book cover Managed Care

  • 12k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Gestaltung von Vergütungssystemen für die Leistungserbringer ist ein wesentliches Steuerungsinstrument von Managed Care. Zum besseren Verständnis dieses Instruments und seiner Wirkungsweise werden zunächst die Grundlagen von Vergütungssystemen ganz allgemein dargestellt (s. Abbildung 2‐1), um dann genauer auf die Vergütungssysteme in Managed Care einzugehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Amelung, V. et al. (2009), Monetäre Anreize gezielt einsetzen- das Konzept qualitätsorientierter Vergütung, in: MVF 06/2009, 2. Jahrgang, S. 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelung, V. E./Janus, K. (2005), Budgetverteilung in der integrierten Versorgung – Welche Modelle haben eine Chance?, in: Hellmann W (Hrsg.), Handbuch integrierte Versorgung. 3. Erg. Lfg. 4/05, Economica Heidelberg, S. 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelung, V. E./Voss, H./Janus, K. (2005), Ökonomische Anreize in integrierten Versorgungssystemen – Grundlage für Nachhaltigkeit, Zufriedenheit und Motivation, in: Badura, B./Iseringhausen, O., Wege aus der Krise der Versorgungssituation – Beiträge aus der Versorgungsforschung, Hans Huber, Bern, S. 115–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelung, V./Zahn, T. (2009,: Pay-for-Performance (P4P) – Der Business Case für Qualität? (unveröffentlichte Studie), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Aventis Pharmaceuticals (2002), Managed Care Digest Series, HMO-PPO/Medicare- Medicaid Digest, Bridgewater/NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. /Delbanco, S. (2007), Pay for Performance: National Perspepctive. 2006 Longitudinal Survey Results with 2007 Market Updates, Med- Vantage Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann A./Clark, J. (2007), Performance Measurement and equity, in: BMJ; 334, S. 1333–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmeyer, N./Birkmeyer, J. (2006), Strategies for improving surgical quality – should payers rewards excellence or effort?, New England Journal of Medicine, 354 (8), S. 864– 870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böcker, K. et al. (2001), Diagnosis Related Groups – Grundstein für ein neues Abrechnungssystem der Krankenhäuser und Krankenkassen. Implikationen und Herausforderungen, in: Salfeld, R./Wettke, J. (Hrsg.), Die Zukunft des deutschen Gesundheitswesens. Perspektiven und Konzepte. Springer, Heidelberg. S. 49–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenheimer, T. S./Grumbach, K. (1994), Reimbursing Physicians and Hospitals, in: JAMA, 272, S. 971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenheimer, T. S./Grumbach, K. (1996), Capitation or Decapitation, in: JAMA, 276, S. 1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenheimer, T. S./Grumbach, K. (2009), Understanding Health Policy, A Clinical Aproach, 5. Auflage, MCGraw-Hill Medical

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacace, M. (2010), Das Gesundheitssystem der USA: Governance-Strukturen staatlicher und privater Akteure, Campus, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, M. F. (2006), Pay for Performance: Is Medicare a Good Candidate?, in: Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 2007 Winter; 7 (1), S. 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. G. et al. (1994), Use of Diagnosis-Related Groups by Non-Medicare Payers, in: Health Care Financing Review, 16, S. 127–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Casale, A. S./Paulus, R. A./Selna, M. J./Doll, M. C./Bothe, A. E./McKinley, K. E./Berry, S. A./Davis, D. E./Gilfillan, R.J ./Hamory, B. H./Steele, G. D. (2007), “ProvenCareSM”: A Provider-Driven Pay-for-Performance Program for Acute Episodic Cardiac Surgical Care, in: Annals of Surgery, Volume 246 (4) , S. 613–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casto, A./Layman, E. (2006), Principles of healthcare reimbursement, American Health Information Management Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernew, M. (2010), Bundled Payment Systems: Can They be More Successful this Time, in: Health Services Research 45 (5), Part I, October 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleverley, W. O./Song, P. ./Cleverley, J. O. (2010), Essentials of Health Care Finance, 7. Auflage, Sudbury, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Redesigning Health Insurance Performance Measures (2006), Rewarding provider performance: Aligning incentives in medicare, Institute of Medicine Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, D. A. et al. (1998), Primary Care Physician Compensation Method in Medical Groups, in: JAMA, 279, S. 853–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conzen, C./Freund, J./Overlander, G. (2009), Pflegemanagement heute, Okonomie Personal Qualität: verantworten und organisieren, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, J. et al. (2011), Pay for Performance in Health Care: Methods and Approaches. RTI Press Publication No. BK-0002-1103. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D. M. et al. (2004), The Role of Information in Medical Markets: An Analysis of Publicly Report Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery. In: The American Economic Review, Vol. 94 (2), S. 342–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damberg, C./Raube, K./Teleki, S./dela Cruz, E. (2009), Taking Stock of Pay-for- Performance: A Candid Assessment from the Front Lines, Health Affairs, Mar-Apr, 28(2), S. 517–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Damberg, C./Raube, K./Williams, T./Shortell, S. (2005), Paying for Performance: Implementing a Statewide Project in California, Q Manage Healthcare, Vol. 14(2), S. 66–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirschedl, P./Reichle, M./Röther, M. (2003), Modellprojekt Kodierqualität, In: Gesundheitswesen 2003, 65(1), S. 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, T./Fullwood, C./Gravelle, H./Reeves, D./Konstopantelis, E./Hiroe, U./ Roland, M. (2006), Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom, New England Journal of Medicine, 355 (4), S. 375–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, A. R. (2005), Pay-for-performance research: How to learn what clinicians and policy makers need to know, Journal of American Medical Association, 294 (14), S. 1821–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Düllings, J. et al. (2001), Praxishandbuch. Einführung der DRGs in Deutschland, Decker, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmert, M. (2008), Pay for Performance (P4P) im Gesundheitswesen, Ein Ansatz zur Verbesserung der Gesundheitsversorgung?, Burgdorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmert, M./ Schöffski, O. (2007), Public Reporting des kalifornischen „Pay for Performance” der Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA), in: Gesundheitswesen; 69, S. 438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, M. et al. (2009), Public Reporting in Health Care: How Do Consumers Use Quality-of-Care Information? A Systematic Review, in: Med Care 2009; 47, S. 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, R. B. et al. (1980), Case Mix Definition by Diagnosis-Related Groups, in: Medical Care, 18, Supplement, S. 1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, W. (2004), DRG-Entwicklungsperspektiven, in: Klauber, J./Robra, B.P./Schellschmidt, H. (Hrsg.) (2004), Krankenhaus-Report 2003 – Schwerpunkt: GDRG im Jahre 1, Schattauer, Stuttgart, S. 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, J. B. et al. (1996), Taking Health Status into Account When Setting Capitation rates: a Comparison of Risk-adjustment Methods, in: JAMA 1996, 276, S. 1316–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisina, L./Cacace, M. (2009), Chapter XII: DRGs and the Professional Independence of Physicians. In: Dwivedi, Ashish (ed.): Handbook of Research on IT Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare, Volume I, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, S. 173–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung et. al. (2008), The Evidence that Publishing Patient Care Performance Data Improves Quality of Care, in: Ann Intern Med; 148, S. 111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Th. et al. (2001), Patient's Attitudes Toward Cost Control Bonuses For Managed Care Physicians, in: Health Affairs 20(2), S. 186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gapenski, L. C. (1998), The Financial Risk to Hospitals Inherent in DRG, Per Diem, and Capitation Reimbursement Methodologies, in: Journal of Health Care Management, 43, S. 323–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmil, M. (2007), Pay-for-Performance in the US: What lessons for Europe?, in: Eurohealth, Vol. 13; No. 4, S. 21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraedts, M. (2006), Qualitätsberichte deutscher Krankenhäuser und Qualitätsvergleiche von Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens aus Versichertensicht, In: Gesundheitsmonitor, Düsseldorf, Bertelsmann-Stiftung

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraedts, M. et al. (2009), Public Reporting- Formen und Effekte öffentlicher Qualitätsberichterstattung, in: Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 134; S. 232–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GKV Spitzenverband (2011) www.gkvspitzenverband.de/Inhalte_der_Qualitaetsberichte.gkvnet, abgerufen März 2011

  • Gold, M. et al. (1995), A National Survey of the Arrangements Managed Care Plans Make with Physicians, in: The New England Journal of Medicine, 333, S. 1678–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goozner, M. (2011), United Healthcare, Five Oncology Practices Try Bundled Payments, JNCI Vol. 103, Issue 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, T./Forland, F./Kristiansen, I./Sutton, M./Leese, B./Guiffrida, A. (2002), Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and the mixed systems of payment: Effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians, The Cochrane Library

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbach, K. et al. (1998), Primary Care Physicians’ Experience of Financial Incentives in Managed-Care Systems, in: The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1516–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guterman, S./Davis, K./ Schoenbaum, S./ Shih, A. (2009), Using Medicare Payment Policy To Transform The Health System: A Framework For Improving Performance, in: Health Affairs 28, no. 2, S. w238–w250 (published online 27 January 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Günster, Ch./Mansky, Th./Repschläger, U. (2004), Das deutsche DRG-Entgeltsystem in: Klauber, J./Robra, B.-P./Schellschmidt, H. (Hrsg.) (2004), Krankenhaus-Report 2003 – Schwerpunkt: G-DRG im Jahre 1, Schattauer, Stuttgart, S. 43–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanchak, N. A. et al. (1996), U. S. Healthcare's Quality-Based Compensation Model, in: Health Care Financing Review, 17, S. 143–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, J. H. (2003), Does Publicizing Hospital Performance Stimulate Quality Improvements Efforts? in: Health Affairs; Vol. 22, Nr. 2, S. 84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsia, D. C. et al. (1992), Medicare Reimbursement Accuracy under the Prospective Payment System, 1985–1988, in: JAMA, 268, S. 896–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Integrated Healthcare Association (2011), 2011 P4P Measurement Set, unter: www.iha.org/pdfs_documents/p4p_california/ApprovedMY2011MeasureSet111610_OnlinePDF.pdf, Zugriff 12.06.2011

  • Integrated Healthcare Association (2010), Transparency Report 2010-Health Plan Payouts, www.iha.org/pdfs_documents/p4p_california/MY2009TransparencyReport_OnlinePDF.pdf, Zugriff 12.06.2011

  • Integrated Healthcare Association (2009), Transparency Report on 2008 Health Plan Payouts, www.iha.org/transpf/2008%20Transparency%20Report_OnlinePDF.pdf, Zugriff 20.06.2009

  • Integrated Healthcare Association (2006), Advancing Quality through Collaboration: The California Pay For Performance Program, A Report on the first Five Years and a Strategic Plan for the Next Five Years, February 2006, S. 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut of Medicine (IOM) (2001), Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, Washington D.C., National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut of Medicine (IOM) (2006a), Rewarding Provider Performance, Aligning Incentives in Medicare, Washington D.C., National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut of Medicine (IOM) (2006b), Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement (Pathways to Quality Health Care), Washington D.C., National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, K. (2003), Managing Health Care in Private Organizations. Transaction Costs, Cooperation and Modes of Organization in the Value Chain, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, K./Amelung, V. E. (2004), Integrierte Versorgung im Gesundheitswesen – Anreizorientierte Vergütungssysteme für Ärzte, Zeitschrift für Organisation; 73 (6), S. 304–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauber, J./Robra, B.-P./Schellschmidt, H. (2004), Krankenhaus-Report 2003 – Schwerpunkt: G-DRG im Jahre 1, Stuttgart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, W. (1998), Managed Care. What It Is and How It Works, Aspen, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kongstvedt, P. R. (2001a), Compensation of Primary Care Physicians in Open Panel Plans, in: Kongstvedt, P. R. (Hrsg.), The Managed Health Care Handbook, Gaithersburg, S. 120–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Kongstvedt, P. R. (2001b), Negotiating and Contracting with Hospitals and Institutions, in: Kongstvedt, P. R. (Hrsg.), The Managed Health Care Handbook, Aspen, Gaithersburg, S. 202–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Kongstvedt, P. R. (2001c), Non-Utilization-Based Incentive Compensation for Physicians, in: Kongstvedt, P. R. (Hrsg.), The Managed Health Care Handbook, Aspen, Gaithersburg, S. 166–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Kongstvedt, P. R. (2007), Essentials of managed Health Care, 5.Auflage, Sudbury, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kötter, T. et al. (2011), Die Etwicklung von Qualitätsindikatoren – Hintergrund, Methoden und Probleme, in: Z. Evid. Fortbild. Qual. Gesundh.wesen; 105, S. 7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. H. (2007), Pay for Performance, Version 2.0?, in: The New England Journal of Medicine 357 (6), S. 531–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. et al. (2010), A decision support System for diagnosis related groups coding, In: Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, Issue 4, S. 3626–3631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenauer, P. K. et al. (2007), Public Reporting und Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement, in: N Engl J Med 2007; 356; S. 486–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannion, R./Davies, H. (2008), Payment for performance in health care, in: British Medical Journal; Vol. 336, S. 306–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall et al. (2004), How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care?, in: International Journal for Quality in Health Care; Vol. 16,S. i57–i63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, R. E./Altman, S. H. (2009), Payment Reform Options: Episode Payment Is A Good Place To Start, in: Health Affairs 28, no. 2, S. w262–w271 (published online 27 January 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaseem, A. (2010): Pay for Performance Through the Lens of Medical Professionalism, in: Annals of Internal Medicine, 152, S. 366–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau, F./Roeder, N./Hensen, P. (2009), Auswirkungen der DRG-Einführung in Deutschland, Standortbestimmung und Perspektiven, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. C. (2001), The End of Managed Care, in: JAMA 285 (20), S. 2622–2628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. C./Casalino, LP (2001), Reevaluation of Capitation Contracting in New York And California, in: Health Affairs, July/August 2001, S. 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, M. B. (2008), Beyond Pay for Performance — Emerging Models of Provider- Payment Reform, in: The New England Journal of Medicine 359 (12), 1197–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, M. / Dudley, R. (2007), Pay-for-Performance, Will the Latest Trend Improve Care?, in: JAMA; Vol. 297, No. 7, S. 740–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanofi Aventis (2010), Managed Care Digest Series – HMO-PPO Digest for 2010–11, Bridgewater/NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, D./Wübker, A. (2008), Wie Qualitätsinformationen die Krankenhauswahl beeinflussen- eine empirische Untersuchung, Diskussionspapier Nr. 15, www.akad.de/fileadmin/akad.de/assets/PDF/WHL_Diskussionspapiere/WHL_Diskussionspapier_Nr_15_OnlinePDF.pdf

  • Schaeffer, D. (2006), Bedarf an Patienteninformationen über das Krankenhaus, Eine Literaturanalyse, Bertelsmann-Stiftung, Gütersloh

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauffler, H. H./Brown, C./Milstein, A. (1999), Raising the Bar: The Use of Performance Guarantees by the Pacific Business Group on Health, in: Health Affairs 18 (2), S. 134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider E. C. et al. (1998), Use of public performance reports. A survey of patients undergoinig cardiac surgery, in: J Am Med Assoc; 279; S. 1638–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwappach, D. L. B./Schubert, H. J. (2007), Offenlegen oder nicht? Chancen und Risiken der Veröffentlichung von medizinischen Qualitätsvergleichen, in: Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 132; S. 2637–2642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, L. M. (2005), How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey, in: British Medical Journal, 331:821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. A. / Ward, M. (2006), Public Reporting of Hospital outcomes based on administrative data: risks and opportunities, in: MJA 2006;184, S. 571–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (1995), On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector, in: Int. J Pub Admin; 18, S. 277–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S. C. et al. (1992), Physicians Responses to Fee-for-service and Capitation Payment, in: Inquiry, 29, S. 416–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. T./Moreland, C. C. (1995), The potential impact of diagnosis related group medical management on hospital Utilization and profitability, in: Health Care Managed Review, 20, S. 92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum, S. J. (2009), Pay for Performance in Medicare: Evidentiary Irony and the Politics of Value, in: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law; Vol 34, S. 717–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teleki, S./Damberg, L./Pham, C./Berry, H. (2006), Will financial incentives stimulate quality improvement? Reactions from frontline physicians, American Journal of Medical Quality, 21(6), S. 367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, H. (2007), Pay for Performance: Value-Based Purchasing in Healthcare, Presentation Health Spring Meeting- Session 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaiana, M. E./McGlynn, E. A. (2002), What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers. in: Med Care Res Rev 2002, 59; S. 3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Herck, P. et al. (2010), Systematic Review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care, in: BMC Health Service Research, 10:247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, L. et al. (2007), Financal Management, 3. Auflage, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W. W. (1991), Patient Management Categories, in: Neubauer, G./Sieben, G. (Hrsg.), Alternative Entgeltverfahren in der Krankenhausversorgung, Bleicher, Gerlingen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Volker Eric Amelung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amelung, V. (2012). Vergütungssysteme. In: Managed Care. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7129-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7129-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-3359-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-7129-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation