Skip to main content

Relational Behavior in Logistics Outsourcing Relationships

  • Chapter
  • 2544 Accesses

Abstract

Firms today no longer compete as solely autonomous entities, but rather as supply chains. Within a supply chain, customer firms increasingly look at relationships with their logistics service providers (LSPs) as a way to achieve competitive advantage. In this context, the notion has emerged that firms need to develop close, longer-term relationships – so called relational exchanges – in order to improve performance and to create highly competitive supply chains. However, in the specific logistics outsourcing context, empirical research on the relationships between relational activities and performance is limited. Therefore, using the norms concept, this study develops a conceptual model of selected dimensions of relational behavior and performance in logistics outsourcing relationships. In detail, the direct and indirect effects of flexibility, information exchange, and solidarity on performance in terms of goal achievement and goal exceedance are examined.

This study analyzes 171 logistics outsourcing relationships using a survey and partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling to empirically assess the proposed relationships. The results reveal that flexibility and information exchange are strong direct performance drivers. Solidarity also has direct positive effects on performance. However, the majority of its performance influence is channeled through its strong impacts on flexibility and information exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archol RS. 1997. Changes in the Theory on Interorganizational Relations in Marketing: Toward a Network Paradigm. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 25 (1) 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artz KW. 1999. Buyer–Supplier Performance: The Role of Asset Specificity, Reciprocal Investments and Relational Exchange. British Journal of Management 10 (2) 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenbaum B, Maltz A, Rabinovich E. 2005. Studies of Trends in Third-Party Logistics Usage: What Can We Conclude. Transportation Journal 44 (3) 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello DC, Gilliland DI. 1997. The Effect of Output Controls, Process Controls, and Flexibility on Export Channel Performance. Journal of Marketing 61 (1) 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowersox DJ, Daugherty PJ, Dröge CL, Rogers DS, Wardlow DL. 1989. Leading Edge Logistics: Competitive Positioning for t h e 1990’s. Council of Logistics Management: Oak Brook, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyson S, Corsi T, Dresner M, Rabinovich E. 1999. Managing Effective Third Party Logistics Partnerships: What Does it Take. Journal of Business Logistics 20 (1) 73–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JR, Lusch RF, Nicholson CY. 1995. Power and Relationship Commitment: Their Impact on Marketing Channel Member Performance. Journal of Retailing 71 (4) 363–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon JP, Archol RS, Gundlach GT. 2000. Contracts, Norms, and Plural Form Governance. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 28 (2) 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon JP, Perreault Jr. WD. 1999. Buyer-Seller Relationships in Business Markets. Journal of Marketing Research 36 (4) 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper MC, Gardner JT. 1993. Building Good Business Relationships – More than Just Partnering or Strategic Alliances. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 23 (6) 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom R, McNeilly KM, Speh TW. 1996. Buyer-Seller Relationships in the Procurement of Logistical Services. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 24 (2) 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty PJ. 2011. Review of logistics and supply chain relationship literature and suggested research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 41 (1) 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deepen JM, Goldsby TJ, Knemeyer AM, Wallenburg CM. 2008. Beyond Expectations: An Examination of Logistics Outsourcing Goal Achievement and Goal Exceedance. Journal of Business Logistics 29 (2) 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeter-Schmelz DR. 1997. Applying Teams to Logistics Processes: Information Acquisition and the Impact of Team Role Clarity and Norms. Journal of Business Logistics 18 (1) 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer FR, Schurr PH, Oh S. 1987. Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing 51 (2) 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Singh H. 1998. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review 23 (4) 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fites DV. March-April 1996. Make Your Dealers Your Partners. Harvard Business Review 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1) 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadde L-E, Hulthén K. 2009. Improving logistics outsourcing through increasing buyer–provider interaction. Industrial Marketing Management 38 (6) 633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götz O, Liehr-Gobbers K, Krafft M. 2010. Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial least Squares (PLS) Approach. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds). Springer Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg; 691–711.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA, Myers MB. 2005. The Performance Implications of Strategic Fit of Relational Norm Governance Strategies in Global Supply Chain Relationships. Journal of International Business Studies 36 (3) 254–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guetzkow H. 1965. Communications in Organizations. In Handbook of Organizations, March JG (ed).Rand McNally: Chicago, IL; 534–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach GT, Archol RS, Mentzer JT. 1995. The Structure of Commitment in Exchange. Journal of Marketing 59 (1) 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammervoll T. 2009. Channel cooperation: a reflective scale. The International Journal of Logistics Management 20 (3) 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide JB, John G. 1992. Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?. Journal of Marketing, 56 (2) 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide JB. 1994. Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing 58 (1) 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR. 2009. The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. In Advances in International Marketing (AIM), Vol. 20, Sinkovics RR, Ghauri PN (eds). Bingley; 277–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer AR, Knemeyer AM, Dresner ME. 2009. Antecedents and Dimensions of Customer Partnering Behavior in Logistics Outsourcing Relationships. Journal of Business Logistics 30 (2) 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber F, Herrmann A, Meyer F, Vogel J, Vollhardt K. 2007. Kausalmodellierung mit Partial Least Squares – Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Gabler Verlag: Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulland J. 1999. Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies. Strategic Management Journal 20 (2) 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivens BS. 2004. How relevant are different forms of relational behavior? An empirical test based on Macneil’s exchange framework. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 19 (5) 300–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivens BS. 2006. Norm-based relational behaviours: is there an underlying dimensional structure. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 21 (2) 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap SD. 1999. Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relation-ships. Journal of Marketing Research 36 (4) 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JL. 1999. Strategic Integration in Industrial Distribution Channels: Managing the Interfirm Relationship as a Strategic Asset. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 27 (1) 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston DA, McCutcheon DM, Stuart FI, Kerwood H. 2004. Effects of supplier trust on performance of cooperative supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management 22 (1) 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knemeyer AM, Murphy PR. 2004. Evaluating the Performance of Third-Party Logistics Arrangements: A Relationship Marketing Perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management 40 (1) 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knemeyer AM, Murphy PR 2005. Exploring the Potential Impact of Relationship Characteristics and Customer Attributes on the Outcomes of Third-Party Logistics Arrangements. Transportation Journal 44 (1) 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafft M, Götz O, Liehr-Gobbers K. 2005. Die Validierung von Strukturgleichungsmodellen mit Hilfe des Partial-Least-Squares (PLS)-Ansatz. In Handbuch PLS-Pfadmodellierung – Methoden, Anwendungen, Praxisbeispiele, Bliemel F, Eggert A, Fassott G, Henseler J (eds). Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag: Stuttgart; 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Scheer LK, Steenkamp J-BEM. 1995. The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research 32 (3) 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Stern LW, Anderson JC. 1993. Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants. Academy of Management Journal 36 (6) 1633–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Londe BJ, Cooper MC. 1989. Partnerships in Providing Customer Service: A Third Party Perspective. Council of Logistics Management: Oak Brook, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert DM, Cooper MC. 2000. Issues in Supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management 29 (1) 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert DM, Emmelhainz MA, Gardner JT. 1996. So You Think You Want a Partner. Marketing Management 5 (2) 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert DM, Emmelhainz MA, Gardner JT. 1999. Building Successful Logistics Partnerships. Journal of Business Logistics 10 (1) 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley CJJr., van Dort E, Morton J, Hoemmken S, Goh A, Zabawa M, Strata R, Riegler M. 2007. The State of Logistics Outsourcing: 2007 Third-Party Logistics – Results and Findings of the 12th Annual Study. Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley CJJr., Albright D, Morton J, Wereldsma D, Alf M, Swaminathan S, Smith G, Murphy J, Deakins TA, Hoemmken S, Peters K. 2009. The State of Logistics Outsourcing: 2009 Third-Party Logistics – Results and Findings of the 14th Annual Study. Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy SE, Murphy PR, Poist RF. 1995. Determinants of Successful Logistical Relationships: A Third-Party Provider Perspective. Transportation Journal 35 (2) 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuthesser L. 1997. Supplier Relational Behavior: An Empirical Assessment. Industrial Marketing Management 26 (3) 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuthesser L, Kohli AK. 1995. Relational behavior in business markets. Implications for relationship management. Journal of Business Research 34 (3) 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieb R, Bentz BA. 2005. The Use of Third-Party Logistics Services by Large American Manufacturers: The 2004 Survey. Transportation Journal 44 (2) 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch RF, Brown JR. 1996. Interdependency, Contracting, and Relational Behavior in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing 60 (4) 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macauly S. 1963. Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study. American Sociological Review 28 (1) 55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macneil IR. 1980. The New Social Contract, An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations, Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr J, Spekman R. 1994. Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal 15 (2) 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore KR, Cunningham III WA. 1999. Social exchange behavior in logistics relationships: a shipper perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 29 (2) 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narus JA, Anderson JC. 1987. Distributor Contributions To Partnerships With Manufacturers,” Business Horizons 30 (5) 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayides PM. 2007. Effect of Organizational Learning in Third-Party Logistics. Journal of Business Logistics 28 (2) 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle C, Wende S, Will A. 2005. SmartPLS version 2.0 M3. www.smartpls.de.

  • Seth N, Deshmukh SG, Vrat P. 2006. A conceptual model for quality of service in the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 36 (7) 547–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics RR, Roath AS. 2004. Strategic Orientation, Capabilities, and Performance in Manufacturer - 3PL Relationships. Journal of Business Logistics 25 (2) 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stank TP, Keller SB, Daugherty PJ. 2001. Supply Chain Collaboration and Logistical Service Performance. Journal of Business Logistics 22 (1) 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stank TP, Goldsby TJ, Vickery SK, Savitskie K. 2003. Logistics Service Performance: Estimating its Influence on Market Share. Journal of Business Logistics 24 (1) 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate K. 1996. The elements of a successful logistics partnership. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 26 (3) 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenburg CM. 2009. Innovation in Logistics Outsourcing Relationships: Proactive Improvements by Logistics Service Providers as a Driver of Customer Loyalty. Journal of Supply Chain Management 45 (2) 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenburg CM, Cahill DL, Goldsby TJ, Knemeyer AM. 2010. Logistics outsourcing performance and loyalty behavior: Comparisons between Germany and the United States. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 40 (7) 579–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Grahl, A. (2011). Relational Behavior in Logistics Outsourcing Relationships. In: Success Factors in Logistics Outsourcing. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7084-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics