Abstract
In the work of Pullman, Moore, and Wardell, they compared the QFD and conjoint analysis methods on the example of a new all purpose climbing harness for the beginning/ intermediate ability climbers. They view the two methods QFD and conjoint analysis “as complementary approaches that should be conducted simultaneously,” in which each method’s result supports the other. They concluded that QFD and conjoint analysis provide two “different lenses” that combine the product developers and the marketers in producing new or improved product (Pullman et al. 2002, p. 354).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abu-Assab, S. (2012). Integration of Preference Analysis Methods into QFD for Elderly People. In: Integration of Preference Analysis Methods into Quality Function Deployment. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7075-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7075-6_5
Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag
Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-3233-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-7075-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)