Skip to main content

Abstract

In the work of Pullman, Moore, and Wardell, they compared the QFD and conjoint analysis methods on the example of a new all purpose climbing harness for the beginning/ intermediate ability climbers. They view the two methods QFD and conjoint analysis “as complementary approaches that should be conducted simultaneously,” in which each method’s result supports the other. They concluded that QFD and conjoint analysis provide two “different lenses” that combine the product developers and the marketers in producing new or improved product (Pullman et al. 2002, p. 354).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abu-Assab, S. (2012). Integration of Preference Analysis Methods into QFD for Elderly People. In: Integration of Preference Analysis Methods into Quality Function Deployment. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7075-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics