Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phönix aus der Asche

Eine ereignisorientierte Betrachtung des Siemens-Korruptionsskandals als Nexus zwischen Organisation und Umwelt

  • Chapter
Organisation und Umwelt

Part of the book series: Managementforschung ((MGTF))

Zusammenfassung

Unsere phänomengetriebene Studie hat das wechselseitige Beeinflussungsverhältnis von Organisation und organisationaler Umwelt zum Gegenstand. Gestützt auf Konzepte und Erkenntnisse der neueren Institutionentheorie untersuchen wir im Rahmen einer ethnogra-phischen Feldstudie den Siemens-Korruptionsskandal der Jahre 2006 bis 2008. Dieses Er-eignis hatte nicht nur für das betroffene Unternehmen erhebliche Konsequenzen, sondern hat auch zu einer Neubewertung des Phänomens organisationaler Korruption in regulati-ver, normativer und kultureller Hinsicht geführt, deren Konsequenzen sich erst langsam abzuzeichnen beginnen. Es eignet sich daher in besonderer Weise, die vielfältigen Auswirkungen institutionellen Wandels auf eine fokale Organisation zu untersuchen. Sowohl aufgrund der Tragweite des Skandals, als auch ob der Bedeutung des involvierten Unternehmens ermöglicht es darüber hinaus eine Untersuchung der Handlungsmuster, durch die das betroffene Unternehmen den Wandel in seiner institutionellen Umwelt im Anschluss an den Skandal mitzugestalten versucht. Entsprechend unserer Überzeugung, dass sich Wandel nur aus einer Prozessperspektive heraus adäquat erfassen lässt, rekonstruieren wir den sich ändernden institutionellen Kontext des Phänomens Korruption sowie dessen Auswirkungen auf die fokale Organisation als Abfolge von Ereignissen in einem Modell, welches Ereignisse als Nexus zwischen einer fokalen Organisation und seiner Umwelt begreift.

Abstract

In our phenomenon-driven study we address mutual influences between a focal organiza-tion and its organizational environment. We draw on concepts and insights of new institu-tional theory as well as on the results of an extensive ethnographic field study of the Sie-mens corruption scandal from 2006 to 2008. We find that this event not only resulted in considerable consequences for Siemens, but also culminated in a reevaluation of the phe-nomenon of corporate corruption with regard to its regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive dimensions. It is therefore particularly suitable to analyze the various effects of institutional change on a focal organization like Siemens. Due to the momentum this scan-dal generated as well as due to the importance of Siemens, our case also makes it possible to analyze action patterns through which the focal company attempted to shape institutional change processes in its organizational environment subsequent to the scandal. According to our comprehension that change can only be assessed meaningfully from a process perspective, we reconstruct the development of the institutional context of the phenomenon corruption as well as its effects on the focal company as a sequence of events. We do so by proposing a model which conceptualizes events as a nexus between organizations and their organizational environment.

Für die wertvollen Hinweise und konstruktiven Verbessenmgsvorschläge im Zuge der Überarbeitung des Beitrags sind wir dem zuständigen Mitherausgeber Peter Conrad sowie auch den anonymen Gutachtern sehr verbunden. Darüber hinaus danken wir Jörg Sydow für seine nach Annahme dieses Beitrags ergänzend abgefasste „friendly review“.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Ahme, G./Brunsson, N./Garsten, C. (2002): Standardizing through organizations. In: Brunsson, N./Jacobsson, B. (Hrsg.): A world of standards. Oxford, S. 50–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (2003): Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. In: Academy of Management Review 28, S. 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, N./Watson, M.R. (2004): Tournament rituals in the evolution of fields: The case of the Grammy Awards. In: Academy of Management Journal 47 (1), S. 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, V./Ashforth, B.E./Joshi, M. (2004): Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. In: Academy of Management Executive 18 (2), S. 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, V./Ellstrand, A./Rajagopalan, A./Joshi, M. (2009): Organizational responses to allegations of corporate corruption. In: Burke, R.J./Cooper, C.L. (Hrsg.): Research companion to corruption in organizations. Cheltenham, S. 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arino, A./Ring, P.S. (2010): The role of fairness in alliance formation. In: Strategic Management Journal 31 (10), S. 1054–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W.B. (1989): Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. In: Economic Journal 99 (394), S. 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B.E./Gioia, D.A./Robinson, S.L./Trevino, L.K. (2008): Re-viewing organizational corruption. In: Academy of Management Review 33 (3), S. 670–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P./Coffey, A. (2004): Analysing documentary realities. In: Silvermann, D. (Hrsg.): Qualitative reserach. Theory, method and practice. London, S. 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S.R. (1983): Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (3), S. 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S.R. (1986): Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (1), S. 78–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S.R. (2008): Coalface institutionalism. In: Greenwood, M./Oliver, C./Sahlin, K./ Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, S. 491–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S.R./Tolbert, P.S. (1997): Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. In: Organization Studies 18 (1), S. 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J./Leca, B./Boxenbaum, E. (2009): How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneur ship. In: Academy of Management Annals 3, S. 65–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, N. (2003): Public affairs management: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung in multinationalen Unternehmungen. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L./Luckmann, T. (1967): The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowiege. Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, E. (2005): The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: A review. In: Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 4 (6), www.ehjournal.net/content/4/l/6, zuletzt abgerufen am 25.01.2011.

  • Brunsson, N./Jacobsson, B. (2000): The contemporary expansion of standardization. In: Brunsson, N./Jacobsson, B. (Hrsg.): A world of standards. Oxford, S. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R.J./Cooper, C.L. (Hrsg.)(2009): Research companion to corruption in organizations. Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M.K./Farkas, M.T./Sutcliffe, K.M./Weick, K.E. (2009): Learning through rare events: Significant interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum. In: Organization Science 20 (5), S. 846–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E.S./Cook, J.M. (1999): Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. In: Annual Review of Sociology 25, S. 441–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K.G./Gioia, D.A. (2004): Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (2), S. 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2008): How to misuse institutions and get away with it: Some reflections on institutional theory(ies). In: Greenwood, R./Oliver, C./Sahlin, K./Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.): The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, S. 769–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, M.T./Goodstein, J./Scott, W.R. (2002): Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. In: Academy of Management Journal 45 (1), S. 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A. (1985): Clio and the economics of QWERTY. In: American Economic Review 75 (2), S. 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa, L./Larmour, P. (2009): Transparency international: Global franchising and the war of information against corruption. In: Burke, R.J./Cooper, C.L. (Hrsg.): Research companion to corruption in organizations. Cheltenham, S. 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D.L./Suchman, M. (2008): Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In: Greenwood, R./Oliver, C./Sahlin, K./Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, S. 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, J.-L./Langley, A./Cazale, L. (1996): Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity. In: Organization Studies 17 (4), S. 673–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. (1978): The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J. (1988): Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: Zucker, L.G. (Hrsg.): Institutional patterns and organizations. Cambridge, MA, S. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J./Powell, W.W. (1983): The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: American Sociological Review 48 (2), S. 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L./Sahlin-Andersson, K. (Hrsg.)(2006): Transnational governance. Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K.D. (2006): Organizational perception management. Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P.C./Zajac, E.J. (2004): The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (4), S. 501–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P./Zyglidopoulos, S.C. (2009): Charting corporate corruption. Agency, structure and escalation. Cheltenham und Northampton, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (1991): The structural transformation of American industry: An institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919–1979. In: Powell, W.W./ DiMaggio, P.J. (Hrsg.): The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago und London, S. 311–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984): Strategic management: A stakehoder approach. Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E./Harrison, J.S./Wicks, A.C. (2007): Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardberg, N.A./Fombrun, C.J. (2006): Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. In: Academy of Management Review 31 (2), S. 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R. (2008): Conferences as venues for the configuration of emerging organizational fields: The case of cochlear implants. In: Journal of Management Studies 45 (6), S. 1061–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973): The interpretation of cultures. Selected essays. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979): Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkely, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984): The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A./Chittipeddi, K. (1991): Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. In: Strategic Management Journal 12 (6), S. 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golant, B.D./Sillince, J.A.A. (2007): The constitution of organizationl legitimacy. A narrative perspective. In: Organization Studies 28 (8), S. 1149–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeff, P./Schröder, K./Wolf, S. (Hrsg.)(2009): Der Korruptionsfall Siemens. Analysen und praxisnahe Folgerungen des wissenschaftlichen Arbeitskreises von Transparency International Deutschland. Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R./Oliver, C./Sahlin, K./Suddaby, R. (2008 Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, K.T. (2002): Organizing the process of standardization. In: Brunsson, N./Jacobsson, B. (Hrsg.): A world of standards. Oxford, S. 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D.J./Fox, C./Mehta, J.D. (2002): Studying rare events through qualitative case studies. In: Sociological Methods & Research 31 (2), S. 174–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C./Maguire, S. (2008): Institutional entrepreneur ship. In: Greenwood, R./Oliver, C./ Sahlin, K./Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, S. 198–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H.A./Russo, M.V./Meyer, A.D. (2001): Organizational environments in flux: The impact of regulatory punctuations on organizational domains, CEO succession, and performance. In: Organization Science 12 (3), S. 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyl, B.S. (2001): Ethnographic interviewing. In: Atkinson, P./Coffey, A./Delamont, S./Lofland, J./Lofland, L. (Hrsg.): Handbook of ethnography. London, S. 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P.M. (1997): Review essay. Sociology without social structure: Neoinstitutional theory meets brave new world. In: American Journal of Sociology 102 (6), S. 1702–1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A.J. (1999): Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. In: Academy of Management Journal 42 (4), S. 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A.J./Ocasio, W. (2001): Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. In: Organization Science 12 (4), S. 414–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isabella, L.A. (1990): Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. In: Academy of Management Journal 33 (1), S. 7–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C./Dowd, T.J./Ridgeway, C.L./Cook, K.S./Massey, D.S. (2006): Legitimacy as a social process. In: Annual Review of Sociology 32, S. 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M.E. (2007): Environmental disasters as risk regulation catalysts? The role of Bhopal, Chernobyl, Exxon Valdez, Love Canal, and Three Mile Island in shaping U.S. environmental law. In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35, S. 17–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallenberg, K. (2007): The role of risk in corporate value: A case study of the ABB asbestos litigation. In: Journal of Risk Research 10 (8), S. 1007–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B.G./Soule, S.A. (2007): Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (3), S. 413–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, W. (1990): Unternehmenspolitik und strategische Unternehmensführung. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T./Ashcraft, K.L. (2003): Corporate scandal and the theory of the firm. Formulating the contributions of organizational communication studies. In: Management Communication Quarterly 17 (1), S. 20–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (2007): The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence, and policy. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J./Meyer, A.D. (2008): Field-configuring events as structuring mechanisms: How conferences, ceremonies, and trade shows constitute new technologies, industries, and markets. In: Journal of Management Studies 45 (6), S. 1025–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J./Shamsie, J./Shapira, Z. (2009): Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. In: Organization Science 20 (5), S. 835–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, D. (2008): A multidimensional conceptual of organizaional corruption control. In: Academy of Management Review 33 (3), S. 710–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999): Strategies for theorizing from process data. In: Academy of Management Review 24 (4), S. 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (2009): Studying processes in and around organizations. In: Buchanan, D./Bryman, A. (Hrsg.): Handbook of organizational research methods. London, S. 409–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T.B./Suddaby, R. (2006): Institutions and institutional work. In: Clegg, S.R./ Hardy, C./Lawrence, T.B./Nord, W.R. (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organization studies. Thousand Oaks, S. 215–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyendecker, H. (2009): Die Grosse Gier. Korruption, Kartelle, Lustreisen: Warum unsere Wirtschaft eine neue Moral braucht. Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y.S./Guba, E.G. (1985): Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, R.A./Wirdenius, H. (1990): Interactive research. In: Scandinavian Journal of Management 6 (2), S. 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S./Hardy, C./Lawrence, T.B. (2004): Institutional entrepreurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. In: Academy of Management Journal 47 (5), S. 657–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K.D./Cullen, J.B./Johnson, J.L./Parboteeah, K.P. (2007): Deciding to bribe: A cross-level ananlysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. In: Academy of Management Journal 50 (6), S. 1401–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A.D./Gaba, V./Colwell, K.A. (2005): Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. In: Organization Science 16 (5), S. 456–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W./Rowan, B. (1977): Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: American Journal of Sociology 83 (2), S. 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. (2008): New sociology of knowledge: Historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research. In: Greenwood, R./Oliver, C./Sahlin, K./Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, S. 519–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C.C./Cardinal, L.B./Glick, W.H. (1997): Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. In: Academy of Management Journal 40 (1), S. 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K.D. (2009): Organizational risk after modernism. In: Organization Studies 30 (2-3), S. 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misangyi, V.F./Weaver, G.R./Elms, H. (2008): Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional pressures. In: Academy of Management Review 33 (3), S. 750–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mörth, U. (Hrsg.)(2004): Soft law in governance and regulation. An interdisciplinary approach. Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, N. (2008): Warum prägen Institutionen das Handeln in Organisationen? Die unbeantwortete Frage des Neo-Institutionalismus. In: Schreyögg, G./Sydow, J. (Hrsg.): Managementforschung 19. Wiesbaden, S. 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir, K.A./Phillips, N. (2005): The birth of the ‚Kodak Moment‘: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. In: Organization Studies 26 (11), S. 1665–1687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P.C. (1984): Types of organizational decision processes. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (3), S. 414–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, A.L./Montgomery, K. (2008): Using field-Configuring events for sense-making: A cognitive network approach. In: Journal of Management Studies 45 (6), S. 1147–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971): The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G./Zimmer, M. (2001): Strategisches Management, Recht und Politik. In Ortmann, G./Sydow, J. (Hrsg.): Strategie und Strukturation. Strategisches Management von Unternehmen, Netzwerken und Konzernen. Wiesbaden, S. 301–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2007): Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D./Biggart, N./Dick, B. (2008): Is the new institutionalism a theory? In: Greenwood, R./Oliver, C./Sahlin, K./Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, S. 739–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, B.L./Freeman, R.E./Harrison, J.S./Wicks, A.C./Purnell, L./de Colle, S. (2010): Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. In: Academy of Management Annals 4, S. 403–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M./Spicer, A. (2007): ‚Healing the scars of history‘: Projects, skills and field strategies in institutional entrepreneur ship. In: Organization Studies 28 (7), S. 1101–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A.M. (1990): Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. In: Organization Science 1 (3), S. 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfarrer, M.D./Decelles, K.A./Smith, K.G./Taylor, M.S. (2008): After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. In: Academy of Management Review 33 (3), S. 730–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J./Leana, C.R./Pil, F.K. (2008): Corrupt organizations or organizaions of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. In: Academy of Management Review 33 (3), S. 685–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, R.E./Vandenberg, R.J. (2010): Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. In: Journal of Management 36 (1), S. 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W./Colyvas, J.A. (2008): Microfoundations of institutional theory. In: Greenwood, M./Oliver, C./Sahlin, K./Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, S. 276–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. (1991): Coming to terms with the field: Understanding and doing organizational ethnography. In: Journal of Management Studies 28 (1), S. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanday, P.R. (1979): The ethnographic paradigm(s). In: Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (4), S. 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirm, S.A. (2001): Globalisierung und Global Governance: Multilaterales Management weltwirtschaftlicher Krisen? In: Opitz, P.J. (Hrsg.): Weltprobleme im 21. Jahrhundert. München, S. 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, F. (2003): Mobilisierung von Koalitionen für den Wandel in Organisationen. In: Die Betriebswirtschaft 63 (1), S. 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, M./Lounsbury, M. (2008): Social movements and institutional analysis. In: Greenwood, M./Oliver, C./Sahlin, K./Suddaby, R. (Hrsg.): The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Los Angeles, S. 650–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G./Sydow, J./Koch, J. (2003): Organisatorische Pfade - Von der Pfadabhängigkeit zur Pfadkreation? In: Schreyögg, G./Sydow, J. (Hrsg.): Managementforschung 13. Wiesbaden, S. 257–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1967): The phenomenology of the social world. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2008): Institutions and organizations. Ideas and interests. Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W.H./Farjoun, M. (Hrsg.)(2005): Organization at the limit. Lessons from the Columbia disaster. Maiden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A.L. (1997): On the virtues of the old institutionalism. In: Annual Review of Sociology 23, S. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M.C. (1995): Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. In: Academy of Management Review 20 (3), S. 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R./Greenwood, R. (2009): Methodological issues in researching institutional change. In: Buchanan, D./Bryman, A. (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of organizational research Methods. London, S. 176–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.B. (2000): Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P.S./Zucker, L.G. (1983): Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (1), S. 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations - Office of Drugs and Crimes (2004): United Nations convention against corruption. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H./Huber, G.P. (1990): Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. In: Organization Science 1 (3), S. 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (2010): A song for my supper: More tales of the field. In: Organizational Research Methods 13 (2), S. 240–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1990): Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the space shuttle challenger. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (2), S. 225–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volz, H.M./Rommerskirchen, T. (2009): Die Spur des Geldes. Der Fall des Hauses Siemens. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgenbach, P. (2002): Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie - State of the Art und Entwicklungslinien. In: Schreyögg, G./Conrad, P. (Hrsg.): Managementforschung 12, S. 155–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgenbach, P. (2006): Neoinstitutionalistische Ansätze in der Organisationstheorie. In: Kieser, A./Ebers, M. (Hrsg.): Organisationstheorien. 6. Aufl. Stuttgart, S. 353–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgenbach, P./Meyer, R.E. (2008): Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K./Heinze, K.L./DeSoucey, M. (2008): Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 53 (3), S. 529–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1995): Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D.C. (2009): The foreign corrupt practices act, SEC disgorgement of profits, and the evolving international bribery regime: Weighing proportionality, retribution, and deterrence. In: Michigan Journal of International Law 30, S. 471–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, R. (1968): Conditions. In: Journal of Philosophy 65 (12), S. 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J.D./Zajac, E.J. (1998): The symbolic management of stockholders. Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (1), S. 127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J.D./Zajac, E.J. (2001): Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. In: Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (2), S. 202–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijen, F./Ansari, S. (2007): Overcoming inaction through collective institutional entrepreneurship: Insights from regime theory. In: Organization Studies 28 (7), S. 1079–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. (2009): Die Siemens-Korruptionsaffäre - ein Überblick. In: Graeff, P./Schröder, K./ Wolf, S. (Hrsg.): Der Korruptionsfall Siemens. Analysen und praxisnahe Folgerungen des wissenschaftlichen Arbeitskreises von Transparency International Deutschland. Baden-Baden, S. 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, N.H. (2002): On writing fieldnotes: Collection strategies and background expectancies. In: Qualitative Research 2 (1), S. 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, J.-S./Khagram, S. (2005): A comparative study of inequality and corruption. In: American Sociological Review 70 (1), S. 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zickar, M.J./Carter, N.T. (2010): Reconnecting with the spirit of workplace ethnography: A historical review. In: Organizational Research Methods 13 (2), S. 304–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilber, T.B. (2002): Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. In: Academy of Management Journal 45 (1), S. 234–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M. (2009): Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: Theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. In: Organization Science 20 (5), S. 894–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1977): The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In: American Sociological Review 42 (5), S. 726–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Katholische Universität Eichstädt-Ingeolstadt, Schanze 49, 85049, Ingolstadt, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Christian Gebhardt (Lehrstuhl für ABWL, Organisation und Personal Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät Ingolstadt)

  2. Institut für Management, Freie Universität Berlin, Boltzmannstr. 20, 14195, Berlin, Germany

    Dr. Gordon Müller-Seitz

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Christian Gebhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Gordon Müller-Seitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Peter Conrad Jörg Sydow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gebhardt, C., Müller-Seitz, G. (2011). Phönix aus der Asche. In: Conrad, P., Sydow, J. (eds) Organisation und Umwelt. Managementforschung. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6940-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6940-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-3121-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-6940-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation