Public Opinion towards Digital Billboards in the United States: An Analysis of Recent Polls

  • Charles R. Taylor
  • George R. Franke


This study built on the results of a prior meta-analysis of public opinion toward billboards to identify relevant issues and examine the available evidence on the American public’s view of digital billboards. In general, consistent with the Taylor and Franke (2005) meta-analysis, the results show favorable public opinion toward digital billboards as well as the major provisions of the Highway Beautification Acts.


Public Opinion Traffic Safety Random Digit Dialing Federal Highway Public Opinion Poll 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abernethy, Avery M. & Franke, G.R. (1996), “The Information Content of Advertising: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Advertising, 25 (Summer), 1-18.Google Scholar
  2. Arbitron (2008), “Arbitron Digital Billboard Report: Cleveland Case Study.” New York: Arbitron.Google Scholar
  3. Arbitron (2009), “Arbitron Outdoor Billboard Report: Los Angeles County Case Study.” New York: Arbitron.Google Scholar
  4. Behavior Research Center, Inc. (2005), “Memorandum on Research on Electronic Billboards” (accessed March 12, 2010.
  5. Birdsall, M.S. (2008), “The Debate over Digital Billboards: Can New Technology Inform Drivers Without Distracting Them?” ITE Journal, 78 (4), 22-27.Google Scholar
  6. Environmental Working Group (2000), The Highway Beautification Act: A Broken Law. Washington, DC: Environmental Working Group (
  7. EPIC*MRA (2009), Michigan Statewide Poll (October 11-15).Google Scholar
  8. Farley, J.U. & Lehmann, D.R. (1994), “Cross National ‘Laws’ and Differences in Market Response,” Marketing Science, 40 (January), 111-122.Google Scholar
  9. Federal Highway Administration (2007), “Guidance on Of-Premise Changeable Message Signs,” Memo from Gloria M. Shepherd to Division Administrators. September 27.Google Scholar
  10. Highway Beautification Act (1965), Pub. L. 89-285 78 Stat 1028.Google Scholar
  11. Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (1990), Methods of Meta-Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Outdoor Advertising Association of America (2009). “Digital Technology Billboards. Outdoor Advertising’s Glowing Future.. www.marketing_resources/digital/.apx(accessed March 10, 2010).
  13. Outdoor Advertising Association of America (2009). “Digital Technology Billboards Today. Technology with a Purpose.” (accessed March 10, 2010).
  14. Scenic America (2000), “Billboard and Sign Control,” Washington DC: Scenic America (
  15. Scenic America (2009), “Billboards in the Digital Age. Unsafe (and Unslightly) at Any Speed.” (accessed March 10, 2010)
  16. Story, L. (2007), “Digital Billboard Up Ahead: New Wave Sign or Hazard,” New York Times, (January 11).; (accessed March 10, 2010).
  17. Taylor, C.R. and Taylor, J.C. (1994), “Regulatory Issues in Outdoor Advertising: A Content Analysis of Billboards,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13 (1), 97-108.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, C.R. & Chang, W. (1995), “The History of Outdoor Advertising Regulation in the United States,” Journal of Macromarketing, 48 (Spring), 47-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor, C.R. & Franke, G.R. (2003), “Business Perceptions of Billboards in the U.S. Economy,” Journal of Advertising Research, (June), 150-161.Google Scholar
  20. Vespe, F. (1997), “High-tech Billboards: The Same Old Litter on a Stick,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 16 (1), 176-279.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles R. Taylor
    • 1
  • George R. Franke
    • 2
  1. 1.Villanova UniversityUSA
  2. 2.University of AlabamaUSA

Personalised recommendations