Skip to main content

Text or Pictures? Effectiveness of Verbal Information and Visual Cues in Advertisements for New Brands versus Extensions

  • Chapter
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 2)

Abstract

Innovation is a key success factor of a company’s growth. Through new product introductions, companies try to satisfy customers and to obtain a significant competitive advantage. However, introducing new brands has major downsides. The total cost of introducing a new product is very high. In addition, a large amount of new product introductions still fail. By introducing extensions (new (versions of) products which make use of existing brand names), companies hope to leverage the reputation and awareness of the existing brand (parent brand) to the new product (line extension) (Aaker and Keller, 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaker, D. A. & Keller, K. L. (1990), “Consumer evaluations of brand extensions,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 (1), 27-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, L. A. & Burns, A. C. (1997), “Effects of print ad pictures and cpoy containing instructions to imagine on mental imagery that mediates attitudes,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 16 (3), 33-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932), “Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology,” Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boush, D. M.; Shipp, S.; Loken, B.; Gencturk, E.; Crockett, S. & Kennedy, E. (1987), “Affect and generalization to similar and dissimilar brand extensions,” in: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 4 (3), 225-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-LaTour, K. A. & LaTour, M. S. (2004), “Assessing the long-term impact of a consistent advertising campaign on consumer memory,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 33 (2), 49-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, I. (2008), “Brand placement in novels,” in: International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 27 (4), 495-509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, S.; Keller, K. L. & Sood, S. (2000), “Communication strategies for brand extensions: Enhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29 (4), 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. & Buchanan-Oliver, M. (2006), “Advertising across cultures: Interpretations of visually complex advertising,” in: Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 28 (1), 57-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C. & Keller, K. L. (2003), “Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30 (2), 292-301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dens, N.; De Pelsmacker, P. & Janssens, W. (2008), “Exploring consumer reactions to incongruent mild disgust appeals,” in: Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 14 (4), 249-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dens, N. & De Pelsmacker, P. (2010), “How advertising strategy affects brand and USP recall for new brands and extensions,” in: International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29 (2), 165-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986), “Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect,” in: Sorrentino, R. M.; Higgins, E. T. (eds.): The handbook of motivation and cognition, volume 1: Foundations of social behavior, Guilford, New York, 167-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friestad, M. & Wright, P. (1994), “The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, 1-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, W.; De Pelsmacker, P. & Geuens, M. (2007), “Does a medium context have a priming or an interference effect? It depends on how you look at it,” in: Proceedings of the Advances in Consumer Research, North America, 684-685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J. & Russo, E. J. (1984), “Product familiarity and learning new information,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11 (June), 542-550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardes, F. R.; Posavac, S. S. & Cronley, M. L. (2004), “Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts,” in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 14 (3), 230-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, R. J. & Allen, C. T. (1994), “Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 (3), 97-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (2000), “Marketing management,” Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. (2000), “The limited capacity model of mediated message processing,” in: Journal of Communication, Vol. 50 (1), 46-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y. & Sternthal, B. (1999), “The effects of positive mood on memory,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 26 (2), 115-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, D.; Mackie, D. M. & Chaiken, S. (1992), “Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments,” in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 1 (4), 317-336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlbaum (1982), “The structure of value: Accounting for taste,” Vol. pp. 3-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J. & Tybout, A. M. (1989), “Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 (1), 39-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miniard, P. W., Bhatla, S., Lord, K. R., Dickson, P. R. & Unnava, H. R. (1991), “Picture-based persuasion processes and the moderating role of involvement,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 (June), 92-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabi, R. L., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. & Carpentier-Dillman, F. (2008), “Subjective knowledge and fear appeal effectiveness: Implications for message design,” in: Health Communication, Vol. 23 (2), 191-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nan, X. L. (2006), “Success factors of line extensions and fast-moving consumer goods,” in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33 (5/6), 450-469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A.; Clark, J. M. & Lambert, W. E. (1988), “Bilingual dual-coding theory and semantic repetition effects on recall,” in: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning memory and cognition, Vol. 14, 163-172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.-W.; Kim, K.-H. & Kim, J. (2002), “Acceptance of brand extensions: Interactive influences of product category similarity, typicality of claimed benefits, and brand relationship quality,” in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 29 (1), 190-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puto, C. P. & Wells, W. D. (1984), “Informational and transformational advertising: The differential effects of time,” in: Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11 (1), 638-643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B. (1975), “Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories,” in: Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 7, 573-605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, D.D. & Petty, R.E. (2006), “Increasing the effectiveness of communications to consumers: Recommendations based on elaboration likelihood and attitude certainty perspectives,” in: Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol. 25 (1), 39-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W. & Kallgren, C.A. (1988), “Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients’ access to attitude-relevant information in memory,” in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 14 (1), 172-182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Shintaro Okazaki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., Puttemans, B. (2011). Text or Pictures? Effectiveness of Verbal Information and Visual Cues in Advertisements for New Brands versus Extensions. In: Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 2). Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6854-8_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics